The POST IT Act of 2025 amends section 30 of the Small Business Act to require the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to add, "to the extent practicable," hyperlinks on its website to any agency guidance that sets out policy or interpretations for rules that have an associated small entity compliance guide under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). The bill also clarifies that guidance exempt from disclosure under FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)) need not be made public and states that implementation must occur without additional appropriations.
This is a narrow, operational transparency measure aimed at improving small businesses' access to interpretive and policy guidance tied to covered rules. For regulated small entities, compliance advisers, and agency compliance teams, it changes where they will expect to find interpretive materials and creates a modest website‑maintenance obligation for the Ombudsman and potentially for agencies that prepare guidance references.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends 15 U.S.C. 657 to add a paragraph directing the Ombudsman to publish hyperlinks to guidance that "sets forth policy" or interprets statutory, regulatory, or technical issues for rules that have SBREFA small entity compliance guides. It also adds an explicit carve‑out for FOIA‑exempt information and states no new appropriations are authorized.
Who It Affects
Small businesses subject to federal rules with SBREFA small entity compliance guides, the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman (within SBA), federal agencies that produce guidance tied to those rules, and compliance professionals who track interpretive materials.
Why It Matters
It centralizes discovery of interpretive guidance for a subset of agency rules, reducing search friction for small entities and their advisers. Because the statute requires links rather than copies and contains a FOIA exemption and a funding prohibition, implementation will be procedural and resource‑sensitive rather than transformational.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The POST IT Act modifies the Small Business Act's section governing the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman so the office will, where practicable, post hyperlinks on its website to guidance documents that explain policy or interpret statutory, regulatory, or technical issues for rules that also have SBREFA small entity compliance guides. The change is targeted: it applies only to guidance that is designed to set forth policy or interpretation for rules covered by the SBREFA provision referenced in the bill.
The bill prevents disclosure of any material that agencies would not otherwise have to disclose under FOIA, meaning the Ombudsman does not have to publish links to guidance that contains FOIA‑exempt information. The law also includes an applicability clause: the new hyperlink requirement applies only to guidance on rules for which an agency produces a SBREFA small entity compliance guide on or after the bill's enactment date.
That excludes guidance tied to rules for which a compliance guide was produced before enactment.Practically, the statute instructs the Ombudsman to act as a central pointer to interpretive materials: it does not direct the office to host or vet the guidance content, only to provide links where practicable. Finally, the act makes clear there is no new funding authorized, so the Ombudsman and involved agencies must absorb any web‑publication, coordination, or maintenance work within existing budgets and resources.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds paragraph (3) to 15 U.S.C. 657(e), requiring the Ombudsman to provide, "to the extent practicable," hyperlinks to guidance that sets forth policy or interprets statutory, regulatory, or technical issues for certain rules.
The linkage duty applies only to rules for which an agency produces a SBREFA small entity compliance guide described in section 212(a)(1) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, and only for guides produced on or after the bill's enactment.
The statute explicitly preserves FOIA protections: the Ombudsman need not make public any information exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
The bill requires links (pointers) rather than copies or hosting of guidance, leaving substantive control of the guidance with the producing agency.
Section 3 states that no additional appropriations are authorized, so implementation must occur within existing agency and Ombudsman resources.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title — 'POST IT Act of 2025'
Designates the bill as the "Providing Opportunities to Show Transparency via Information Technology Act of 2025" or the "POST IT Act of 2025." This is a stylistic provision with no operational effect beyond naming the statute.
Website hyperlink requirement for Ombudsman
Amends subsection (e) of section 30 of the Small Business Act by inserting a new paragraph (3) directing the Ombudsman, "to the extent practicable," to post hyperlinks to guidance that is intended to set forth policy or interpret statutory, regulatory, or technical issues for any rule that has a SBREFA small entity compliance guide. The mechanics are limited: the language requires links, not hosting or content vetting, and uses the practicality qualifier to allow flexibility in implementation.
FOIA carve‑out for confidential information
Adds a new subsection (g) clarifying that the website requirement does not compel public availability of information exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). This preserves existing statutory exemptions and reduces the risk that agencies must publish sensitive or protected material to comply with the hyperlink requirement.
Applicability tied to SBREFA compliance guides
Specifies that the new paragraph (3) applies only to guidance on, or interpretations of, rules for which an agency produces a SBREFA small entity compliance guide under section 212(a)(1) on or after the act's enactment. In practice, this temporal cutoff limits the statute's reach to future SBREFA guides and leaves prior guides and their linked guidance outside the new obligation.
Compliance with CutGO — no new appropriations
States that no additional amounts are authorized to carry out the Act or its amendments. That places the operational burden of adding and maintaining hyperlinks on existing agency and Ombudsman budgets, potentially slowing rollout or constraining the scope of maintenance and discovery features the office can offer.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Small businesses subject to rules with SBREFA compliance guides — they gain a centralized starting point (hyperlinks) for finding agency interpretive guidance, reducing time and search costs when interpreting regulatory obligations.
- Compliance officers and small‑firm counsel — improved discoverability of interpretive materials can speed legal review and reduce uncertainty when advising clients or preparing compliance plans.
- Trade associations and small business advocates — easier access to guidance may improve member support and allow quicker identification of ambiguous agency interpretations that warrant comment or challenge.
Who Bears the Cost
- The Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman (SBA) — must add and maintain hyperlinks and coordinate with agencies within existing resources, which creates ongoing web‑administration and outreach work.
- Federal agencies that produce SBREFA small entity compliance guides — may need to ensure guidance is linkable, clearly labeled, and kept current for inclusion; agencies also must coordinate with the Ombudsman's office without new appropriations.
- Information technology and web operations within SBA and producing agencies — must handle link management, potential metadata or search improvements, and address link rot, all funded from current budgets.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between making agency policy interpretations more discoverable for small entities and keeping administrative obligations—and the risk of exposing sensitive material—manageable for the Ombudsman and agencies: greater transparency helps compliance but requires resources and clear boundaries; the statute leans toward low‑cost transparency (links, FOIA carve‑outs) at the expense of comprehensive, curated, or retroactive coverage.
The statute's usefulness depends heavily on three practical limits. First, the requirement applies only "to the extent practicable," a flexible standard that gives the Ombudsman discretion to prioritize or delay postings; critics may view that phrase as rendering the requirement hortatory unless the Ombudsman commits resources.
Second, the applicability cutoff — only for SBREFA guides produced on or after enactment — means the act does not retroactively centralize guidance for existing rules. Many small businesses face legacy rules, so coverage will grow only as agencies produce new SBREFA guides.
Third, the law directs links rather than copies and explicitly preserves FOIA exemptions. That reduces legal risk but creates operational questions: who certifies that a linked item is the correct interpretive guidance, how will link integrity be maintained, and how should the Ombudsman handle guidance that agencies characterize as non‑policy or internal?
Because no new appropriations are authorized, implementation choices (degree of curation, search tools, archival practices) will depend on existing staffing and IT capacity, which could produce inconsistent user experiences across agencies and over time.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.