The American Apprenticeship Act establishes a federal program to help states cover the costs of pre‑apprenticeship programs and related classroom instruction that feed into registered apprenticeship pathways. It sets up a competitive grant process administered by the Secretary of Labor (with Department of Education review), requires strategic state plans and industry partnership documentation, and builds in performance measurement and a final report to Congress.
For employers, postsecondary institutions, workforce boards, and community organizations, the bill is a targeted attempt to expand apprenticeship entry points—especially into occupations where apprenticeships currently play a minor role—while anchoring funding to measurable quality standards and state collaboration.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes competitive grants to states to defray costs of pre‑apprenticeship programs and related instruction tied to registered apprenticeships concentrated in underused occupations. It defines eligible sponsors and program elements, requires state strategic plans and partner commitments, and creates performance and evaluation requirements with a federal report to Congress.
Who It Affects
State workforce and education agencies (as grant recipients and administrators), sponsors of pre‑apprenticeships (local education agencies, community organizations, labor groups), postsecondary institutions (for credit articulation), and industry sponsors of registered apprenticeship programs. It also targets outreach to underrepresented populations and employers in nontraditional, high‑demand sectors.
Why It Matters
The measure uses focused federal dollars to lower the entry barriers into apprenticeship pipelines and to promote sector growth where apprenticeships are currently uncommon—potentially reshaping employer recruitment and upskilling practices in targeted industries while creating new coordination responsibilities for states and partners.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a federal mechanism for states to get help paying for the classroom and preparatory pieces that get people ready for registered apprenticeship programs. Rather than funding apprenticeships directly, it covers the pre‑apprenticeship and related instruction side — tuition, textbooks, curriculum work, and other educational supports — to increase the pool of candidates who can step into registered apprenticeships.
The Secretary of Labor runs the program and consults the Department of Education on application review and performance design.
States must apply competitively with a strategic plan. That plan must identify the state agency that will administer the grant, show partnerships with industry and apprenticeship sponsors, describe how the state will coordinate with existing federal programs (Perkins and WIOA) and leverage available benefits (Pell, veteran benefits, WIOA services), and explain outreach and equity strategies for populations underrepresented in apprenticeships.
The bill also requires states to describe how they will maintain quality standards and report on prior grant performance if they previously received funding under the program.On the program design side, the bill defines a ‘‘pre‑apprenticeship’’ as a documented partnership activity that includes industry‑aligned curricula reviewed annually by apprenticeship sponsors, hands‑on training that does not displace paid employees, and formal agreements that create a pathway into a registered apprenticeship including credit recognition by postsecondary institutions. Funds may be used for tuition and fees, textbooks and equipment, curriculum development, and other items a state deems necessary; states may reserve up to 10 percent for administrative expenses.The bill directs the Secretary to set performance measures (drawing on the Office of Apprenticeship’s indicators) and to build an evaluation and reporting system.
It also tasks the Department with identifying in‑demand occupations—nationally and regionally—where apprenticeships are underused and reporting that analysis back to states and Congress. Funding is authorized on a multi‑year basis to support grant rounds, but the statute sets modest appropriations, leaving grant awards likely limited and competitive.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary of Labor may make competitive grants to States to defray costs of pre‑apprenticeship programs and related instruction associated with qualified (registered) apprenticeship programs.
The statute caps the Federal share of project costs between 20 percent and 50 percent; the remainder must come from the State in cash or fairly valued in‑kind contributions (including donations).
Eligible pre‑apprenticeship sponsors include local education agencies, secondary schools, area career and technical education schools, State or local boards, joint labor‑management committees, labor organizations, and community‑based organizations; qualified apprenticeship sponsors include employers, joint labor‑management partnerships, trade or professional associations, and labor organizations.
Grant funds may cover tuition, fees, textbooks, equipment, curriculum development and other items the State determines necessary; States may use up to 10 percent of grant funds for administration.
The Act authorizes $15,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2031 and requires the Secretary to submit an evaluation report to Congress by September 30, 2030.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions: qualified apprenticeship, pre‑apprenticeship, sponsor, related instruction
This section sets the baseline vocabulary the rest of the bill uses. ‘‘Qualified apprenticeship’’ means a program registered under the National Apprenticeship Act and concentrated in sectors that currently represent less than 10 percent of apprenticeable occupations or programs — a targeting mechanism for underused fields. The pre‑apprenticeship definition is detailed: annual curriculum review by apprenticeship sponsors, hands‑on plus theoretical training that does not displace paid workers, and a formal agreement enabling successful participants to flow into the apprenticeship (including credit articulation with postsecondary institutions). Those specific elements create both program quality expectations and operational requirements for sponsors and education partners.
