The bill amends 38 U.S.C. §3736 to add a mandatory quarterly report from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs. Each quarterly submission must cover the prior quarter and provide counts of loans insured/guaranteed/made, denied applications, loans refinanced under specified statutory authorities, borrowers 60- and 90-days delinquent, and the Home Loan Guaranty Service’s full-time employee count.
This change increases the cadence and granularity of information available to congressional oversight committees. For VA operations and compliance officers, the bill creates a recurrent data-delivery obligation that will require reliable internal tracking of originations, denials, delinquencies, refinances under sections 3710(a)(8) and 3712, and staffing levels; agencies will need to align systems and clarify definitions to meet the new statutory standard.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends 38 U.S.C. §3736 by making the existing annual report a subsection and adding a new subsection that requires the Secretary to send a quarterly report to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs committees. The quarterly report must cover the quarter immediately preceding the submission and list counts of loans, denials, specified refinances, 60- and 90-day delinquencies, and Home Loan Guaranty Service FTEs.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Department of Veterans Affairs — specifically the VA Home Loan Guaranty Service — which must produce and certify the data. It also matters to members of Congress and their staff on the Veterans’ Affairs committees, veterans and their advocates who track program performance, and entities that interact with VA loan servicing and origination.
Why It Matters
The bill substantially increases congressional visibility into loan volume, borrower distress, and VA staffing on a quarterly cadence, enabling faster oversight and policy response. For VA administrators and compliance teams, it creates recurring reporting obligations and exposes operational metrics that could influence budget and legislative decisions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a new subsection into 38 U.S.C. §3736 to require quarterly reporting by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs. It does not replace the existing annual report; rather, it makes the annual report a distinct subsection and adds a separate, mandated quarterly filing that covers the prior quarter’s activity.
Each quarterly report must include six discrete data elements: the number of housing loans the Secretary insured, guaranteed, or made; the number of applications for housing loan benefits denied; the number of loans refinanced under section 3710(a)(8) or section 3712 (the statutory refinance authorities); the counts of veterans whose mortgage payments on VA-associated loans are at least 60 days late and at least 90 days late; and the number of full-time employees in the VA Home Loan Guaranty Service (or any successor office). The reporting requirement is limited to counts for the preceding quarter and is directed to the Congressional committees named in the statute; the bill does not require public posting, specify supporting breakdowns (e.g., by state or borrower demographic), or mandate analytic commentary.Operationally, the VA must assure that its data systems can produce consistent quarterly snapshots for these metrics.
That requires aligning definitional standards (for example, what constitutes an "application denied" versus an incomplete application), ensuring loan servicing feeds capture delinquency at 60- and 90-day thresholds, and being able to identify refinances done under the two statutory provisions cited. The bill also requires the VA to report headcount for the Home Loan Guaranty Service, which ties program activity to staffing levels and could inform committee questioning on resourcing.The text imposes no penalties or enforcement mechanism for late or inaccurate submissions and does not appropriate money to support the added reporting.
It therefore creates a statutory expectation of quarterly reporting without an explicit funding stream, leaving implementation to the VA’s internal allocations and existing reporting processes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends 38 U.S.C. §3736 by adding subsection (b), which mandates a quarterly report to the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs covering the quarter immediately preceding the submission.
Each quarterly report must include the number of housing loans insured, guaranteed, or made by the Secretary under the VA Home Loan program.
The report must list the number of applications for housing loan benefits denied by the Secretary and the number of loans refinanced under 38 U.S.C. §3710(a)(8) or §3712.
The statute requires the quarterly count of veterans who are at least 60 days delinquent and at least 90 days delinquent on mortgage payments tied to VA-insured, -guaranteed, or -made loans.
The VA must include the number of full-time employees in the VA Home Loan Guaranty Service (or any successor office) in each quarterly submission.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Adds a quarterly reporting obligation to 38 U.S.C. §3736
This section is the operative amendment: it retains the existing annual report but adds a new, standalone quarterly reporting duty. Drafting-wise, it accomplishes this by converting the current opening language for the annual report into subsection (a) and appending a new subsection (b) containing the quarterly requirements. For implementers, this is a structural change to an existing reporting provision rather than creation of an entirely new statute.
