The Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act amends 38 U.S.C. 2306(b)(2) by removing the clause “who dies on or after November 11, 1998,” from subparagraphs (B) and (C). In short, it eliminates a date-based eligibility cutoff that currently limits VA-furnished memorial headstones and markers to certain decedents who died on or after that date.
This change effectively makes the categories defined in subparagraphs (B) and (C) apply regardless of the date of death, creating retroactive eligibility for individuals covered by those provisions who died before November 11, 1998. The primary operational consequences fall to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA): additional claims, documentation reviews for older deaths, and the fiscal cost of furnishing markers for newly eligible decedents.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill strikes the phrase limiting eligibility to persons who “die on or after November 11, 1998” from two subparagraphs of 38 U.S.C. 2306(b)(2), removing a temporal eligibility restriction for those categories. By excising the date language, the statutory categories in subparagraphs (B) and (C) will apply to decedents regardless of when they died.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include families and next-of-kin of decedents who meet the descriptive criteria in subparagraphs (B) and (C) but died before November 11, 1998, and the VA offices that process memorial headstone and marker requests. Veterans service organizations and funeral directors that assist families with VA benefits will also see more requests to support.
Why It Matters
This is a narrow textual change with outsized administrative and fiscal implications because it creates retroactive entitlement for a large historical cohort. For compliance officers and VA partners, the bill triggers new record-search and verification burdens and potentially a notable one-time demand for furnished markers.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill makes a single, surgical amendment to the United States Code: it removes a date limitation that currently restricts two specific categories of people in 38 U.S.C. 2306(b)(2) to those who died on or after November 11, 1998. The statutory language being removed appears in subparagraphs (B) and (C) only; the rest of section 2306 remains unchanged.
Because the deletion has the effect of erasing the temporal boundary, anyone who otherwise fits the categories described in those subparagraphs — but who died before the former cutoff — becomes eligible to receive a memorial headstone or marker furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Practically, the VA will need to accept and adjudicate claims tied to deaths that occurred years or decades earlier. That will require searching legacy records, determining whether existing documentation satisfies statutory eligibility criteria, and, where needed, working with families or service organizations to assemble proof.
The bill does not create new substantive categories of beneficiaries; it merely extends the existing categories back in time by removing the date restriction.The text contains no separate provisions on effective date, transition rules, or documentation standards for older deaths. Absent any special rule in the bill, implementation will rely on VA procedures and interpretations about how to process retroactive claims and whether replacements, new markers, or retroactive awards require different administrative handling.
The lack of legislative direction on these operational details places responsibility on the VA for designing practical procedures to handle an anticipated uptick in applications.Finally, although the amendment is narrow, the ripple effects are procedural and financial: more marker orders, verification work for older records, and potential increases in workloads for regional offices and contractor vendors who supply and install markers. The bill does not allocate funding, change penalty or fraud provisions, or alter eligibility evidence standards in the statute; those practical choices fall to the VA during implementation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends only one statutory subsection: it removes the phrase “who dies on or after November 11, 1998,” from subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 38 U.S.C. 2306(b)(2).
Because the amendment deletes the date limitation, individuals described in subparagraphs (B) and (C) who died before November 11, 1998 would become eligible for VA-furnished memorial headstones and markers.
The bill contains no funding provision, no special effective-date language, and does not change evidentiary requirements—those implementation details remain with the VA.
VA regional offices and benefits processors will likely face an immediate administrative increase: claims for older decedents require searching legacy personnel and service records and coordinating with families to establish eligibility.
The change creates potential fiscal exposure for the VA (costs of new markers and associated installation) but does not specify whether awards are limited to replacements, one-time issuance, or subject to any retroactive application deadlines.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section names the statute the “Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act.” It is a conventional short-title clause with no substantive legal effect; it simply provides the bill’s public name for reference in statutes and communications.
Amendment to 38 U.S.C. 2306(b)(2)
This is the operative change: the bill instructs an amendment to section 2306(b)(2) by striking the date phrase from subparagraphs (B) and (C). Mechanically, that excision removes the temporal restriction that currently confines those two subparagraphs to decedents who died on or after November 11, 1998. The statutory categories described in (B) and (C) will thus apply prospectively and retroactively to decedents without regard to date of death.
No express transition rules or funding
The bill does not include language about when the amendment takes effect, how to process pre-1998 claims, or any appropriations to cover additional costs. Because the statute is amended directly and no alternative effective date is stated, standard practice would make the change operative on enactment; however, the bill leaves operational questions—documentation standards, scope of retroactivity (e.g., replacements versus new awards), and internal VA procedures—to the Secretary and existing regulations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Families and next-of-kin of decedents who meet the descriptive criteria in subparagraphs (B) and (C) but died before November 11, 1998 — they gain eligibility to request a VA-furnished headstone or marker that was previously unavailable due to the date cutoff.
- Veterans service organizations and advocates — these groups can assist a broader set of claimants in obtaining memorial markers, increasing their ability to resolve long-standing unmet requests.
- Communities and cemeteries that host veteran burials — gravesites of newly eligible decedents may receive standardized VA markers, which can improve uniformity and recognition at public and private cemeteries.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Veterans Affairs — VA will shoulder additional administrative costs (claims processing, record searches) and procurement/installation costs for markers unless Congress provides separate funding.
- Federal budget/taxpayers — furnishing additional markers and administrative support increases federal outlays tied to veterans’ memorialization without an appropriation in the bill.
- VA regional offices and records units — these offices will face higher workloads to verify eligibility for older deaths, potentially diverting staff time from other claims unless VA reallocates resources or hires contractors.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is straightforward: the bill advances the social and moral aim of extending memorial recognition to decedents excluded by an arbitrary date, but it forces a trade-off between honoring more individuals and imposing substantial verification, administrative, and fiscal burdens on the VA and federal budget without providing implementation guidance or funding.
The bill is minimalist: a single textual deletion with broad downstream effects. That economy of language leaves several practical problems unresolved.
First, verification for pre-1998 deaths may be difficult. Military service records, award records, or dependency documents from decades ago can be incomplete or scattered across archives, making it harder for claimants and the VA to assemble proof that meets statutory criteria.
Second, the statute does not specify whether awards made after enactment are treated as replacements, new first-time awards, or subject to any retroactive filing deadlines; those choices affect both cost and fairness. Third, absent appropriations language, the VA must absorb additional costs within existing budgets or seek future funding, creating potential resource competition within the agency.
Implementation also raises potential legal and administrative questions. If a family already paid privately for a marker because the decedent was ineligible under the old cutoff, does the statute entitle them to a VA-supplied replacement or to reimbursement?
The bill is silent. That silence invites agency rulemaking and possibly litigation over retroactivity and remedies.
Finally, the amendment does not explain why November 11, 1998 was the prior cutoff or whether other related statutory provisions need harmonization; treating this change in isolation risks inconsistent outcomes across burial and memorial statutes that reference different eligibility dates or categories.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.