The Major Richard Star Act amends Title 10 to allow members and former members retired under chapter 61 for disability to receive both retired pay and veterans’ disability compensation when the disability is combat-related. The change removes the effect of the offsets found in 38 U.S.C. §§ 5304 and 5305 for those cases and revises the statutory text governing concurrent receipt and Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) eligibility.
This is a targeted expansion of concurrent receipt that applies only to combat-related disabilities as defined in 10 U.S.C. 1413a(e). For affected retirees it increases monthly income and simplifies benefit interactions; for the Department of Defense and Treasury it increases gross outlays and requires administrative updates to payment systems and eligibility determinations.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts explicit language into 10 U.S.C. 1413a(b)(3) and rewrites 10 U.S.C. 1414(b) to ensure that Chapter 61 disability retirees who qualify for VA compensation for a combat-related disability may be paid both retired pay and VA compensation without applying the reductions in 38 U.S.C. §§ 5304 and 5305. It also makes technical edits removing an earlier concurrent-receipt phase-in framework and renumbers subsections for clarity.
Who It Affects
Directly affects chapter 61 disability retirees whose disabilities are classified as combat-related under 10 U.S.C. 1413a(e), administrators at DoD and VA who adjudicate and pay benefits, and Treasury because of changed payment flows. Veterans Service Organizations and benefits counsel will also see increased demand to advise and re-certify eligibility.
Why It Matters
The change converts a legal offset into an entitlement for a defined subset of retirees, raising net disposable income for qualifying veterans and creating recurring federal outlays. It clarifies the interaction between CRSC/CRDP concepts and chapter 61 retirements, reducing legal ambiguity but increasing administrative and budgetary obligations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill targets a narrow but important group: service members retired for disability under chapter 61 whose disability the law recognizes as combat-related. Under current law, VA disability compensation can reduce military retired pay in certain circumstances via 38 U.S.C. §§ 5304–5305.
This Act amends Title 10 to say that, for chapter 61 retirees with combat-related disabilities, those VA reductions do not apply — the retiree gets both payments concurrently.
Practically, the changes operate through two places in Title 10. First, they adjust the CRSC-related language in 10 U.S.C. 1413a(b)(3) to require that the retiree’s retired pay not be treated as subject to the 38 U.S.C. reductions before calculating what the retiree should receive.
Second, the bill replaces the text of 10 U.S.C. 1414(b) with a special rule that explicitly grants concurrent receipt for chapter 61 disability retirees with combat-related conditions. Together those edits close gaps where chapter 61 retirees were previously excluded from concurrent-payment rules that other retirees enjoy.The Act is prospective: it takes effect on the first day of the first month after enactment and applies to payments for months beginning on or after that date.
It also removes leftover statutory language tied to an earlier phase-in of concurrent receipt, simplifying the chapter’s structure and reducing ambiguity about which classes of retirees are eligible going forward.Operationally, DoD and VA will need procedures to identify which chapter 61 retirees have combat-related disabilities under the statutory definition, implement payment-system changes so retired pay is not reduced for those months, and coordinate information exchanges to avoid double-counting or erroneous offsets. The bill does not create a new benefit category beyond the combat-related limitation, nor does it authorize retroactive payments before the effective date.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends 10 U.S.C. 1413a(b)(3) to require that a retiree’s retired pay 'is not subject to reduction under sections 5304 and 5305 of title 38' before determining concurrent payments when the disability is combat-related.
It replaces 10 U.S.C. 1414(b) with a special rule that entitles chapter 61 disability retirees to receive both retired pay and VA disability compensation for combat-related disabilities without applying 38 U.S.C. offsets.
The Act removes statutory provisions tied to a prior concurrent-receipt phase-in, redrafts subsection headings and renumbers parts of 10 U.S.C. 1414 to reflect the new permanent rule.
The law ties eligibility to the existing statutory definition of 'combat-related disability' in 10 U.S.C. 1413a(e), rather than creating a new definition or standard.
Effective date: the amendments take effect on the first day of the first month after enactment and apply only to payments for months beginning on or after that date (no retroactivity to earlier months).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title: 'Major Richard Star Act'
This section supplies the Act’s short name for citation. That matters for drafting implementing guidance and interagency memoranda where the statute will be referenced in policy or administrative instructions.