Competitive state grants and application requirements
The Secretary may award grants to States on a competitive basis. Applications must identify the State entity that will administer funds, demonstrate industry and education partnerships, show coordination with Perkins and WIOA programs, and present outreach strategies to expand apprenticeships into nontraditional and high‑demand industries. States applying for continuation must also document prior performance. The statute explicitly requires a joint review team from the Departments of Labor and Education, embedding interagency oversight into the approval process.
Permitted uses, admin limits, performance, and Federal share
Grant funds may be used for tuition and fees, textbooks, equipment, curriculum development, and other items the State deems necessary; administrative costs are limited to 10 percent. The Secretary (in consultation with Education) must establish performance measures from Office of Apprenticeship indicators and an aligned evaluation and reporting system. The statute fixes the Federal contribution to projects between 20 and 50 percent, forcing States to provide matching resources in cash or in‑kind.
Analysis of underused, in‑demand occupations
The Secretary must identify nationally and regionally in‑demand occupations where apprenticeships are underused, analyze how the apprenticeship model is being (or isn’t being) applied, and report the findings to States and Congress. That analysis is designed to steer technical assistance and future targeting, but the statute does not prescribe how the results will change grant selection criteria.
Appropriations and congressional reporting
The Act authorizes $15 million per fiscal year for 2026–2031 to carry out the program and requires a final evaluation report to Congress by September 30, 2030. The appropriation level is modest relative to national apprenticeship needs, which will affect award sizes and competition intensity among States.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Individuals entering apprenticeships: The bill lowers out‑of‑pocket barriers to entry (tuition, materials, preparatory training) and creates clearer pathways from pre‑apprenticeship into registered apprenticeships, improving access for candidates who need classroom preparation.
- Community‑based organizations and education sponsors: Local education agencies, CBOs, and secondary/CTE schools can receive grant funding to expand curricula, buy equipment, and formalize partnerships that provide a feeder pipeline into apprenticeships.
- Underrepresented populations: The statute requires states to outline targeted outreach to minority groups, youth, veterans, individuals with disabilities, and people with barriers to employment, which can increase recruitment resources and supportive services for these groups.
- Postsecondary institutions: Colleges and training providers that agree to recognize credit for pre‑apprenticeship learning can strengthen enrollment and credential pipelines and gain funding for curriculum development.
- State workforce and education agencies: States receive dedicated federal dollars to stand up or scale pre‑apprenticeship infrastructure and to coordinate partners across education and industry.
Who Bears the Cost
- State governments: States must provide between 50 and 80 percent of project funding (depending on the federal share), either in cash or in‑kind, and absorb administrative responsibilities and reporting burdens tied to the grant.
- Employers and apprenticeship sponsors: While not primary funders under the statute, sponsors must participate in curriculum review, partner agreements, and commitments to accept completers when space is available, adding administrative and coordination costs.
- Department of Labor and Education: The Departments must staff joint review teams, create performance and evaluation systems, and produce required reports—work that may require new resources not explicitly appropriated beyond program funds.
- Small providers and less‑resourced states: Competitive awards and modest overall funding risk favoring states and organizations with grant writing capacity and existing apprenticeship infrastructure, effectively imposing an opportunity cost on those without capacity.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill tries to expand access to registered apprenticeships by subsidizing the preparatory education that precedes them, but it does so with modest federal resources and substantial state matching and administrative expectations—balancing targeted expansion and quality control against limited funding and uneven state capacity creates a trade‑off between reach and rigor.
The bill packs a lot of policy design into a small authorization. Authorizing $15 million per year will fund only a limited number of grants nationwide; that scarcity makes the competitive selection process consequential for which states and industries benefit.
The statute requires coordination with Perkins, WIOA, Pell, and veterans benefits, but it does not provide dedicated funding to unify those systems; that reliance on leveraging other streams could mean funds are fungible in practice and raises non‑supplanting questions for states. The definition of ‘‘qualified apprenticeship’’ targets occupations concentrated in sectors that represent less than 10 percent of apprenticeable occupations or programs, but the metric for that threshold is not operationalized in the text — judges and administrators will rely on Department guidance to interpret what counts as ‘‘concentrated’’ or as an industry that is currently underusing apprenticeships.
Performance measurement is delegated to the Secretary and anchored to Office of Apprenticeship indicators. That gives the Department flexibility to set meaningful quality standards, but it also concentrates evaluative power in a federal agency and could privilege short‑term, easily measured outputs (enrollments, credentials) over longer‑term labor market outcomes (wage progression, retention).
The 20–50 percent federal share provides flexibility but leaves states responsible for substantial matching; states with constrained budgets or weaker employer networks may struggle to participate, undermining the equity goals the program sets out to advance. Finally, the program’s prohibition on displacing paid employees is sound policy but will require enforcement mechanisms and clear definitions in practice to prevent misuse.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.