HB6144, titled the Male or Female Only Act, would prohibit federal agencies from soliciting or recording gender identity beyond male or female on forms, surveys, or documents. It also bars any option that indicates a gender identity other than male or female.
Within 60 days of enactment, agencies must update their forms, surveys, and documents to remove non-binary options and ensure compliance. This measure standardizes binary gender reporting across federal information collections and raises questions about data completeness, privacy governance, and the balance between uniformity and inclusivity for respondents.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires heads of agencies to prohibit any collection of gender identity beyond male or female on forms and related documents, and to reject non-binary responses. It also mandates a 60-day update of agency forms to eliminate non-binary options.
Who It Affects
All federal agencies that collect information via forms, surveys, or documents; form designers, data governance offices, and program teams that build or revise information collections; individuals who would have selected non-binary options.
Why It Matters
It creates a uniform binary standard across federal data collection, which affects how demographic data is gathered, stored, and reported and has implications for civil rights analysis, program evaluation, and privacy governance.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill requires every federal agency to stop collecting gender identity beyond a simple male-or-female option on forms and surveys. It directs agencies to reject any responses that indicate a gender outside the binary and to remove those options from current forms.
The 60-day update deadline places a tight administrative burden on agencies to revise forms, surveys, and any documents that solicit sex information. In practice, this means a government-wide move toward binary gender reporting, with potential ramifications for how demographic data is analyzed, how nondiscrimination programs are evaluated, and how individuals identify themselves in federal data collections.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill prohibits collecting gender identity beyond male or female on federal information collections.
Non-binary gender options are explicitly removed from federal forms, surveys, and documents.
Agencies must reject non-binary responses when information is collected.
There is a 60-day deadline to update all agency forms to comply with the prohibition.
The measure applies to all forms, surveys, and documents carried out by agency heads.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act as the 'Male or Female Only Act.' It establishes the bill’s formal name for reference and citation in congressional and agency communications.
Prohibition on non-binary gender data collection
This provision bars heads of agencies from soliciting or recording gender identity beyond male or female on any information collection. It also prohibits providing a non-binary option on forms, surveys, or documents and requires rejection of such responses.
Update deadline for agency forms
This subsection requires each federal agency to update its forms, surveys, and documents within 60 days of enactment to ensure alignment with the binary gender requirement and to remove non-binary options from all information collections.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Privacy across all five countries.
Explore Privacy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Agency forms and surveys teams gain a clear, uniform standard for data collection, reducing complexity in form design and data management.
- OMB and government-wide data standards offices benefit from a consolidated baseline for demographic data, simplifying governance and reporting.
- Federal program managers who rely on binary data for eligibility or reporting can move ahead with consistent, binary-only datasets.
- Congressional oversight committees gain a straightforward framework to monitor compliance and implementation across agencies.
Who Bears the Cost
- Individuals who identify as non-binary or who would have used non-binary gender options lose the ability to report a gender outside the binary on federal forms.
- Federal statisticians and researchers who rely on gender-diverse data for civil rights analysis or policy evaluation face data gaps and potential limitations in analyses.
- Programs and services that use gender binary metrics for eligibility or targeting may need to adjust data collection practices and reporting pathways.
- Civil rights advocacy groups may assess the measure as reducing visibility into gender diversity and potential impacts on equality monitoring.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Binary standardization versus inclusivity in gender data collection and the potential gaps this creates in civil rights monitoring and privacy-driven research.
The bill creates a clear data-collection standard that favors binary gender reporting. The main tension is between administrative simplicity and the government's ability to capture diverse gender identities for policy analysis and civil rights monitoring.
While it reduces complexity in data governance, it also forecloses non-binary reporting in federal data. Practical questions remain about how to handle existing data that used non-binary categories, how to reconcile this with state or program-level data requirements, and how agencies will address potential gaps in demographic information relevant to equal opportunity and privacy protections.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.