This bill establishes an Office of Young Americans inside the Executive Office of the President and gives the office a Director to advise the President and coordinate federal responses to issues affecting young people. The Office is designed to serve as a central White House clearinghouse for youth engagement and policy coordination across agencies.
The change matters because it creates a permanent, White House-level focal point for ‘‘young Americans’’ policymaking and for channeling federal programs, partnerships, and attention to a demographic cohort that spans early adults through mid-career workers. In practice, the Office could shape how agencies prioritize youth-facing programs and influence budget and program design across the executive branch.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates an Office headed by a Presidential appointee who will serve as the primary White House advisor on issues that substantially affect young Americans. The Office will coordinate across federal departments, seek public and intergovernmental input, leverage agency resources on a reimbursable basis, and produce recurring “Preparedness Outlook” reports with recommendations and resource estimates.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Executive Office of the President, the Domestic Policy Council, and agencies that run youth-facing programs (e.g., Education, Labor, HHS, HUD). It also creates a formal federal point of contact for youth organizations, state/tribal/local governments, academia, and private-sector partners who want to engage on youth policy. The statutory beneficiary population is defined by the bill as U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents ages 18–40.
Why It Matters
Placing the office inside the EOP and making the Director a member of the Domestic Policy Council elevates youth issues into high-level White House policymaking. The Office’s statutory coordination role and mandated reporting create a lever to influence agency priorities and the President’s budget requests, even though the Office’s authority is advisory and relies on interagency cooperation and available funding.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill establishes a new executive office within the White House specifically tasked with elevating and coordinating federal attention to the needs and civic engagement of ‘‘young Americans.’’ The Director — a Presidential appointee with a salary set at Executive Schedule level II — will be the President’s principal advisor on youth matters and will be charged with identifying cross-cutting issues and recommending strategies for engagement across the executive branch.
Operationally, the Director gets a narrow staffing envelope (authority to appoint up to two full-time equivalent employees and to hire consultants at specified pay caps) and may request reimbursable services and detailees from other federal agencies. The Office may also hold public hearings and consult broadly with state, tribal, local governments, industry, academia, and civil society to inform its work.A central deliverable is a “Preparedness Outlook” report due to the President, specific House and Senate committees, and the public within one year of enactment and at least once every five years thereafter.
Each report must identify issues warranting near-term Presidential or agency attention and include resource estimates and recommendations. The bill defines ‘‘young American’’ as a citizen or lawful permanent resident between ages 18 and 40 and makes the Director a member of the Domestic Policy Council to ensure the Office has a formal seat at interagency policy discussions.Although the Office’s statutory role is primarily advisory and coordinative rather than regulatory or budget-authorizing, the statutory placement inside the EOP gives it visibility and a channel into the President’s budget process.
That combination — advisory authority plus a DPC seat plus a recurring public report — is designed to make the Office an engine for whole-of-government youth policy rather than a ceremonial post.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The President appoints a Director (and may appoint one Associate Director); the Director’s pay is set at Executive Schedule Level II.
The Director is a statutory member of the Domestic Policy Council and is designated the President’s principal advisor on issues that primarily and substantially affect young Americans.
The Office may appoint up to two full-time equivalent staff and hire consultants at pay rates capped by reference to Executive Schedule Level IV; the Associate Director’s pay is capped at Level III.
Within one year of enactment, and at least once every five years thereafter, the Director must deliver a public “Preparedness Outlook” identifying priority issues and resource needs to the President and to specified House and Senate committees.
The bill defines ‘‘young American’’ as a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident between the ages of 18 and 40 and authorizes the Office to use reimbursable services from other federal agencies and to hold hearings nationwide.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishes the Office of Young Americans in the EOP
This subsection creates the Office inside the Executive Office of the President and gives it an official statutory identity. Establishing the Office in the EOP — rather than, for example, within a single department — signals intent to coordinate across the whole executive branch and ensures direct White House oversight and visibility.