Preserves the annual report as a separate obligation
The bill explicitly leaves the annual report in place by designating it as subsection (a). That means Congress continues to receive whatever annual narrative and metrics the statute previously required (the bill does not alter the content of the annual report). Practically, the VA will have parallel reporting cycles to manage: an annual statutory product and the newly required quarterly counts.
Quarterly counts of loans, denials, and specified refinances
Subparagraphs (1)–(3) require specific counts: total loans insured/guaranteed/made; applications denied; and loans refinanced under sections 3710(a)(8) or 3712. The reference to 3710(a)(8) and 3712 ties the data to statutory refinancing authorities rather than to a descriptive refinancing category, which will require VA systems to tag refinances by legal authority. This is important for analysts who need to separate routine originations from programmatic refinance activity authorized under those specific statutes.
Delinquency thresholds and staffing headcount
Subparagraph (4) requires counts of borrowers at least 60 days and at least 90 days past due on mortgages tied to VA loans; subparagraph (5) requires the number of full-time employees in the Home Loan Guaranty Service. These two items link borrower distress signals to the agency’s workforce, giving committees the ability to correlate program stress with staffing levels. For VA operations, producing accurate delinquency snapshots at those exact thresholds and a consistent FTE count will be an ongoing administrative requirement.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs — gain faster, regular visibility into loan volumes, denials, refinances, delinquencies and staffing that supports more timely oversight and targeted inquiries.
- Veterans advocacy organizations — receive a stronger factual basis (via committees) for pressing policy fixes when quarterly data surfaces rising delinquencies or denial patterns.
- Congressional appropriations and budget staff — can use the quarterly counts and staffing numbers to assess whether resources for the Home Loan Guaranty Service align with program demand and to justify budgetary adjustments.
- Market analysts and secondary-market participants (indirect) — while the reports go to committees, greater congressional visibility can prompt hearings or disclosures that ultimately reduce uncertainty about VA loan program trends.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Veterans Affairs — must allocate staff time and systems capacity to produce validated quarterly counts and maintain the records that support them, with no appropriation in the bill to fund the new workload.
- VA Home Loan Guaranty Service operations and data teams — face recurring operational burden to ensure loan origination, servicing, delinquency triggers, refinance tags, and headcount reporting align with statutory definitions and can be produced on a quarterly schedule.
- Contracted loan servicers and originators (indirectly) — may face ad hoc data requests or increased operational scrutiny from VA as the department tightens its internal reporting and quality-control processes to meet the statutory standard.
- Veterans (potentially) — could experience downstream effects if committees respond to reported metrics with policy or programmatic changes, or if the VA modifies operational practices (e.g., stricter application processing) to improve reported indicators.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between congressional demand for frequent, operationally useful data to enable prompt oversight and the VA’s capacity and need for flexible program administration: tighter reporting improves visibility and accountability, but it imposes recurring data, definitional, and staffing burdens that can divert resources from borrower-facing services and invite narrow performance incentives that distort operational choices.
The bill creates a clear oversight tool but leaves several implementation details unaddressed. It prescribes counts without defining key terms — for example, what specifically qualifies as an "application denied," how to classify partial denials, or whether moratoria and loss-mitigation arrangements affect 60- and 90-day delinquency counts.
Those gaps require VA rulemaking or internal guidance to ensure consistent, defensible reporting. Without standardized definitions, quarterly figures could shift because of accounting changes rather than underlying program performance.
The statute also mandates reporting to congressional committees but does not require public release, nor does it provide funding or enforcement measures for late or inaccurate submissions. That combination creates a risk that the VA will deprioritize the new quarterly product when resources are tight, or that committees will demand informal supplementary data to interpret the counts.
There are also privacy and operational risks: frequent reporting of granular counts — particularly if committees request geographic or small-cell breakdowns later — could raise veteran confidentiality concerns and increase administrative overhead as the VA suppresses or aggregates small numbers to prevent identifiability.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.