S.2806 adds a new 31 U.S.C. §1311 that automatically provides the sums necessary to continue programs, projects, and activities when Congress fails to enact appropriations. Funding is made available at the prior year’s rate for operations and initially covers a 14‑calendar‑day period; if the lapse continues, the automatic appropriation renews in additional 14‑day increments until Congress enacts an appropriation or continuing resolution.
The bill changes how lapses affect agencies and the budget baseline: it limits certain initial large distributions and grants, allows agency transfers with OMB approval (capped at 5 percent per account), requires agencies to charge expenditures to eventual appropriation accounts, and instructs budget scorekeepers to treat these automatic sums in specific ways under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act. For compliance officers, budget offices and Appropriations Committees, the bill replaces the blunt instrument of shutdowns with a predictable stopgap while raising legal, oversight, and administrative questions about congressional power of the purse and agency flexibility.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates a statutory continuing-appropriations trigger that kicks in at the start of a fiscal-year lapse, authorizing funding at prior-year operational rates for 14 days and automatically extending in 14-day blocks until Congress passes an appropriation or continuing resolution. It preserves entitlements at levels necessary to maintain program operations and constrains large upfront distributions and new grant awards.
Who It Affects
Federal executive agencies, the Office of Management and Budget, program beneficiaries of entitlements (including SNAP and other mandatory programs), grantees and contractors, and the House and Senate Appropriations Committees are directly affected. OMB and agency budget officers will handle transfers and apportionment work not previously required during full shutdowns.
Why It Matters
This changes the practical leverage created by funding lapses: agencies and recipients would keep operating, reducing immediate service disruptions but also reducing congressional bargaining power. It also creates new administrative work and budget‑scoring consequences that will matter to compliance staff, budget offices, and oversight committees.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The core of S.2806 is simple in concept but detailed in execution. When Congress does not enact required appropriations for a program that had funding in the prior year, the statute automatically makes available the sums necessary to continue that program at the rate for operations found in the most recent applicable appropriation Acts.
That authority begins on the first day of the lapse and runs for an initial 14 calendar days; if the lapse persists, the authority renews in additional 14‑day blocks until Congress passes an appropriation Act or a continuing appropriation that covers the account.
The bill defines which prior-year law controls (either the most recent continuing appropriation or the most recent full-year appropriation) and separately addresses entitlements and mandatory payments, directing that those programs receive funding at the rate necessary to maintain program levels under current law. To prevent the automatic mechanism from preempting final congressional funding decisions, the statute bars large initial distributions and prevents awarding grants that would undercut Congress’s ultimate funding prerogatives.Agencies get limited flexibility to respond: with OMB approval an agency head may transfer up to 5 percent of an account to another account within the agency to address higher priority needs, but Congress must be promptly notified of transfers.
Expenditures made under the automatic authority are later charged to the applicable appropriation account once Congress enacts the year’s appropriations, and apportionment time limits in statute do not apply for these sums. The bill also preserves existing statutory exceptions—if another law already provides or prohibits funds for a program during a lapse, the automatic mechanism does not apply.Finally, S.2806 includes budgetary instructions that affect scoring and enforcement: it directs scorekeepers to treat the automatic sums as discretionary for certain budget acts and as part‑year appropriations for discretionary spending limits, and it adjusts deadlines for required BBEDCA reports during a lapse.
The act takes effect on September 30, 2025, and inserts the new section into chapter 13 of title 31 and updates the chapter table of sections.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The automatic funding begins on the first day of a fiscal‑year lapse and is available initially for 14 calendar days, renewing in additional 14‑day blocks until congressional action.
Agency heads may transfer funds made available under the statute to other accounts with OMB approval, but no more than 5 percent of an appropriation account may be transferred.
The statute prohibits using its automatic authority to make large initial distributions or award grants that would 'impinge on final funding prerogatives,' a phrase left deliberately broad.
Expenditures made under the automatic authority must later be charged against the applicable appropriation account once Congress enacts the fiscal‑year appropriation or continuing act.
The bill directs that its budgetary effects be treated under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act—classifying the automatic sums as discretionary and as part‑year appropriations for enforcement and baseline calculations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
States the Act’s name as the 'Eliminate Shutdowns Act.' This is procedural but signals the bill’s intent: to replace funding lapses that produce shutdowns with a statutory continuity mechanism.
Defines 'lapse in appropriations' and 'preceding applicable appropriation Act'
Sets up the statutory yardsticks: a lapse is a period where an account lacks an enacted full‑year appropriation, had funding in the prior applicable act, and has no continuing appropriation in effect. 'Preceding applicable appropriation Act' points to either the most recent continuing appropriation or, if none exists, the most recent full‑year appropriation for the immediately preceding fiscal year, excluding supplementals. These definitions determine the funding rate and legal authorities that carry forward under the automatic mechanism.