Leadership, appointment rules, and pay
The President appoints the Director and may appoint a single Associate Director (the statute bars multiple concurrent Associate Directors). The bill sets explicit pay ceilings: the Director at Executive Schedule Level II and the Associate Director capped at Level III. Those pay references both fix the political appointee status and create a predictable ceiling for compensation, tying the office’s leadership to established executive pay scales.
Core duties and membership on the Domestic Policy Council
The Director’s enumerated duties include identifying issues that primarily affect young Americans, advising the President on youth engagement, and coordinating interagency activities. The statute goes beyond a loose advisory role by making the Director a member of the Domestic Policy Council, which institutionalizes the Office’s access to interagency policymaking while leaving implementation authority with individual agencies.
Staffing, consultants, and use of detailees
The Office may appoint individuals equaling up to two full-time equivalents, set their pay up to limits tied to section 102 of title 3, and use consultants at pay up to Executive Schedule Level IV. The Director can request reimbursable services from other agencies and accept detailees. Those authorities give the Office modest direct staffing while enabling it to scale work through interagency personnel and reimbursable arrangements.
Preparedness Outlook reporting requirement
Within one year of enactment and then at least once every five years, the Director must produce a public report to the President and specific congressional committees identifying issues needing Presidential or agency attention, along with recommendations and resource estimates. The report requirement is the Office’s primary accountability mechanism: it is both the vehicle for prioritization and the formal way the Office feeds recommendations into the Executive Branch and Congress.
Definitions and scope
The statute defines ‘‘Federal agency’’ by reference to the Executive Agency definition in title 5 and sets the term ‘‘young American’’ to mean citizens or lawful permanent residents aged 18–40. Those definitions delimit who the Office represents and which executive entities the Office may coordinate with, but they also create a clear cohort boundary that will determine the Office’s policy reach.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Young Americans aged 18–40 — gain a dedicated White House office focused on issues that span education, employment, mental health, housing, and climate impacts, and a formal channel for engagement with federal policymakers.
- Youth organizations and advocacy groups — get a single, identifiable federal interlocutor to coordinate meetings, submit input, and push for policy changes across agencies rather than pursuing separate relationships with multiple departments.
- Federal programs and agencies seeking cross-cutting solutions — may benefit from strategic direction and improved interagency coordination that can reduce duplication and highlight funding or programmatic gaps.
Who Bears the Cost
- The Executive Office of the President and the White House budget — must absorb the Director’s salary, at least two FTE positions, and administrative costs unless the President reallocates existing resources or requests additional funding in an administration budget.
- Federal agencies providing reimbursable services and detailees — may face administrative and personnel burdens when supplying staff, expertise, or facilities on a reimbursable basis, particularly if multiple agencies are asked to participate in Office-led initiatives.
- Congressional committees and oversight staff — will see new reporting and engagement responsibilities tied to the mandated Preparedness Outlook, requiring time and potential follow-up action without an explicit funding stream attached to recommendations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between creating a visible, White House-level advocate to unify youth policy and the bill’s reliance on advisory authority and interagency cooperation rather than direct funding or implementation power — a structure that can elevate priorities without guaranteeing that agencies will change programs, allocate money, or produce measurable outcomes.
The bill creates visibility and coordination, but it stops short of granting implementation authority or dedicated appropriations. The Office’s influence will therefore depend on informal levers — DPC membership, public reports, and the ability to shape Presidential budget requests — and on agency willingness to cooperate.
That design risks producing strong rhetoric and modest operational change unless the Administration commits resources and agencies accept the Director’s strategic priorities.
The 18–40 age band is unusually broad and politically consequential: it combines college-age adults, early-career workers, and established mid-career individuals into a single policy cohort. That breadth helps capture long-term workforce and civic-engagement transitions but also risks diluting programmatic focus and complicating measurement.
The bill also authorizes the use of reimbursable services and detailees, which avoids an immediate appropriation but shifts costs and coordination burdens to partner agencies; interagency friction or under-resourcing could limit the Office’s practical capacity to deliver on its reporting and coordination mandates.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.