The bill inserts a new section into chapter 13 of title 31, U.S. Code, that creates automatic continuing appropriations whenever Congress has not enacted regular funding for a program, project, or activity by the start of the fiscal year. Instead of a one‑off stopgap, the statute supplies funds at a reduced, automatically calculated rate and keeps them available until regular appropriations or a separate continuing resolution becomes law.
This approach prevents government-wide lapses in authority and protects most mandatory programs, but it also deliberately reduces funding over time to pressure lawmakers to pass full appropriations. The mechanics — apportionment tied to the prior year and phased percentage reductions — shift significant operational and political consequences onto agencies, grantees, and Congress itself.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes automatic continuing appropriations for any program, project, or activity that lacks enacted funding at the start of the fiscal year, making funds available at a reduced rate and extending availability until Congress enacts an appropriations law or a continuing resolution. Funding levels decline on a fixed schedule while entitlements and certain mandatory programs continue at the levels required to maintain current law benefits.
Who It Affects
Federal departments and agencies, state and local grantees that receive discretionary grants, contractors paid under federal awards, beneficiaries of entitlement programs, and the House and Senate Appropriations Committees will face the statute’s new operational rules. OMB and Treasury will carry new administrative responsibilities to apportion and monitor automatically provided funds.
Why It Matters
The statute removes immediate shutdowns as a negotiating tool by guaranteeing continuity, but it introduces a built‑in, time‑based financial penalty for inaction that alters budgeting incentives and long‑term agency planning. Compliance officers, grant administrators, and appropriation staff need to understand the triggers, apportionment method, and declining funding schedule to plan operations during funding lapses.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a new statutory section, §1311, that makes appropriations automatically available when Congress fails to pass the regular appropriation Act or a continuing resolution for a particular program, project, or activity by the fiscal year’s first day. The automatic funding is not a full restoration of prior year dollars; instead, the law directs agencies to operate at a reduced rate until Congress enacts a funding measure.
The statute ties availability and apportionment to the corresponding amounts provided in the prior fiscal year (or in the most recently enacted continuing appropriations law) so agencies can calculate baseline levels without new legislation.
The initial automatic funding rate is set at a specific fraction of the prior year’s operations and remains in effect for a defined 90‑day period. If Congress still has not enacted appropriations after each 90‑day block, the permitted rate declines by one percentage point for the next 90 days, and so on; these reductions continue past the fiscal year’s end if appropriations remain undone.
For mandatory programs and entitlements (and certain activities under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008), the bill preserves the authority to pay at whatever rate is necessary to maintain program levels under current law rather than forcing those programs into the stepped reductions.During any automatic funding period agencies must apportion amounts in the same proportions as the previous fiscal year, which effectively freezes internal distribution formulas while total funding shrinks. The statute also bars using the automatic funding to make new grants or award funds in ways that would usurp Congress’s final funding prerogatives at year’s end.
Finally, the provision includes a savings clause: it does not apply where another law already authorizes continuations or expressly bars continuations for a specific program, preserving existing statutory exceptions and carveouts.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a new §1311 in chapter 13 of title 31 that triggers automatic continuing appropriations when a program lacks enacted funding at the start of the fiscal year.
Initial automatic funding is set at 94 percent of the prior year’s rate of operations (or the most recent comparable continuing resolution) for a 90‑day period.
After each 90‑day period with continued non‑enactment, the allowable rate is reduced by one percentage point, and those reductions continue beyond the fiscal year if necessary.
Mandatory programs and entitlements (and activities under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008) are exempt from the stepped reduction and receive whatever rate is necessary to maintain current law program levels.
Agencies must apportion automatic funds in the same proportions used the previous fiscal year and may not award new grants or make distributions that would impinge on Congress’s final appropriations prerogatives.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act’s name: the Government Shutdown Prevention Act of 2025. This is a standard clause that does not affect implementation but gives the statute its public reference name.
Trigger and baseline for automatic appropriations
Establishes the automatic appropriation trigger: if an appropriation Act or continuing appropriations measure is not law for a given program by the first day of the fiscal year, the program receives funds as if it had been funded in the prior fiscal year. The baseline is the corresponding appropriation Act from the preceding year, or, if that prior bill never became law, the most recent law providing continuing appropriations. Practically, agencies will look to last year’s enacted distributions (or last continuing resolution figures) to compute the starting amounts.
