The PARTNERS Act establishes a new federal grant stream—funded from amounts in the H‑1B Nonimmigrant Petitioner Account—to expand registered apprenticeships and other paid work‑based learning for small and medium‑sized businesses in identified in‑demand sectors. The Department of Labor makes allotments to States (using modified WIOA formulas), States award competitive grants to industry or sector partnerships, and partnerships use the funds for employer engagement, program development, and participant supports.
This matters to workforce offices, apprenticeship sponsors, community colleges, and employers because it blends employer‑led partnerships with federal financing targeted at scaling apprenticeship pipelines for hard‑to‑fill occupations. The bill layers WIOA rules, targeted support service requirements, reporting mandates, and a capped grant size that will shape how States and local partnerships prioritize sectors, participants, and services.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill directs available funds specified in the Immigration and Nationality Act to the Secretary of Labor to make allotments to States (modified by WIOA formulas). Governors award up to three‑year grants—maximum $500,000—to industry or sector partnerships to develop or expand registered apprenticeships and other paid work‑based learning programs for small and medium‑sized businesses in in‑demand sectors.
Who It Affects
State workforce agencies and Governors, industry/sector partnerships (including employers, unions, education providers), registered apprenticeship sponsors, small and medium‑sized employers in targeted sectors, and workers—especially those with barriers to employment and historically underrepresented groups.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a dedicated, employer‑focused funding path that repurposes H‑1B petitioner fee revenue toward domestic training pipelines. That reframes part of H‑1B fees from immigration administration to workforce development and imposes WIOA‑style reporting and performance expectations on locally administered apprenticeship efforts.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The PARTNERS Act channels a portion of H‑1B fee receipts into a grant program run by the Department of Labor and implemented by States to grow apprenticeships and other paid, employer‑based training in sectors identified as in‑demand. States must apply to the Secretary (in consultation with State and local boards) describing which local or regional industry partnerships they will support, how they will engage small and medium employers, which programs and credentials will be offered, and how the activities align with existing WIOA plans.
Once a State receives an allotment, the Governor uses most of the funds to award competitive grants to eligible industry or sector partnerships. Grants may run up to three years and are capped at $500,000.
States may keep up to 5 percent of their allotment for administration and must ensure geographic diversity among grant recipients. Partnerships that receive grants must designate a fiscal agent and may use funds to establish or expand partnerships, help employers register apprenticeships, build curricula, connect employers to education providers, and employ trainees for transitional paid periods.The bill emphasizes participant supports: partnerships must offer at least 12 months of support services after placement (including pre‑training and a transitional employment period) and provide at least six months of post‑employment support as part of grant planning.
There is a specific cap: no more than 5 percent of a partnership’s grant may be used for direct transportation, child care, or similar supports. Projects must track and report WIOA performance indicators, disaggregated by populations and demographics, with one‑year local evaluations and state‑level reports submitted 24 months after initial local reporting.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The program is funded by redirecting 50 percent of amounts in the H‑1B Nonimmigrant Petitioner Account to carry out the PARTNERS Act.
States receive allotments under modified WIOA formulas; the Secretary may reserve up to 5% for federal administration, 2% for evaluations, and 0.25% for outlying areas.
Grants to industry or sector partnerships are limited to a maximum of $500,000 and up to a 3‑year period per award.
Partnerships must provide support services for participants for at least 12 months after placement and include at least 6 months of post‑employment support in their plans, while no more than 5% of a grant may be used for transportation, child care, or similar services.
Recipients must report WIOA performance indicators annually (local reports begin one year after the grant and states submit consolidated reports 24 months after initial local reporting).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Funding source and statutory hook
The bill ties its funding to amounts ‘‘available under section 286(s)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act’’—i.e., H‑1B petitioner fee receipts—and directs the Secretary of Labor to carry out the program using those funds. This makes the program dependent on H‑1B fee flows and the statutory availability language; it is not a standard annual appropriations grant. That funding linkage also requires the conforming change in section 9 that explicitly allocates 50% of the H‑1B account to the PARTNERS Act.
State allotments and application requirements
The Secretary uses modified WIOA allotment clauses to distribute funds to States after reserving small percentages for Federal administration, evaluation, and outlying areas. To qualify for an allotment, States must meet WIOA eligibility criteria and submit an application developed with State and local boards describing which local or regional partnerships will be supported, targeted in‑demand sectors, programs to be funded, target populations (including individuals with barriers), credentials, performance targets, and plans to leverage other funding. The provision of specific application content forces States to tie grants into existing WIOA plans and performance regimes.
