The Global Hunt for Offshore Smuggling and Trafficking Act of 2025 (GHOST Act) establishes a Russia Sanctions Enforcement Fund in the Treasury to pay expenses tied to seizures and forfeitures under U.S. sanctions on the Russian Federation and its covered merchant ships. It designates an Administrator within DHS (in consultation with the Treasury) to manage the Fund and authorizes a broad set of expenditures to support investigations, detention, contract services, informants, and interagency reimbursements.
The Act also creates the Export Enforcement Coordination Center within Homeland Security Investigations to coordinate cross-agency export control enforcement. It ties funding to a repayment schedule to the general fund and sets up inflation-adjusted end-of-year balance rules, annual reporting, and mechanisms to terminate the Fund if not used.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates the Russia Sanctions Enforcement Fund in the Treasury to finance seizures and forfeitures related to sanctions on Russia and its ships, sets an Administrator, and enumerates eligible expenditures. It also establishes the Export Enforcement Coordination Center to unify export control enforcement across multiple agencies.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies (DHS, DOJ, Treasury) that conduct sanctions enforcement and seizures, state and local law enforcement through reimbursements and grants, private contractors providing services for seizures, and entities involved in oil and petroleum product transactions that may be targeted for enforcement.
Why It Matters
It institutionalizes a dedicated funding stream for sanctions enforcement, enabling more rapid and coordinated responses to violations, while creating an interagency center to harmonize export controls and enforcement activities across the government.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates the Russia Sanctions Enforcement Fund (the Fund) within the Treasury. The Fund is established within 15 days after enactment and is intended to pay expenses related to seizures and forfeitures connected to United States sanctions on the Russian Federation and covered merchant ships.
An Administrator, appointed by the Secretary of Homeland Security in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, will manage the Fund and determine which expenditures are appropriate without requiring new appropriations for each item. Eligible costs include investigative costs by DHS or DOJ, detention and disposal costs for seized property, contract services, reimbursement to other agencies, payments to informants, equitable sharing with other agencies and foreign governments, and equipment or overtime costs for law enforcement involved in joint operations.
The Fund can also cover awards for information, purchases of evidence, and equipment for vessels or personnel involved in enforcement operations, and it allows reimbursement of private entities cooperating in investigations.
The Act prioritizes activities that result in the seizure or forfeiture of oil, petroleum products, or other commodities that fund illicit activity, and it requires the Fund to be managed as a trust fund under the Internal Revenue Code. Initial funding of $150 million is authorized for fiscal year 2026, with a plan to repay that amount to the general fund of the Treasury by September 30, 2036, adjusted for inflation thereafter.
Any excess end-of-year balance must be transferred to the general fund to help pay the national debt. The Act also authorizes inflation adjustments to the annual balance and sets strict limits preventing any unapproved transfers from the Fund.
A reporting requirement, beginning in 2026 and annually through 2036, compiles details on activities, seizures, financial health, and program outcomes, with a mechanism to terminate the Fund if it remains unused.In addition, the bill establishes the Export Enforcement Coordination Center within Homeland Security Investigations. The Center will coordinate among agencies such as State, Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy, and Intelligence, serving as a conduit for information exchange on export control violations, coordinating licensing and enforcement efforts, and supporting investigations with shared statistics and deconfliction support.
The Center will have a Director and two Deputy Directors from the Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice, and it will host liaisons from multiple agencies (including DHS components, the FBI, DOS, DOE, and others) to ensure near-real-time information sharing and coordinated enforcement across the federal government.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act creates the Russia Sanctions Enforcement Fund in the Treasury to pay for seizures, forfeitures, and related enforcement activities.
An Administrator, appointed by DHS with Treasury input, may authorize Fund expenditures without further appropriation for a broad set of enforcement costs.
Initial funding of $150 million is authorized for FY2026, with repayment to the general fund by 2036 and inflation-adjusted future balance caps.
The Fund prioritizes seizures involving oil and petroleum or other commodities that fund Russian efforts, aiming to maximize enforcement impact.
The Export Enforcement Coordination Center is established within Homeland Security Investigations to coordinate interagency export control enforcement and information sharing.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This Act may be cited as the Global Hunt for Offshore Smuggling and Trafficking Act of 2025 (the GHOST Act of 2025). It establishes the framing for the new Fund and Center and signals the bill’s emphasis on offshore enforcement related to Russia sanctions.