Rate of operations and phased reductions
Specifies the arithmetic: the statute caps automatic funding at 94 percent of the applicable prior‑year rate for an initial 90‑day period, then reduces that cap by one percentage point after each subsequent 90‑day period. The provision applies the reductions cumulatively and allows those reductions to extend past the fiscal year’s end. This is the bill’s primary pressure mechanism: continuity with a descending funding trajectory that forces agencies to operate with shrinking discretion over time.
Availability, apportionment, and charging expenditures
Makes funds available from the first day of the lapse until a regular appropriation or a continuing resolution becomes law, and requires agency heads to apportion the available amounts in the same proportions as in the previous fiscal year. It also directs that expenditures made under the automatic provision be charged to the applicable appropriation or fund once a regular appropriation or a full-year continuing resolution is enacted, preserving accounting continuity.
Mandatory program protection and carveouts
Carves out entitlements and other mandatory payments by allowing them to receive the level necessary to maintain current law rather than be subject to the percentage reductions; it also prevents automatic funding from being used to make grants or distributions that would usurp Congress’s final funding decisions. The section preserves existing statutory exceptions by stating that §1311 does not apply where another law already authorizes continuation or expressly prohibits continuation for particular programs.
Clerical amendment to chapter table
Adds a table entry for the new §1311 to chapter 13’s table of contents. This has no substantive effect but ensures internal code references and indexing reflect the insertion.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal employees whose work is funded by programs lacking enacted appropriations — the automatic funding reduces the risk of furloughs by keeping payroll and operations legally funded during lapses.
- Recipients of entitlements and mandatory benefits (for example Social Security, certain nutrition programs) — the bill preserves authority to make required payments at levels necessary under current law, avoiding interruptions in benefit delivery.
- State and local governments and long‑term grantees that rely on formula or mandatory funding — they retain continuity in core program funding even when discretionary appropriations stall, reducing short‑term service disruptions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Congressional appropriators and party leadership — the measure removes immediate shutdown leverage, shifting pressure from an all‑or‑nothing stoppage to gradual budgetary compression, which changes negotiation dynamics and reduces the potency of a threat to withhold appropriations entirely.
- Federal agencies and program managers — agencies must operate with declining percentage caps, re‑apportion funds according to last year’s proportions, and implement complex calculations and reporting while facing the operational strain of shrinking resources.
- Discretionary grant recipients, new program starts, and contractors — the statute bars awards that would impinge on final funding prerogatives and reduces available discretionary funding, which can delay or shrink grants, impede new procurements, and create cash‑flow stress for contractors and subrecipients.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between preventing disruptive shutdowns and preserving Congress’s constitutional power of the purse: the bill guarantees continuity of government services but weakens the immediate leverage that historically compelled timely appropriations, trading a binary enforcement tool (shutdown) for a gradual, statutory budgetary penalty that reshapes political and administrative incentives.
The bill solves one problem — abrupt funding lapses — by replacing it with another: a statutory, time‑driven reduction in operational capacity. Implementing the percentage‑based cap and the 90‑day stepdowns raises several practical questions.
Agencies must translate “rate of operations” into concrete line‑item budgets, a process complicated where prior‑year funding included one‑time awards, rescissions, or supplemental appropriations. Apportioning amounts “in the same proportion” as last year can lock in prior distribution choices that no longer match current program priorities, and the prohibition on making grants that impinge on final prerogatives creates ambiguity about what constitutes an impermissible award.
The bill’s protection for entitlements narrows the shoe‑horn problem but creates administrative complexity about which payments qualify for the exemption and how to reconcile mixed funding streams (programs with both mandatory and discretionary components). Operationally, OMB and Treasury will need new guidance and monitoring capability to calculate caps, issue apportionments, and audit compliance — but the bill does not appropriate resources to cover those administrative burdens.
Finally, the law alters political incentives: a steady but declining funding pathway may encourage Congress to delay hard decisions or allow chronic underfunding of programs that need timely annual adjustments.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.