Governor‑administered grants to partnerships
Governors use their State allotments to award competitive grants to eligible industry or sector partnerships identified in the State application. Grants are limited to $500,000 and up to three years; the State may reserve up to 5% of its allotment for administration. The section allows entities to be represented in multiple partnerships, but requires geographic diversity among awards, which will shape which regions and labor markets receive investment.
Permitted uses: employer engagement, program development, and supports
Grantees must use funds to support registered apprenticeships or other paid work‑based learning. The statute lists discrete business‑engagement activities (help navigating apprenticeship registration, curriculum development, linking to education providers, transitional paid employment, mentor training, and recruitment from other assistance programs). It separately enumerates participant supports—education linkages, pre‑apprenticeship, mentorship, tools and attire, and transportation/child care—but caps spending on the latter category at 5% of a grant. The law also requires partnerships to provide support services for at least 12 months post‑placement, folding retention services into the grant’s core work.
Reporting, evaluation, and disaggregation requirements
Local partnerships must evaluate and report annually beginning one year after a grant award, using the performance indicators in WIOA section 116(b)(2)(A). States consolidate those local reports into a State evaluation and submit to the Secretary 24 months after initial local reporting (but no sooner than 18 months after grants are awarded) and annually thereafter. The statute demands demographic disaggregation—race, ethnicity, sex, age, and WIOA population categories—heightening data and administrative requirements for grantees and States.
Conforming amendments and fund reallocation
The bill repeals a provision of the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 and amends INA section 286(s)(2) to specify that 50% of deposits into the H‑1B Nonimmigrant Petitioner Account remain available to the Secretary of Labor to carry out the PARTNERS Act. That change both creates the revenue stream and shifts where H‑1B fee dollars flow, with downstream effects on any programs that previously relied on that set‑aside.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Small and medium‑sized employers in targeted in‑demand sectors — the grants pay for registration help, mentor training, transitional paid placements, and curriculum development that lower the cost and complexity of running apprenticeships.
- Workers with barriers to employment and underrepresented groups — the statute requires outreach, explicit inclusion in State applications, support services (including tools and mentorship), and demographic reporting designed to improve access and track equity.
- Industry or sector partnerships and apprenticeship sponsors — receive seed and expansion funding (up to $500,000) to build employer networks, align credentials with local labor demand, and link classroom providers to on‑the‑job learning.
- State workforce agencies and local workforce boards — gain a discrete funding stream to expand WIOA‑aligned apprenticeship strategies and to meet performance measures tied to placements and credential attainment.
Who Bears the Cost
- H‑1B petitioning employers (indirectly) — the bill redirects a statutory portion of H‑1B petitioner fee receipts into domestic training, reallocating resources that fee payers previously funded for other purposes.
- State and local workforce agencies — must develop competitive applications, manage grants, collect disaggregated WIOA metrics, and perform evaluations; States may reserve only up to 5% for admin, pushing operational costs onto existing staff.
- Industry partners and small employers — while the program lowers some barriers, employers must still invest time and possibly non‑Federal resources to participate and to sustain programs after grant periods end.
- Department of Labor — assumes new administrative, technical assistance, and evaluation responsibilities tied to a statutory funding stream whose revenue can fluctuate with H‑1B filings.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between creating a targeted, employer‑driven pipeline for in‑demand occupations (which requires stable, focused funding and rigorous employer engagement) and the practical limits of a small, fee‑funded grant program that imposes WIOA‑style reporting and time‑limited awards—meaning the bill promotes scale and accountability but may underfund the supports and administrative capacity needed to sustain employer engagement and equitable outcomes.
The bill creates useful, employer‑focused capital for apprenticeship expansion but does so by tying the program to a volatile revenue stream: H‑1B petitioner fee receipts can rise and fall with immigration filings and policy changes, which complicates multi‑year planning at the State and partnership level. The statute’s reliance on WIOA definitions and performance indicators ensures alignment with existing workforce systems but raises administrative hurdles for small partnerships and small employers that lack data capacity.
The program’s $500,000 maximum and three‑year ceiling will seed projects but may be too small to scale sectoral pipelines in large metropolitan labor markets.
The statute also sets explicit limits that can constrain service delivery: the 5% cap on transportation, child care, and similar direct supports is likely too restrictive in high‑cost areas where those supports are gatekeepers to employment. At the same time, the law requires 12 months of post‑placement supports and demographic disaggregation—both costly but crucial for retention and equity tracking—without providing a larger administrative set‑aside.
Finally, repurposing H‑1B fee funds has policy ripple effects: programs that previously received the 50% allocation will need alternative funding or programmatic redesigns, and the bill does not resolve potential overlaps with existing federal apprenticeship or WIOA competitive grants.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.