The bill renames the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to the Endangered Species Recovery Act and requires that references to the old name be treated as references to the new name. It amends the first section of the 1973 Act to reflect the new title and mandates that all laws, regulations, documents, and records referencing the ESA of 1973 be deemed references to the Endangered Species Recovery Act.
The text presented shows no other substantive changes to protections, processes, or funding. The measure is fundamentally a drafting and branding change intended to unify terminology across federal law.
At a Glance
What It Does
Section 2(a) renames the Act within the statute by replacing “Endangered Species Act of 1973” with “Endangered Species Recovery Act.” Section 2(b) requires any reference to the old name to be treated as a reference to the new name across laws, regulations, and other records.
Who It Affects
Legal drafters, agencies administering wildlife protections, and legislative/reference publishers who rely on precise statutory citations.
Why It Matters
Ensures consistent naming across the federal code and related documents, reducing confusion for policymakers, practitioners, and courts, even though no policy changes are included in the text as written.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill is a housekeeping measure that changes the naming of the federal wildlife protection statute. Specifically, it renames the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to the Endangered Species Recovery Act and updates the referencing framework so that any use of the old name is automatically understood as referring to the new name.
The renaming is effected in the statute’s opening section, and the bill requires that all laws, maps, regulations, documents, and other records use the new title going forward. There are no additional policy changes to how endangered species protections are administered within the bill’s text.
In practical terms, this is a branding and codification adjustment. Agencies, courts, and legal publishers will need to update citations and cross-references to ensure consistency.
Because the bill does not alter protection standards, procedures, or funding mechanisms, the impact is primarily administrative—streamlining terminology and reducing ambiguity in legal references across the federal statute and related materials.Readers should expect transitional work to align databases, index terms, and legal research tools with the new name. The absence of substantive policy amendments means stakeholders can anticipate continuity in ongoing programs while undertaking the necessary reference updates.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The first section of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is amended to rename the act as the Endangered Species Recovery Act.
All references in law, regulations, documents, and records to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 must be treated as references to the Endangered Species Recovery Act.
The renaming is a drafting change affecting naming and citation, not substantive protections or procedures.
The renaming is applied to the first section cited for the act’s branding update (16 U.S.C. 1531 note).
The bill is introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Harriet Hageman and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Section 1 establishes the short title mechanism, noting the document may be cited as the Endangered Species Recovery Act. This creates the naming framework within the act itself but does not alter protections or procedures.
Renaming of the Act in the Statute
Section 2(a) amends the first section of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 by striking the old name and inserting the Endangered Species Recovery Act. The change is a formal branding update designed to align the statutory title with the new designation.
Updated References Across Law
Section 2(b) provides that any reference in law, regulation, document, paper, or other record to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 will be deemed to be a reference to the Endangered Species Recovery Act. This ensures uniformity across the federal code and related materials.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Legal drafters and Congressional staff who must maintain consistent citations, reducing ambiguity in legislative documents and databases.
- Federal and state wildlife agencies (e.g., Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA Fisheries) that rely on clear statutory references for enforcement and compliance activities.
- Law librarians, publishers, and legal researchers who index and retrieve materials by statute name, improving search precision.
- Courts and litigants who cite the statute, benefiting from uniform terminology across opinions and briefs.
Who Bears the Cost
- Agency compliance teams may need to audit and update internal databases and policy documents to reflect the new name.
- Legal publishers and information vendors will incur costs to update indexes, cross-references, and training for editors and researchers.
- State wildlife agencies and partners with state-law cross-references may need to adjust internal references and guidance materials.
- Courts and clerks may experience transitional costs as dockets and citations are updated to reflect the new name.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing the need for a clear, consistent name across all federal materials with the risk of temporary confusion or miscitations during the transition period, given that no substantive protections in the statute are being altered.
Because this is a renaming and not a substantive policy change, the primary policy question is timing and accuracy of reference updates. The bill does not include transitional provisions for cross-referencing old citations in older documents or decisions, which could create short-term inconsistency as references shift to the new name.
Practitioners should anticipate a period of adjustment where databases, search tools, and legal texts gradually reflect the Endangered Species Recovery Act.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.