SB2388 would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the pilot program for alternative water source projects and to define and promote intelligent water infrastructure technology. The bill authorizes grants for engineering, design, construction, and testing of these projects, clarifies that costs for intelligent water infrastructure technologies are not counted as operation or maintenance, and requires annual reporting on grant activity and resilience outcomes.
It also increases the authorized funding and extends the reporting timeline, signaling a federal push to modernize water systems through data-driven approaches.
At a Glance
What It Does
Defines intelligent water infrastructure technology with broad categories (sensors, AI, real-time data, groundwater banking, advanced metering, and related tools) and authorizes grant use for engineering, design, construction, testing, and implementation of these projects.
Who It Affects
State and local water utilities, regional authorities, and private vendors implementing IWIT; federal program administrators and EPA program offices coordinating grants.
Why It Matters
Creates a clear statutory framework for deploying modern digital water-tech, supports resilience and efficiency, and aligns capital investments with data-driven operations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act expands the Federal Water Pollution Control Act by adding an expansive definition of intelligent water infrastructure technology. This definition covers real-time monitoring, data analytics, AI optimization, and digital tools used to manage wastewater collection, stormwater, and water distribution.
It also includes innovative approaches like groundwater banking and advanced metering, all intended to improve energy efficiency, reliability, and resiliency of water systems.
Key changes include a retooled grants program. Grants can be used for engineering, design, construction, and final testing of early-stage, IWIT-enabled alternative water source projects.
Importantly, the bill prohibits grant funds from being used for planning or ongoing operation and maintenance, but it clarifies that costs associated with intelligent water infrastructure technology are not considered O&M for purposes of the grant. The act also requires regular reporting to Congress on grant awards and the resilience gains achieved, with an initial report due within 180 days of enactment and subsequent annual updates.On funding and timeline, the act increases the authorized grant amount to $50 million and extends eligible program activity through 2028, up from prior limits.
Taken together, these provisions push utilities toward adopting advanced data-driven methods to bolster water security, reduce losses, and improve customer outcomes, while establishing accountability and oversight through mandated reporting.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines intelligent water infrastructure technology with components ranging from real-time sensors and AI optimization to groundwater banking and advanced metering.
Grants under the act may be used for engineering, design, construction, implementation, and testing of IWIT-enabled projects, specifically for alternative water sources.
Costs related to IWIT are excluded from being considered operation or maintenance, clarifying capital-focused funding treatment.
Funding for the program is increased to $50 million and the authorization is extended to 2028, expanding the program’s scale and timeline.
A mandatory reporting framework requires the Administrator to summarize grant awards and resilience improvements within 180 days of enactment and annually thereafter.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definition of Intelligent Water Infrastructure Technology
The bill adds a comprehensive definition of intelligent water infrastructure technology, including real-time monitoring, analytics, AI optimization, and remote sensing across wastewater, stormwater, and water supply. It also covers groundwater banking and data-driven design and construction management tools. These provisions establish the scope of the technology the program will support and signal the federal emphasis on data-enabled water systems.
Uses of Grants for IWIT Projects
Grants may be used for engineering, design, construction, and final testing of alternative water source projects that rely on IWIT. The text explicitly bars grants from being used for planning or ongoing operation and maintenance, aligning funding with capital expenditures. It also clarifies that costs tied to IWIT are not counted as O&M, ensuring capital budgeting treatment for these technologies.
Reports to Congress
The Administrator must deliver an initial report within 180 days of enactment and then annually, detailing awarded project grants and the resilience improvements achieved. The report also includes recommendations to enhance grant effectiveness, ensuring accountability and ongoing program refinement.
Funding and Timeline
The authorization amount for the grant program is increased to $50 million and the period covered extends to 2028. This change broadens program capacity, enabling more projects to leverage IWIT and accelerate modernization efforts.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.
Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Large and mid-sized water utilities that implement IWIT will gain access to capital for engineering, design, and construction, improving reliability and reducing losses.
- Disadvantaged communities could benefit from more reliable service and potential ratepayer protections tied to resilient infrastructure and more accurate metering.
- State environmental and public utility commissions gain a clearer framework and reporting to monitor progress and compliance with IWIT-related standards.
- Engineering firms and technology vendors specializing in sensors, data analytics, AI tools, and groundwater management stand to win as demand for IWIT solutions grows.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local governments may incur upfront administrative costs to apply for and manage IWIT grants.
- Water utilities may need to invest in integrating IWIT with legacy systems and training staff, representing capital expenditure and potential transition challenges.
- Federal agencies administering the program incur costs related to grant oversight, evaluation, and reporting.
- Technology vendors may face costs associated with compliance, cybersecurity, and interoperability requirements to meet grant criteria.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing the imperative to modernize water infrastructure with upfront costs and ongoing accountability, while ensuring that the intended opex capital treatment is applied consistently and that data governance and equity concerns are adequately addressed.
The bill’s push for intelligent water infrastructure technology hinges on upfront capital investments and the effectiveness of grant-based funding. While the approach could yield substantial efficiency gains and reduced losses, it also risks misalignment with existing budgets or delays if utilities struggle to adapt legacy systems.
The reliance on grants raises questions about long-term sustainability and whether ongoing O&M costs could shift if IAAs (indirectly) influence operations beyond the grant period. Data governance and cybersecurity considerations emerge as real-time sensing and analytics become more pervasive, potentially affecting ratepayer privacy and system security.
Additionally, the focus on grants for IWIT adoption creates potential disparities in distribution—wealthier utilities with more bandwidth to apply may outpace smaller communities. Oversight and evaluation must be robust to ensure resilience improvements translate into tangible, ongoing reliability and cost savings.
The balance between capital investments and ongoing maintenance, along with the need for interoperability across diverse water systems, remains a practical challenge for full-scale implementation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.