The PEERS Act amends Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make peer support services payable under Medicare when furnished at federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, community mental health centers, or certified community behavioral health clinics. It adds a statutory definition of ‘peer support services’ and of ‘peer support specialist,’ and ties specialist eligibility to a certification process consistent with national practice guidelines and SAMHSA core competencies.
This is the first federal proposal to create an explicit Medicare reimbursement category for nonclinical peer-delivered recovery supports. For providers and payers, it creates a new billing category and an operational pathway to integrate peers into care teams; for CMS it creates new coverage responsibilities and implementation questions about certification verification, payment rates, and program integrity safeguards.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends specific Medicare statutes to treat peer support services as covered when provided at designated facility types, defines the services and the peer support specialist role, and restricts Medicare payment to services furnished in those covered settings. It also authorizes state-based or Secretary-approved certification aligned with national guidelines.
Who It Affects
Medicare beneficiaries with mental health conditions or substance use disorders, peer workers seeking Medicare reimbursement for services, community mental health centers, FQHCs, RHCs, and certified community behavioral health clinics that could bill for peer services, and CMS as the payer and regulator.
Why It Matters
By putting peer support on Medicare’s payable-services map, the bill recognizes recovery-oriented, nonclinical services as part of reimbursable care and creates demand for certified peer workers. That expands federal involvement in workforce standards for peer services while raising implementation questions about payment methodology, certification consistency, and fraud control.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The PEERS Act inserts peer support services into Medicare’s statutory list of payable items when those services are delivered at certain facility types. Rather than creating a stand-alone Medicare provider type, the bill authorizes facilities that already participate in Medicare—FQHCs, RHCs, community mental health centers, and certified community behavioral health clinics—to furnish and have peer services counted as payable items.
This change requires updates to claims processing and provider guidance so facilities can bill Medicare for peer-delivered activities.
The bill gives a substantive, nontechnical definition of peer support services: a package of emotional, informational, instrumental, social and community supports aimed at recovery, community integration and self-determination, and targeted to individuals diagnosed with mental health conditions or substance use disorders. That framing keeps the service platform intentionally nonclinical, focused on empowerment and recovery goals rather than licensed clinical interventions.For the workforce, the statute defines a peer support specialist as a person in recovery who is certified under a process consistent with National Practice Guidelines for Peer Supporters and SAMHSA’s Core Competencies.
States are the primary certifying authorities, but the Secretary may approve an alternative certification route. In practice this means Medicare will tie payment eligibility to an individual’s certification status, and providers will need systems to verify credentials and track who is authorized to furnish reimbursable peer services.Finally, the bill also narrows what Medicare will pay for: it amends Medicare’s exclusion rules so services that meet the peer support definition are not payable if furnished outside the covered facility types.
The law takes effect for items and services on or after January 1, 2027. Operationally, that date gives CMS and providers a window to establish billing codes, develop payment rates, and set up verification and oversight mechanisms, but it also raises near-term questions about workforce readiness and geographic access where the specified facility types are sparse.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends Title XVIII to allow Medicare payment for peer support services when delivered at FQHCs, RHCs, community mental health centers, or certified community behavioral health clinics.
It defines peer support services as emotional, informational, instrumental, and social/community supports for beneficiaries diagnosed with mental health conditions or substance use disorders, with goals of recovery and community integration.
A peer support specialist must be a person in recovery and certified under either a State certification process or a Secretary-approved process that aligns with National Practice Guidelines and SAMHSA core competencies.
Medicare’s exclusion statute is modified to deny payment for peer support services furnished outside the listed facility types, effectively limiting reimbursement to those settings.
The statutory changes apply to services furnished on or after January 1, 2027.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title — PEERS Act of 2025
Provides the Act’s short title. This has no operational effect but establishes how the statute will be cited in subsequent regulatory guidance and implementation materials.
Add peer support services to payable community mental health center services
Modifies the list of services in 1832(a)(2)(J) to include peer support services when furnished by a community mental health center (as cross-referenced to the statutory definition). Practically, this signals CMS must treat peer services as part of the services portfolio for CMHCs and make corresponding updates to claims processing, provider enrollment descriptors, and any applicable encounter reporting.
