The Passport Sanity Act would prohibit the Department of State from issuing a passport, passport card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad that includes the unspecified X gender designation. It defines the documents that fall under the prohibition and requires that each application for such documents list only a male or female gender designation.
The bill is sponsored by Senator Roger Marshall and introduced in the 119th Congress on October 1, 2025. If enacted, the State Department would need to adjust forms and data fields to enforce a binary gender designation across these documents.
At a Glance
What It Does
Defines 'covered document' as a passport, passport card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad, and requires gender designation to be male or female, prohibiting the X designation.
Who It Affects
Applicants for passports, passport cards, and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad; the Department of State’s passport-issuing offices and related data systems.
Why It Matters
Sets a binary standard for core identity documents, potentially simplifying data handling for agencies while raising questions about inclusivity and international alignment.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill targets three specific types of federal identity documents—passports, passport cards, and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad—and subjects them to a binary gender rule. A new definition of a “covered document” ties these documents to the Department of State.
The core requirement is straightforward: every application for a covered document must include only a male or female gender designation, and the issuance of any document bearing an X designation is prohibited. The text does not specify penalties or enforcement mechanisms beyond the prohibition itself, but it would place the onus on the State Department to modify forms and data fields accordingly.
The sponsor is Senator Roger Marshall, with Republican cosponsors, and the bill sits at introduced stage in the 119th Congress. Implementers would need to adjust both paper and digital intake processes to ensure compliance.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a binary gender rule for three federal identity documents: passports, passport cards, and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad.
A new defined term, 'covered document,' frames which documents are subject to the prohibition.
The Secretary of State would need to ensure applications list only male or female designations.
The X gender marker would be prohibited on the issued documents under the bill.
There are no explicit penalties or exemptions stated in the text, leaving enforcement details to the existing administrative framework.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
The act may be cited as the Passport Sanity Act. It establishes the formal naming for the bill and sets the stage for its scope across the Department of State’s identity documents.
Prohibition on X gender designation
Section 2 defines a 'covered document' as a passport, passport card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad issued by the Department of State. It directs the Secretary of State to ensure each application for a covered document lists only a male or female gender designation and to prohibit issuing any covered document that uses the X designation. This creates a uniform binary framework for federal identity documents under the Department’s purview.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State Department passport processing operations benefit from a standardized data field, reducing variation in how gender is captured across forms and records.
- Customs and Border Protection and other DHS border agencies benefit from consistent identity data in traveler records, potentially simplifying screening workflows.
- Employers and background-screening firms benefit from stable, binary gender fields that align with many private-sector data systems.
- U.S. citizens who prefer or require a binary gender designation may experience clearer, more consistent documentation processes.
Who Bears the Cost
- Non-binary and gender-nonconforming travelers lose access to an official X designation on key documents, potentially impacting identity recognition in some contexts.
- LGBTQ+ advocacy groups may view the bill as limiting recognition of gender diversity in federal documents.
- International travelers whose countries recognize or require non-binary markers may face increased friction when transacting with U.S. identity documents.
- State Department IT and forms-management staff will incur costs to update systems, forms, and training to enforce the binary standard.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing a streamlined, uniform data model for identity documents against the evolving understanding of gender diversity and the potential for discrimination or exclusion of non-binary individuals.
The bill’s binary approach prioritizes administrative uniformity and potentially tighter data control in federal identity documents, but it also raises concerns about inclusivity and recognition of gender diversity. Implementing a binary policy would require updating forms, databases, and API interfaces used by consular services, background checks, and cross-border identity verification.
The absence of explicit penalties or exemptions creates ambiguity about enforcement and remedies for non-compliance, leaving it to existing administrative processes. Questions remain about how this policy would interact with international partners’ formats and with future shifts in federal civil rights considerations.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.