This bill amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with ballot initiatives and referenda. It inserts the phrase “state or local ballot initiative or ballot referendum” after “election” in the existing statute, broadening the scope beyond federal elections.
The prohibition applies to contributions and donations made on or after the date of enactment. In short, it treats ballot questions at the subfederal level as subject to the same foreign influence restrictions that apply to elections.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends FECA to prohibit foreign nationals from contributing to or funding state and local ballot initiatives or referenda in connection with ballot measures. The amendment inserts the covered ballot mechanism into the statute and applies to contributions made on or after enactment.
Who It Affects
Campaign committees and donors involved in state or local ballot initiatives and referenda, as well as entities supporting or opposing such measures across jurisdictions.
Why It Matters
Closes a potential funding gap by ensuring foreign influence cannot skew ballot questions at the state or local level, creating a uniform standard across ballot-related fundraising.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act expands the current foreign-contributions ban to cover ballot initiatives and referenda at the state and local levels. By adding the words “state or local ballot initiative or ballot referendum” to the relevant section of FECA, the bill makes it unlawful for foreign nationals to contribute to or donate in connection with ballot measures.
The prohibition takes effect for contributions made on or after enactment, aligning ballot-measure fundraising with existing federal election restrictions. The bill does not, on its face, create new enforcement mechanisms beyond what FECA already prescribes; rather, it relies on the FECA framework to enforce this broader scope.
Practically, campaigns pushing or opposing ballot measures would need to verify donor eligibility and ensure compliance with the expanded rule.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill inserts “state or local ballot initiative or ballot referendum” into FECA’s prohibited-contributions trigger.
It prohibits foreign nationals from contributing or donating to ballot initiatives and referenda.
The prohibition applies to contributions made on or after enactment.
The change extends FECA’s reach to subfederal ballot processes.
Enforcement details are not specified in the bill text; FECA’s existing framework would apply.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act’s official name as the Protecting Ballot Measures From Foreign Influence Act of 2025, establishing a formal reference for citation and publication.
Prohibition on foreign nationals’ contributions in ballot initiatives and referenda
Section 319(a)(1)(A) of FECA is amended by inserting the phrase ", or a State or local ballot initiative or ballot referendum" after the word "+election+". The practical effect is to extend the existing ban on foreign national contributions in elections to include funding tied to ballot measures, ensuring that money used to influence ballot questions cannot come from foreign nationals.
Effective date
The amendment applies to contributions and donations made on or after the date of enactment. This creates a uniform starting point for the expanded prohibition across federal, state, and local ballot measures.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Elections across all five countries.
Explore Elections in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State and local ballot measure committees gain a clearer funding boundary, reducing foreign influence on campaign outcomes.
- U.S. voters gain increased assurance that ballot measures reflect domestic funding and deliberation rather than foreign involvement.
- Campaign finance watchdog groups obtain a more straightforward basis to evaluate balloting-related fundraising and potential foreign influence.
- The Federal Election Commission (FEC) and other enforcement bodies are empowered to enforce FECA’s rules within the expanded scope (using existing instruments).
- Domestic political audiences and civil society groups benefit from greater transparency and integrity in ballot-measure funding.
Who Bears the Cost
- Ballot-measure campaigns must implement due-diligence and donor verification to comply with the expanded prohibition.
- Campaigns may incur compliance and administrative costs to screen donors and maintain records for state and local ballot efforts.
- Platforms and payment processors involved in ballot-measure fundraising face added compliance and monitoring duties to prevent prohibited foreign contributions.
- State election authorities may see increased enforcement responsibilities and oversight costs.
- Foreign nationals seeking to influence ballot measures lose a potential channel for participation in funding.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central decision is whether extending FECA’s foreign-funding restrictions to state and local ballot measures adequately preserves the integrity of ballot questions without imposing excessive compliance costs or chilling legitimate domestic advocacy. The bill attempts a precise expansion, but the boundary between “in connection with” a ballot measure and unrelated activity remains a point of ambiguity that may invite disputes in enforcement.
The bill’s scope hinges on several practical questions that are not resolved within the text. The term foreign national, as used in FECA, is carried over to the new application, but the bill does not specify definitional nuances for emerging fundraising vehicles or intermediaries that might channel funds to ballot measures.
It also does not spell out enforcement procedures specific to state and local ballot measures, leaving enforcement to the FECA framework. Additionally, while the text clarifies coverage to state and local measures, it does not address cross-jurisdictional campaigns that pool resources across levels of government, which could complicate monitoring at the margins.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.