This resolution (H.Res. 830) provides for immediate consideration of H.R. 999, a bill intended to protect an individual’s ability to access contraception and to shield health-care providers from impediments in providing contraception and related information.
The resolution waives points of order against consideration, requires the bill to be treated as read on adoption, and sets limits on debate and amendments: one hour of debate, equally divided between the chair and the ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or their designees; and one motion to recommit. It also directs that the bill be considered with minimal procedural friction and that the prior question be ordered to final passage without intervening motion, subject to the stated exceptions.Section 2 exempts H.R. 999 from certain procedural constraints (Clause 1(c) of Rule XIX and Clause 8 of Rule XX) for the purposes of its consideration, and Section 3 requires the Clerk to transmit to the Senate a message announcing passage no later than one week after passage.
At a Glance
What It Does
The House shall immediately proceed to the consideration of H.R. 999 upon adoption of the resolution. Points of order against consideration are waived and the bill is treated as read. The previous question is ordered to final passage with a fixed, limited debate and a single motion to recommit.
Who It Affects
House members and staff involved in floor proceedings, particularly the chair and ranking member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and their designees, the Clerk, and the House as a whole during the floor debate.
Why It Matters
This sets a tight, expedited path for H.R. 999’s consideration, narrowing debate and amendment opportunities while ensuring rapid Senate notification. It signals a priority on contraception-access policy and alters normal legislative scrutiny and workflow.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill is a procedural tool, not substantive legislation, aimed at accelerating the floor consideration of H.R. 999. It directs the House to move immediately to debate and vote on the bill once the resolution is adopted.
All points of order against the bill’s consideration are waived, and the bill is deemed read when the consideration begins. The resolution also provides a tightly controlled debate window—one hour total, split between the chair and ranking member—and a single motion to recommit, limiting opportunities for delaying tactics or extensive amendments.
Additionally, the measure excludes H.R. 999 from certain typical procedural constraints under Rules XIX and XX, to streamline its path to the floor. Finally, the Clerk is required to transmit a Senate message indicating passage no later than one week after the House acts, ensuring prompt Senate awareness and potential follow-through.In short, this is about speed and efficiency: reduce procedural friction, constrain debate, and push a contraception-related bill toward a quick outcome.
It is a procedural decision with real implications for how quickly the content of H.R. 999 can be debated and advanced, and what kind of amendments or objections might be feasible within the narrow debate window.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution is a procedural vehicle to set how H.R. 999 will be considered on the House floor.
All points of order against consideration are waived.
The bill will be treated as read upon the start of floor consideration.
Debate is capped at one hour, with an even split between the chair and ranking member.
The Clerk must transmit a Senate message no later than one week after passage.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Immediate consideration and waiver of points of order
Upon adoption, the House shall proceed to consider H.R. 999. All points of order against consideration are waived, the bill is considered as read, and the prior question is ordered to final passage with limited opportunities for delay or amendment. The only exceptions to this streamlined path are a one-hour debate split between the chair and the ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce (or their designees) and a single motion to recommit.
Rule exemptions for consideration
Clause 1(c) of Rule XIX and Clause 8 of Rule XX shall not apply to the consideration of H.R. 999. This removes standard procedural hurdles that would otherwise govern floor debate and amendment procedures for the bill, aiding faster movement to final passage.
Transmission to the Senate
The Clerk must transmit to the Senate a message that the House has passed H.R. 999 no later than one week after passage. This ensures expedited inter-chamber communication and a prompt transition to Senate consideration, if pursued.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Office of the Sponsor (Rep. Fletcher) gains procedural momentum to advance H.R. 999.
- House floor managers and committee leadership (Energy and Commerce) gain a clear, limited framework for guiding debate and amendments.
- Supporters and advocacy groups favoring contraception access benefit from a faster floor timeline and a resolute posture toward passage.
- Committee on Energy and Commerce staff gain operational clarity and reduced complexity in scheduling floor actions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Members seeking to offer amendments may be constrained by a one-hour debate cap.
- Opponents of H.R. 999 may perceive reduced opportunity for counterpoints or thorough scrutiny of the bill.
- House Rules Office and the Clerk’s office bear increased administrative burden to implement tight timelines and ensure timely Senate transmission.
- Some interest groups favoring longer deliberation may view the expedited process as reducing deliberative legitimacy.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The core dilemma is speed versus deliberation: expediting the bill’s consideration can enhance policy responsiveness, but it can also curtail amendments, minority input, and thorough scrutiny that typically accompany major policy changes.
The resolution accelerates consideration of H.R. 999 by removing typical procedural obstacles and imposing a tight debate window. This creates a policy tension between expediting legislation and preserving thorough legislative scrutiny.
While the approach can deliver timely policy debate and potential passage on contraception access, it also narrows the opportunity for lawmakers to propose and negotiate amendments, which could affect the bill’s ultimate form and the robustness of debate. There is also a practical risk that a rushed process reduces the Senate’s ability to respond with deliberation, should concerns or need for refinement be raised during floor debate.
The central challenge is balancing speed with deliberation: the resolution prioritizes quick action over exhaustive floor debate and amendment consideration. If H.R. 999 contains complexities or controversial provisions, the one-hour cap may limit meaningful engagement and reduce minority input, potentially shaping the policy in ways that reflect fewer views from the full membership.
The reliance on a formal transmission to the Senate within a week also compresses the inter-chamber negotiation timeline, which could affect subsequent legislative dynamics.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.