Creates the automatic appropriation and the 14‑day renewal cadence
Authorizes 'such sums as may be necessary' at the rate for operations found in the preceding applicable appropriation Act, available first for 14 calendar days and then extended in 14‑day increments if the lapse continues. That cadence imposes a predictable short‑term funding window rather than an open‑ended continuing resolution and establishes an operational rhythm for agencies, grantees, and budget offices to plan around during funding gaps.
Protects mandatory programs, prescribes availability, and charges expenditures
Requires entitlements and mandatory payments covered by prior Acts (and Food and Nutrition Act programs) to receive funding at the rate necessary to maintain program levels, under the prior Act’s authorities and conditions. Funds made available under the section are available until Congress enacts an appropriation or continuing act for the account, and all expenditures incurred under the automatic authority are to be charged to the applicable appropriation account once Congress enacts the year’s appropriations. The bill also waives apportionment timing limits for these funds but preserves other apportionment rules.
Prevents immediate large distributions and respects existing statutory funding rules
Bars programs that would normally receive large initial distributions or complete distributions (for example, front‑loaded state grants) from getting those up front under the automatic authority, and forbids awarding grants that would undercut Congress’s final funding decisions. It also requires implementation to use the 'most limited funding action' necessary. Finally, the automatic authority is subordinate to other law that explicitly provides or withholds funds for a program during a lapse.
Permits limited intra‑agency transfers with OMB sign‑off and committee notice
Gives agency heads, with OMB approval, authority to transfer funds made available under the section to other accounts within the same agency, subject to a 5 percent per‑account cap. Transfers can be used only to address higher‑priority needs and cannot fund items Congress expressly denied. Agencies must promptly notify the House and Senate Appropriations Committees of transfers, creating a formal notice and audit trail.
Prohibits restarting barred programs and adds the new section to title 31
Explicitly bars the statute’s automatic funds from being used to initiate or resume any program that Congress specifically prohibited in the previous fiscal year’s appropriation. The section also includes the clerical amendment inserting §1311 into the table of sections for chapter 13, formally adding the new mechanism to the U.S. Code.
Budgetary treatment under BBEDCA and effective date
Directs that the automatic sums be treated for scoring and enforcement under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 as discretionary and as part‑year appropriations for discretionary limit enforcement; it also adjusts the timing for required BBEDCA reports during a lapse. The Act takes effect on September 30, 2025.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal agencies and program managers — They avoid abrupt stoppages of operations and can keep services running on a predictable 14‑day cadence, reducing emergency stand‑up costs and legal complexities tied to shutdown workarounds.
- Recipients of entitlements and mandatory payments (e.g., SNAP recipients, veterans, beneficiaries of mandatory programs) — The bill directs funding at levels necessary to maintain program operations, minimizing interruptions in benefit delivery.
- State and local grantees performing incumbent functions — They receive continuity of funding flows (subject to the bill’s limits on large upfront distributions), reducing interruption risk for ongoing programs.
Who Bears the Cost
- Congressional appropriators — The automatic mechanism reduces the immediacy of shutdown leverage, potentially weakening Congress’s bargaining position and complicating oversight tools that relied on lapse pressure.
- Office of Management and Budget and agency budget offices — OMB and agency staff will shoulder extra operational burdens: approving transfers, tracking 14‑day renewals, notifying committees, and reconciling expenditures to eventual appropriations.
- Taxpayers and budget enforcers — Treating automatic sums as discretionary and part‑year appropriations could alter baseline calculations and discretionary limit enforcement, with potential downstream effects on deficit measurements and budget discipline.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill resolves the immediate problem of service disruptions by removing shutdowns as an enforcement tool, but in doing so it forces a trade‑off between uninterrupted program delivery and Congress’s constitutional power of the purse: guaranteeing continuity limits legislators’ leverage to shape final funding decisions and shifts consequential discretion to OMB and agency officials.
The statute puts an automatic safety net in place, but the language leaves several operational and legal questions open. The directive to make available 'such sums as may be necessary, at the rate for operations' relies on the prior applicable appropriation’s language and authorities; in practice, agencies and OMB will need detailed rules to translate prior‑year authorities into specific funding ceilings and permissible activities during successive 14‑day periods.
The broad prohibition on 'high initial rates of operation or complete distribution' protects Congress’s final allocation power but uses vague language that will require interpretation—what counts as impinging on 'final funding prerogatives' is not defined and could trigger disputes between appropriators and agencies.
On the budget side, instructing scorekeepers to treat the automatic sums as discretionary and as part‑year appropriations reshapes baseline and enforcement mechanics under BBEDCA. That treatment reduces the visibility of the fiscal impact of continuing automatic funding and could produce scoring inconsistencies across accounts, especially for programs with demand‑driven costs.
Finally, the transfer authority (OMB approval and a 5 percent cap) gives the executive a limited but meaningful way to reallocate during lapses; combined with the policy of taking the 'most limited funding action' this creates tension between administrative pragmatism and congressional control over priorities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.