The bill amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign nationals from contributing or donating in connection with ballot initiatives and ballot referenda at the state or local level. In practical terms, it extends existing FECA prohibitions beyond federal elections to cover the financing of campaigns around ballot measures.
The prohibition applies to contributions and donations made on or after enactment, aligning the regulation of ballot measures with the federal framework for political contributions and reinforcing safeguards against foreign influence in the initiative process.
At a Glance
What It Does
It amends Section 319(a)(1)(A) of FECA to add, after “election,” a reference to state or local ballot initiatives and referenda, thereby prohibiting foreign nationals from contributing or donating in connection with those measures. The change becomes effective for contributions and donations made on or after enactment.
Who It Affects
State and local ballot measure committees, sponsors, and fundraising entities; donors who might attempt to fund ballot questions; and election administration bodies overseeing ballot initiatives.
Why It Matters
This creates a uniform prohibition against foreign involvement in ballot measures, closing potential gaps between federal and local election rules and strengthening public confidence in the integrity of direct democracy processes.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act expands the reach of the Federal Election Campaign Act to cover state and local ballot initiatives and referenda. Specifically, it inserts a reference to state and local ballot measures into the existing ban on foreign nationals making contributions or donations, so those measures cannot be financed by foreign nationals in the same way federal elections are restricted.
The prohibition applies to contributions and donations made on or after enactment, ensuring that future ballot questions cannot be funded by foreign individuals in the same manner as federal campaigns. The bill relies on FECA’s existing framework for defining and enforcing donor ineligibility, meaning enforcement would fall under the same authorities that oversee federal campaign finance violations.
It does not establish new penalties or alter other FECA rules, but it does extend their reach into the state and local ballot initiative space.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds state and local ballot initiatives and referenda to FECA’s prohibited donor list.
The prohibition covers foreign nationals’ contributions and donations connected with those ballot measures.
The amendment applies to contributions made on or after enactment.
Enforcement remains under FECA with the FEC as the usual enforcer.
There are no changes to the core definition of “foreign national” or to penalties beyond extending scope to ballot measures.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section provides the act’s official short title: the Protecting Ballot Measures From Foreign Influence Act of 2025. It establishes the label used in legal references and for cross-title coherence with FECA amendments.
Prohibition on foreign-national contributions for ballot measures
This section amends Section 319(a)(1)(A) of FECA to insert a reference to state or local ballot initiatives and referenda after the word “election.” The practical effect is to prohibit foreign nationals from contributing to or donating in connection with those ballot measures, on and after the date of enactment. This aligns the treatment of ballot measures with federal election prohibitions, extending federal-style donor restrictions to state and local ballot questions and tying enforcement to FECA’s existing framework.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Elections across all five countries.
Explore Elections in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State and local election officials overseeing ballots-benefit from clearer rules and reduced risk of foreign influence in local democracy.
- Ballot measure sponsors and campaigns at the state/local level gain a more level playing field against foreign-funded efforts.
- Voters participating in ballot measures benefit from the perceived integrity and independence of the process.
- Election watchdogs and civil-society groups gain a clearer basis to monitor compliance and influence operations.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local ballot measure committees bear additional compliance considerations and potential reporting obligations in line with FECA enforcement.
- Fundraising platforms and vendors that host ballot-measure campaigns may face more stringent scrutiny and need to ensure platform safeguards against foreign contributions.
- State and local election offices may incur administrative costs to align monitoring and enforcement with the expanded scope of FECA.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing the goal of preventing foreign influence in ballot measures with the risk of imposing additional compliance burdens on state/local campaigns and potentially chilling legitimate political participation.
The expansion raises practical questions about how foreign nationality is determined for donations tied to state and local ballot measures, and how verification would occur across dozens of jurisdictions with varying rules. While FECA provides a federal enforcement framework, the bill does not create new penalties or procedural requirements for state-level committees, so coordination with state election laws and potential conflicts could arise.
The broader policy effect is to reduce foreign influence channels in direct democracy, but implementation will rely on intergovernmental cooperation and consistent interpretation of “in connection with” ballot-initiative activities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.