The bill renames the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to the Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2025. It does this through Section 1 (short title) and Section 2 (renaming and references).
The text does not alter protections, standards, or procedures; it is a housekeeping measure focused on naming and cross-reference clarity. Because the change touches hundreds of statutes and regulatory texts, the cross-reference provisions aim to prevent ambiguity as agencies, courts, publishers, and practitioners update citations.
At a Glance
What It Does
Section 1 designates the short title as the Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2025. Section 2 ensures that any reference to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is deemed a reference to the Endangered Species Recovery Act. No changes to protections or enforcement mechanisms are included.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies that reference the ESA in regulations and guidance, such as the Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and NOAA Fisheries, plus environmental law publishers and legal databases.
Why It Matters
It creates a uniform naming convention across federal law, reducing cross-reference ambiguity. It also imposes an administrative burden to update citations across statutes, regulations, and records.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The proposal is a naming adjustment rather than a policy overhaul. Section 1 sets the official short title as the Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2025, signaling that this is the new name for the familiar Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Section 2 directs that references to the old act name be treated as references to the new name, thereby maintaining continuity in legal texts and regulatory materials. The bill does not modify protections, administrative procedures, or enforcement standards tied to endangered species.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The short title is changed to Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2025.
References to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 are deemed to refer to the Endangered Species Recovery Act.
There are no changes to protections, standards, or procedures in the text.
The cross-reference clause will drive a broad administrative update across statutes, regulations, and databases.
Introduced in the 119th Congress on July 31, 2025, by Senator Lummis with several co-sponsors.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Section 1 designates the Act’s short title as the Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2025. This is a declarative naming provision and does not alter any substantive content of the law.
Renaming and Cross-References
Section 2 renames the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to Endangered Species Recovery Act and substitutes the new name in legal references. It also provides that references to the old act name in laws, maps, regulations, documents, papers, or other records shall be deemed to refer to the Endangered Species Recovery Act.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. Department of the Interior, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and NOAA Fisheries, which rely on precise citations for regulatory actions
- Environmental law publishers and legal databases that manage statute cross-references and searchability
- Environmental compliance professionals and counsel who rely on consistent naming in internal materials and training
- Courts and administrative agencies that cite the Act in opinions and orders, reducing citation ambiguity
- State wildlife agencies that reference federal law in their own regulations and guidance
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agency legal teams charged with updating internal references and drafters of agency guidance and regulations
- Regulatory and legal database publishers updating indexing and search terms
- State regulatory bodies updating cross-references in state laws and codes
- Private sector lawyers and compliance teams updating corporate documents and training materials
- Academic researchers updating bibliographies and legal reference materials
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Uniform naming across a vast corpus of law vs. the administrative burden and transitional risk of updating countless references across statutes, regulations, and documents.
The renaming creates a clear administrative task: updating statutes, regulations, citations, and cross-references across a large legal universe. While the bill’s deeming provision helps avoid ongoing ambiguity, the practical burden of ensuring consistent usage across thousands of pages—and across state and private-sector texts—remains.
There is also a potential for transitional confusion in contexts where older references persist in practice, such as legacy training materials or earlier court decisions that may still quote the old name. The bill does not address any funding or sequencing for these updates, leaving compliance teams to manage the transition.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.