Amend 10 U.S.C. 1413a(b)(3) to preserve retired pay from 38 U.S.C. reductions
The bill inserts two clauses into subsection (b)(3) that make the retiree’s retired pay explicitly 'not subject to reduction under sections 5304 and 5305 of title 38' when calculating concurrent payments tied to CRSC eligibility. Practically, this rewrites the order of operations used to compute what a retiree receives: DoD cannot first reduce retired pay because of VA compensation when the disability is combat-related, which preserves the full retired pay base for offset calculations or concurrent-payment comparisons.
Rewrite 10 U.S.C. 1414(b) to create a special concurrent-receipt rule for Chapter 61 retirees
This provision replaces the prior text of 1414(b) with an explicit rule: a member or former member entitled to retired pay under chapter 61 who is also entitled to VA compensation for a combat-related disability shall be paid both concurrently without regard to 38 U.S.C. 5304–5305. The new language narrows concurrent receipt to the combat-related subset of chapter 61 retirees but removes the prior uncertainty that left some disabled retirees excluded from concurrent-payment protections.
Technical and conforming edits; remove phase-in language and renumber subsections
The bill strips language tied to an earlier phased expansion of concurrent receipt and redesignates subsections within 10 U.S.C. 1414 to reflect the permanent rule. It also updates cross-references (for example, changing a reference from 'Subsection (d)' to 'Subsection (c)'). These are housekeeping changes but they affect statutory interpretation and will require updating legal guidance and internal references used by benefits offices.
Effective date and applicability
The Act becomes effective on the first day of the month following enactment and applies to payments for months starting on or after that date. The provision is forward-looking only; it does not direct retroactive payments to months prior to the effective date and therefore limits immediate fiscal exposure to future payment streams rather than past arrears.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Chapter 61 disability retirees with combat-related disabilities — they receive both full military retired pay and VA disability compensation for qualifying months, increasing monthly income and simplifying their benefit picture.
- Surviving dependents and households of qualifying retirees — higher recurring household receipts can improve financial stability and affect survivor benefit calculations tied to base retired pay.
- Veterans Service Organizations and benefits attorneys — clearer statutory entitlement will reduce litigation over offsets and create demand for advising veterans about eligibility and re-certification.
- State and local social service agencies — some veterans may see reduced need for means-tested assistance as federal payments to qualifying retirees increase, shifting caseload dynamics.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Defense and Treasury — concurrent payments increase federal outlays for retired pay and create administrative costs to change payroll and accounting systems.
- Department of Veterans Affairs and benefit-adjudication offices — VA and DoD must coordinate to identify combat-related determinations and update information exchanges, raising workload and potential staffing needs.
- Congressional budget offices and appropriations committees — the change creates a recurring entitlement stream that will affect budget baselines and future appropriations decisions.
- Benefits administrators and payroll contractors — they must implement programming changes, audit processes, and corrective payment mechanisms to ensure accurate concurrent payments.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between restoring full, predictable income to veterans injured in combat—which advances equity and reduces legal ambiguity—and the fiscal and administrative costs of converting an offset into an ongoing entitlement for a defined group; policymakers must balance the moral and legal impulse to compensate combat-disabled retirees fully against the practical limits of federal budgets and the operational burden of implementing the change without creating errors or inconsistent treatment.
The Act resolves a long-standing inequity for a targeted set of disability retirees, but it also raises operational and fiscal puzzles. First, the law keeps eligibility tied to the existing statutory definition of 'combat-related disability' rather than expanding coverage; that preserves a bright-line rule but leaves unresolved borderline cases where classification disputes could trigger appeals and delay payments.
Second, while the bill eliminates 38 U.S.C. offsets for qualifying months, it does not create uniform guidance on how DoD and VA will certify combat-related status for payment purposes — the absence of an implementation protocol risks inconsistent application across services and may generate back-and-forth corrections.
From a budgetary perspective, the Act increases recurring federal outlays but avoids retroactive liabilities by applying only to months after the effective date. That limits immediate cost exposure while creating higher baseline obligations going forward.
The statute's technical edits simplify the chapter 71 text, but they also require careful coordination to ensure that cross-references and legacy regulations are updated so that no administrative gap or double payment occurs during the transition.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.