The Government Shutdown Efficiency Act gives the President the authority to sell federal real property during any lapse in appropriations. Proceeds from those sales may be used to pay the salaries and expenses of Federal officers or employees who are exempt from furlough during the lapse.
The bill also sets rules on how those funds are handled, including deposits to the general fund for deficit reduction and a potential use of sale proceeds to purchase Greenland. It prohibits selling federal property to certain foreign adversaries and defines key terms used in the act.
While aimed at maintaining government operations during funding gaps, the bill creates sweeping interactions with asset management, payroll timing, and long‑term property holdings.
At a Glance
What It Does
During a lapse in appropriations, the President may sell any federal real property and use proceeds to pay salaries and expenses for employees not furloughed. Sale activities related to this authority are treated as emergencies under existing law.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies managing real property, Federal officers and employees who remain on payroll, and the Treasury for handling proceeds and deficit reduction.
Why It Matters
It introduces a mechanism to sustain government operations during funding gaps by liquidating assets, while raising questions about asset stewardship, long‑term costs, and the policy trade‑offs of financing payroll with land sales.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act creates a new emergency-authorization pathway for the executive branch: if Congress has not funded operations, the President gains the power to sell real property owned by the federal government. The money from those sales can be used to cover the salaries and expenses of federal workers who are not furloughed during the lapse.
The sale activities are treated as emergencies for purposes of certain payroll and procurement laws, and backpay is explicitly denied for those paid during the lapse. Any proceeds recovered after the lapse ends must be deposited into the general fund to help reduce the deficit; the bill also allows those funds to be used for purchasing Greenland.
Definitions are provided for key terms, and the act bars sales to certain foreign adversaries. In sum, the bill pivots asset liquidation into a payroll-continuity mechanism with specific limits and policy signals, including a high-profile option to invest in Greenland for strategic purposes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill authorizes the President to sell federal real property during a lapse in appropriations.
Sale proceeds may be used to pay the salaries and expenses of non-furloughed Federal officers or employees.
Proceeds must be deposited in the general fund for deficit reduction; funds may also be used to purchase Greenland.
The bill defines key terms (Federal officer or employee, property, Indian Tribe) and deems sale-related services as emergencies under 31 U.S.C. 1342.
The President is prohibited from selling property to certain foreign adversaries (e.g.
North Korea, China, Russia, Iran or their entities).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This act may be cited as the Government Shutdown Efficiency Act. The short title establishes the formal name for referencing the bill in discussions and in potential future amendments.
Authority to Sell Federal Real Property During Lapse in Appropriations
During any partial or full lapse in appropriations for the executive branch, the President may sell any real property owned by the Federal Government and use sale proceeds to cover the salary and expenses of Federal officers or employees who are exempt from furlough during the lapse. Sold assets and related activities are treated as emergencies under 31 U.S.C. 1342. Proceeds received after the lapse ends must be deposited into the general fund for deficit reduction; a portion may be used to purchase Greenland. The section also defines the scope of who is considered a Federal officer or employee and what constitutes property, with specific exclusions.
Prohibition on Selling Federal Real Property to Foreign Adversary Countries
The President may not sell any federal real property to certain foreign adversaries, including North Korea, China, Russia, Iran, or any entity substantially controlled by those countries, ensuring national security considerations govern final dispositions of assets.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal officers or employees who are exempt from furlough and receive salaries during a lapse
- Federal agencies and property managers responsible for executing asset sales
- The U.S. Treasury and general fund managers overseeing deficit reduction
- Armed Forces members on active service during a lapse who are paid under the section
- The broader public interest in maintaining government operations during funding gaps
Who Bears the Cost
- Taxpayers funding potential asset liquidation and any long‑term impact on federal property holdings
- Federal agencies that incur transaction and administrative costs to execute sales
- Local communities or jurisdictions hosting sold federal properties that lose access to or impact from those assets
- Potential undervaluation or loss of strategic property if sales occur during a lapse
- Any administrative or legal costs associated with implementing the Greenland purchase provision
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether liquidating federal real property to fund payroll during funding gaps serves immediate continuity of government while risking the erosion of the federal property portfolio and potential long‑term costs, versus preserving property assets for future missions and avoiding destabilizing asset sales for short‑term budgetary needs.
The bill frontloads a dramatic shift in asset management by turning property sales into a revenue mechanism for payroll during funding gaps. This raises questions about the value and long-term utility of federal properties that may be liquidated under duress, and about how proceeds will be managed and monitored to prevent budgetary gaming or asset neglect.
The Greenland purchase proviso adds a geopolitical dimension to asset disposition that could complicate future fiscal planning and asset stewardship. Ongoing ambiguities include how property valuations are determined, what constitutes a sufficient lapse, and how the sale process would be conducted to ensure competitive and transparent disposal.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.