Include peer support specialists among eligible personnel in RHCs/FQHCs
Alters the enumerated personnel language for rural health clinics and federally qualified health centers to permit services furnished by a peer support specialist. That change makes peer staff an explicitly recognized, billable category within RHC/FQHC staffing models, requiring billing, payroll, and credentialing workstreams to account for a nonlicensed workforce member.
Statutory definitions of peer support services and peer support specialist
Adds a two-part definition: (1) peer support services (scope, target population, and objectives) and (2) peer support specialist (recovery status plus certification tied to National Practice Guidelines and SAMHSA core competencies). By codifying both service scope and certification expectations, the provision sets the eligibility guardrails that CMS will use when authorizing payment and shaping future regulation or guidance.
Limit Medicare payment through exclusion modification
Inserts a new clause into Medicare’s exclusions to make clear Medicare will not pay for peer support services unless they are furnished by one of the listed covered facility types. In effect, this prevents ad hoc billing for peer services provided in noncovered settings, but it also excludes standalone peer-run programs that are not affiliated with the enumerated provider types from receiving Medicare reimbursement.
Start date for coverage
Specifies that all amendments apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2027. This sets a firm implementation horizon for CMS, states, and providers to align certification, billing, and oversight processes before peer services become payable.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Medicare beneficiaries with mental health conditions or substance use disorders — gain a new, reimbursable pathway to receive recovery-oriented, nonclinical supports through participating facilities, which could improve engagement and continuity of care.
- Peer support specialists — achieve federal recognition of their role when certified, opening opportunities for paid employment within Medicare-participating clinics and potential career advancement tied to standardized competencies.
- Community mental health centers, FQHCs, RHCs, and certified community behavioral health clinics — can add a reimbursable service line that may improve service mix, aid care coordination, and generate new revenue tied to recovery supports.
- State certification bodies and training organizations — see increased demand for credentialing and training programs, as states become the primary route for validating peer qualifications consistent with federal expectations.
Who Bears the Cost
- CMS and the Medicare trust funds — face incremental spending from a newly payable service and will incur administrative costs to update coverage rules, claims processing systems, and program integrity controls.
- Participating providers — must invest in credential verification, billing systems, training, and supervision frameworks to integrate peer specialists and ensure documentation meets Medicare requirements.
- States — may need to scale certification infrastructure and oversight if demand for peer certifications grows rapidly and if certification becomes a de facto gateway to Medicare reimbursement.
- Standalone peer-run organizations and community programs not affiliated with the enumerated facility types — will be excluded from Medicare reimbursement and may lose potential revenue unless they affiliate with covered providers.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill’s central dilemma is balancing two legitimate objectives: rapidly expanding federally reimbursable access to recovery-focused, peer-delivered supports versus creating consistent, enforceable standards that protect Medicare from variable qualifications, inappropriate clinical substitution, and billing abuses. Expanding access favors flexibility and state-led certification; protecting Medicare integrity pushes toward uniform federal standards and tighter supervision—there is no simple path that fully satisfies both aims.
Two implementation challenges stand out. First, the bill ties payment eligibility to certification but leaves considerable discretion about who certifies and how uniform those credentials must be: states may adopt widely varying standards or the Secretary may approve alternative processes.
That creates a risk of uneven qualification thresholds across the country, complicating CMS’s ability to set consistent payment and supervision expectations and increasing administrative burden for providers that operate in multiple states.
Second, the statute deliberately frames peer support as nonclinical recovery work, but the line between supportive and clinical interventions can be thin in practice. Without explicit limits on scope of practice, supervision requirements, and documentation standards, providers and auditors will have to develop new operational rules.
The exclusion that limits reimbursement to specific facility types reduces claims for ad hoc community-based peer work but also means beneficiaries who rely on peer-run or grassroots programs outside those settings may not benefit from Medicare coverage. Payment rates and program integrity controls are not specified, leaving CMS to reconcile access goals with fraud prevention and cost containment once the law is implemented.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.