Russia Sanctions Enforcement Fund
Section 2 creates the Russia Sanctions Enforcement Fund in the Treasury and designates an Administrator to manage expenditures related to sanctioned seizures and forfeitures. It enumerates eligible costs—investigative work, detention and disposal of seized property, contract services, reimbursements to agencies, informant rewards, equitable sharing, and equipment and overtime for personnel involved in joint operations. The section also authorizes additional uses for information and equipment, and prioritizes activities connected to oil and petroleum products that fund sanction efforts.
Export Enforcement Coordination Center
Section 3 establishes the Export Enforcement Coordination Center within Homeland Security Investigations to serve as the primary cross-agency hub for export enforcement. It coordinates with State, Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy, DHS, and intelligence entities; facilitates licensing interfaces; deconflicts and supports investigations; and builds government-wide tracking and targeting capabilities.
Administration and Liaisons
Section 4 designates the Executive Associate Director of Homeland Security Investigations as the Center’s Administrator. It creates two Deputy Directors from Commerce and Justice and requires liaisons from a broad set of agencies (e.g., FBI, DOI, OST, DOE, and others) to ensure broad representation and collaboration in enforcement activities.
Funding and End-of-Year Balances
Section 5 details the funding mechanics, including the initial $150 million appropriation for FY2026, repayment to the general fund by 2036, and inflation-adjusted balance caps. It also prescribes how end-of-year balances beyond the cap are transferred to the general fund to help pay the national debt and sets inflation mechanisms to adjust amounts going forward.
Reporting, Termination, and Definitions
Section 6 requires annual reporting on Fund activities, seizures, and financial health, and provides a termination trigger if the Fund is unused. It also includes a waiver mechanism for national security reasons and a general construction clause that aligns with related anti-terrorism funding authorities. The definitions section clarifies terms like 'covered Federal agency' and 'covered merchant ship' to ensure precise scope.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security and its investigators (including DHS and HSI) gain a dedicated funding stream and centralized coordination that can improve enforcement capacity.
- Department of Justice and other federal agencies receive reimbursements and access to specialized resources, enabling broader and more efficient investigations.
- State and local law enforcement benefits from equitable sharing payments and access to equipment and support for joint operations.
- Informants and private entities providing information or specialized services can be rewarded and reimbursed under the Fund.
- The Export Enforcement Coordination Center improves cross‑agency coordination for export controls, benefiting the national security and regulatory compliance ecosystem.
Who Bears the Cost
- The U.S. Treasury general fund via transfer mechanics if end-of-year balances exceed caps or through repayment of initial funding; there are opportunity costs compared to other programs.
- Federal agencies that must administer and operate Fund-supported activities, including personnel and compliance infrastructure.
- Private sector contractors providing services or equipment funded by the Fund, and contractors involved in seized asset management.
- State and local entities that participate in joint operations but rely on federal reimbursement and funding cycles.
- Taxpayers or broader public borrowers if debt service implications arise from Fund dynamics or if fund termination occurs due to unused funds.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to tie sanctions enforcement funding directly to a debt-reduction mechanism, potentially subordinating enforcement priorities to budgetary goals, while ensuring rigorous oversight and transparency to prevent misallocation or scope creep.
The GHOST Act constructs a substantial enforcement mechanism with a dedicated fund and cross‑agency Center, which enhances investigative capacity but introduces budgetary and governance questions. It relies on annual reporting and inflation-adjusted funding to prevent mission creep while accelerating sanctions enforcement.
The reliance on end-of-year transfers to the general fund to support the national debt raises questions about how enforcement outcomes, budget stability, and debt management interact, and whether enforcement priorities (notably oil and petroleum products) may skew asset seizures. The act also embeds a waiver mechanism for national security reasons, but the criteria and process for such waivers are not fully specified, leaving potential opacity around when and how the Fund can be exempt from termination or standard reporting requirements.
Finally, while the Center is designed to enhance interagency collaboration, the breadth of participating agencies and the breadth of authorities granted could complicate accountability and oversight if not tightly governed.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.