The bill amends title 38 to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to deliver an annual report to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees on the National Cemetery Administration (NCA). The report must be submitted one year after enactment and annually thereafter, and the statute enumerates specific elements the report must include.
This change forces routine, publicized disclosure of operational data — including detailed interment counts, customer satisfaction assessment, maps of federal and grantee cemeteries, summaries of construction projects, and a breakdown of grants made under federal programs. For oversight staff, cemetery operators, and planners, the bill converts ad hoc information flows into a regular, standardized reporting obligation that the public will be able to review on a VA website.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new statutory section requiring an annual NCA report to congressional Veterans’ Affairs committees, listing 12 required elements such as interment counts (by cemetery, eligibility category, and by casketed vs cremated), construction project summaries, grant details, and maps. The report must be posted in digital form on a VA website.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Department of Veterans Affairs — specifically the National Cemetery Administration and data/reporting teams — and organizations that receive cemetery grants under 38 U.S.C. §2408 or Public Law 116–107. Congress, state and tribal cemetery operators, veterans’ families, and researchers will use the published material.
Why It Matters
It institutionalizes transparency and creates a predictable information stream for oversight, resource planning, and public accountability. The reporting requirements also create new internal data‑collection and publication work for the VA and its grantees.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a new section into chapter 24 of title 38 that obligates the Secretary to deliver a comprehensive annual report on the National Cemetery Administration to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees. The first report is due within one year of enactment and then every year after that.
The statute does not tie the report to a specific fiscal or calendar year convention beyond saying “the period covered by the report,” so the VA will need to choose and document its reporting period.
The law specifies discrete data items the VA must include. It requires total interment counts and instructs the VA to break those counts down by each open national cemetery and by the statutory eligibility categories listed in 38 U.S.C. §2402(a)(1)–(10).
The interment totals must separately list casketed and cremated remains, and the VA must also report the number of interments of unclaimed veteran remains by cemetery. The bill also asks for a customer‑satisfaction assessment, which the VA will have to define and measure consistently across sites.On infrastructure and support, the report must include maps of every national cemetery the VA controls and of veterans’ cemeteries owned by states, counties, or tribal organizations that received grants under §2408, including those on tribal trust land.
The VA must list completed major and minor construction projects and describe planned projects for the upcoming fiscal year. For grants, the VA must disclose each grant under §2408 and Public Law 116–107, including recipient, amount, and intended use.
The statute closes by allowing the Secretary to include any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate and requires the VA to publish the report in digital form on a public VA website.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The report is due within one year of enactment and then annually to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees.
Interment counts must be disaggregated by each open national cemetery, by the ten eligibility categories in 38 U.S.C. §2402(a)(1)–(10), and by casketed versus cremated remains.
The VA must publish a map of each national cemetery and of state/county/tribal veterans’ cemeteries that received grants under 38 U.S.C. §2408, including tribal trust land sites.
For grants (under §2408 and Public Law 116–107) the report must identify each recipient, the grant amount, and the grant’s purpose.
The report must summarize completed and planned major and minor construction projects at NCA cemeteries and include a customer‑satisfaction assessment, all posted digitally on a public VA website.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Declares the Act’s short title: the 'National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026.' This is purely a caption, but it frames the statutory insertion that follows and the subject of future rulemaking or guidance.
Annual reporting obligation
Adds a new subsection that requires the Secretary to submit a report to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees within one year of enactment and annually thereafter. Practically, this creates a recurring deadline the VA must calendar and staff for, and it converts what has often been ad hoc information sharing into a statutory product that Congress can expect each year.
Detailed interment statistics, including unclaimed remains
Mandates granular interment totals: totals for all interments, broken out by each open national cemetery, by the statutorily enumerated eligibility categories in §2402(a)(1)–(10), and by casketed vs. cremated remains. Paragraph (9) separately requires counts of interments of unclaimed veteran remains by cemetery. These data points will require the NCA to standardize recordkeeping across facilities to ensure comparability.
Customer satisfaction, maps, and burial-option descriptions
Requires a customer‑satisfaction assessment (the bill does not define the metric), maps of each national cemetery and of eligible state/county/tribal cemeteries that received §2408 grants (including tribal trust land), and descriptions of burial options available at each open national cemetery. The map and burial‑option elements push the VA to produce site‑level, publicly searchable information useful for families and planners, but they also require coordination with grantees and potential GIS capability.
Memorials, construction projects, and grant transparency
Directs the VA to report counts of Presidential memorial certificates, headstones, markers, and medallions, disaggregated by eligibility category and cemetery location. It also requires summaries of major and minor construction projects completed during the period and descriptions of planned projects for the coming fiscal year. For grants, the VA must list each grant under §2408 and Public Law 116–107 and provide recipient, amount, and intended use. These provisions create a public record linking capital investments and grant funding to specific sites and purposes.
Publication format
Requires that each report be made available in digital form on a public VA website. The statute mandates online publication but does not prescribe file formats, machine‑readability, or API access — leaving implementation choices to the VA, which will affect how readily outside parties can ingest and analyze the data.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Members and staff of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees — gain predictable, standardized data and narratives they can use for oversight, budget requests, and legislative work.
- Veterans and families planning interment — get maps, burial‑option descriptions, and public counts to help with funeral planning and site selection.
- State, county, and tribal cemetery operators who receive §2408 grants — public listing of grants and purposes can help justify funding and coordinate with the VA for project planning and visibility.
- Researchers, journalists, and policy analysts — will have a recurring public dataset and documentation useful for trend analysis on interments, infrastructure, and service quality.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Veterans Affairs / National Cemetery Administration — must allocate staff time and systems to collect, validate, and publish the enumerated data annually, including maps and construction summaries.
- Local cemetery administrators and NCA field staff — will carry much of the data‑collection burden and may need to change recordkeeping practices to meet the statute’s disaggregation and consistency requirements.
- Grant recipients (state/tribal/county cemeteries) — may need to provide standardized reports or GIS information to the VA to ensure their sites and grant uses are accurately reflected, imposing administrative costs.
- Congressional and oversight offices — while beneficiaries of transparency, they may request follow‑up data or hearings, increasing workload for both staff and the VA in the absence of clarifying guidance or additional resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between accountability through granular, public data and the operational and privacy costs of producing that data: the bill increases transparency for oversight and family planning but shifts significant data‑collection, validation, and publication burdens onto the VA and grantees without specifying standards or funding to do the job well.
The statute prescribes a detailed laundry list of items but leaves several key implementation decisions to the Secretary. It does not define the VA’s reporting period (fiscal vs. calendar year), set data standards or file formats, or require machine‑readable outputs; the absence of those specifications means the VA can comply with minimal, hard‑to‑aggregate formats unless Congress or the VA prescribes standards.
The customer‑satisfaction requirement is similarly vague — without mandated survey instruments or baseline metrics, the assessments will likely lack comparability across years and sites unless the VA formalizes a consistent methodology.
The bill also creates practical trade‑offs between transparency and operational strain. Disaggregating interment data by cemetery, eligibility category, and disposition (casketed vs. cremated) is valuable for planners but requires standardized, validated records at the point of service.
Smaller state or tribal grantees may lack the systems to produce GIS maps or to report granular data without technical assistance. Finally, public maps and site lists improve access but could raise privacy or security concerns if not carefully managed, and reporting on unclaimed remains intersects with state rules and sensitivities about identification and next‑of‑kin efforts.
Notably, the statute imposes no penalties or enforcement mechanism for late or incomplete reports; the primary remedy is oversight appetite from Congress.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.