HB5513 would amend Section 603(i)(1)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize subsidies for investments in processes, materials, techniques, or technologies, including software for asset management, software for operational analysis, and advanced digital construction management systems. The bill ties these subsidies to projects that address water-efficiency goals, energy-efficiency goals, and stormwater management, and to projects that are cost-effective and sustainably planned, designed, and constructed.
This is a substantive expansion of the subsidy toolkit, shifting some emphasis toward technology-enabled approaches to water quality and infrastructure resilience.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds software for asset management, software for operational analysis, and advanced digital construction management systems to the list of eligible subsidized technologies under 603(i)(1)(B).
Who It Affects
Municipal utilities, water infrastructure sponsors, and private vendors delivering these digital tools; engineering and construction firms working on water projects.
Why It Matters
It broadens federal support for digitized water infrastructure, potentially accelerating investments that improve water and energy efficiency and reduce stormwater impacts.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The proposed change to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act updates the subsidy framework to include modern software and digital tools as eligible investments. Asset management software, operational analytics software, and advanced digital construction management systems would qualify for subsidies when used to support projects that improve water efficiency, energy efficiency, or stormwater management, and when those projects are cost-effective and sustainably designed and built.
In practice, this means utilities and other project sponsors could seek federal support not just for hardware upgrades but for software platforms and digital services that enable smarter, data-driven management of water infrastructure. The measure signals a shift toward digitizing infrastructure planning, procurement, and operation, with an emphasis on sustainability and efficiency metrics.
Stakeholders across utilities, software vendors, and engineering firms should prepare for potential new eligibility criteria and project-approval processes. While the core goal is clearer environmental and efficiency gains, the policy will hinge on how “cost-effectiveness” and “sustainably planned” are defined and measured in implementation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds asset management software, operational analytics software, and advanced digital construction management systems to the list of subsidized technologies under Section 603(i)(1)(B).
Subsidies may support projects that improve water efficiency, energy efficiency, mitigate stormwater runoff, or pursue cost-effective, sustainably planned designs.
Projects must be cost-effective and sustainably planned, designed, and constructed to qualify for subsidies.
The amendment broadens the technology investments eligible for subsidization, signaling a digitization push for water infrastructure.
Introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Fong and Rep. Pappas, referred to Transportation and Infrastructure.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expanded eligibility for technology investments under FWPC Act
The amendment adds a broader category of tech investments to be subsidized under the FWPC Act, explicitly including software for asset management, software for operational analysis, and advanced digital construction management systems, as part of the “process, material, technique, or technology” eligible for subsidies. This broadens the toolkit beyond traditional hardware by recognizing data-driven and software-enabled approaches as valid infrastructure investments. The provision ties these technologies to goals around water efficiency, energy efficiency, stormwater management, and sustainability, while maintaining a requirement that projects be cost-effective and sustainably planned, designed, and constructed. The change signals a policy shift toward digitization and performance-based subsidies in water infrastructure, with implementation and oversight to be determined under existing FWPC Act processes.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Municipal and regional water utilities pursuing efficiency upgrades or resilience projects, now eligible to subsidize tech investments that improve operations and planning
- Private sector vendors supplying asset management software, analytics tools, and digital construction management platforms who can participate in subsidy-funded projects
- Engineering and construction firms delivering digitized water infrastructure projects, expanding their project scope and potential subsidies from federal programs
- State and local infrastructure agencies managing subsidy programs and project portfolios, gaining broader options to fund tech-enabled solutions
- Industrial and commercial water users implementing efficiency or stormwater projects that align with policy goals
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal subsidy outlays and potential budgetary impacts that finance increased technology investments
- State and local project sponsors who must allocate funds or coordinate subsidy applications
- Software vendors and contractors investing in product development and integration to meet subsidy criteria
- Agency staff and contractors responsible for administering, auditing, and overseeing subsidy programs
- Utilities and project sponsors may incur upfront costs or require capital planning to adopt new digital tools
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Expanding subsidies to technology investments can accelerate modernization but raises questions about measurement, equity, and budget impact: how to demonstrate real, verifiable efficiency gains from software-enabled tools while ensuring fair access to federal support and avoiding unintended subsidies to vendors rather than end-users.
The expansion raises analytical questions about how agencies will assess “cost-effectiveness” and “sustainably planned” for a wide range of software and digital solutions. Verifying actual efficiency gains from asset management and analytics platforms can be complex, requiring robust measurement and reporting.
There is also a risk that subsidies could disproportionately favor larger utilities or tech vendors with the capacity to develop and deploy sophisticated digital tools, potentially crowding out smaller operators lacking similar capabilities. The bill’s success will depend on clear implementation rules, transparent outcome metrics, and careful alignment with existing environmental and infrastructure programs to avoid duplicative funding or perverse incentives.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.