The Budget Reform Act of 2025 restructures how Congress and the administration prepare, review, and enforce the federal budget. It requires the Congressional Budget Office to publish the models, code, and replicable data behind its cost estimates (with narrow nondisclosure workarounds), compels agencies to produce activity‑level, zero‑based budget packages, and converts much of the budget calendar from an annual to a biennial cycle starting with the 2028 biennium.
Beyond timing, the bill changes substance and enforcement: it mandates two‑year appropriations and multi‑year authorizations, narrows what counts as the baseline, restricts official travel when the President’s budget is late, and raises the Senate threshold to waive several budget points of order to two‑thirds. For budget offices, program managers, Appropriations and Budget committees, and procedural offices in both Houses, the bill replaces long‑standing habits with new documentation, deadlines, and politicized enforcement tools.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires CBO to publish models, programs, assumptions and (to the extent allowed) data to permit third‑party replication; it requires agencies to prepare zero‑based, activity‑level budget submissions and shifts budget drafting and appropriations to a biennial timetable. It also institutes travel restrictions tied to late presidential budget submissions and raises the Senate waiver threshold on many budget points of order to two‑thirds.
Who It Affects
Directly affected actors include the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget, federal departments and agencies that must prepare activity‑level budgets, House and Senate Budget and Appropriations Committees, Senate floor managers (procedural operations), the President and senior political appointees, and congressional leadership responsible for scheduling.
Why It Matters
If enacted, the bill alters the mechanics of federal budgeting: more data and models will be public and replicable; agencies must justify every activity as if new; Congress will budget on a two‑year cadence that changes the timing and content of resolutions and appropriation acts; and procedural barriers (higher waiver votes, a surgical point of order) will make it harder to bypass budget committee scrutiny.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Title I forces the Congressional Budget Office to publish the models, data‑preparation routines, updates, and the computational details used to produce estimates, and to supply descriptive statistics or contact points where law prevents full disclosure. The aim is replication: the text requires CBO to make available enough code and metadata so outsiders could reproduce estimates.
CBO gets a six‑month window after enactment to comply; the bill preserves nondisclosure where law requires it but asks for variable lists and summaries instead of silence.
Title II builds a zero‑based discipline into the President’s budget submission. Departments and agencies must list every activity, cite the legal authority, analyze objectives, operations and costs, offer three funding alternatives (with at least two below current levels), summarize priorities at each level, and provide one or more measures of cost‑efficiency or effectiveness.
OMB must issue implementation guidelines directing that baselines be treated as zero—so each line is justified anew. Congress exempted Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from the activity‑level submission requirement.Title III and associated amendments recast the timetable and structure for congressional budget action.
The bill amends the Congressional Budget Act and Title 31 to require the President to transmit a biennial budget at the start of the first session in an odd‑numbered year, set new committee and floor deadlines (for example, earlier House committee completion dates and March/April targets for concurrent resolutions), require appropriation acts to be written for two fiscal years, and create a point of order against authorizations shorter than two years unless the program will be finished. It also requires agencies to prepare multi‑year plans and align agency managerial and performance planning with the biennial cycle.Subtitle B of Title III adds compliance pressure: if the President’s budget is late, the bill prohibits federal funding for official travel by senior political appointees and for Presidential travel during the “covered period,” with narrow exceptions for returning to the seat of government, National Capital Region travel, or national‑security continuity events.
It also prevents the President from addressing a joint session of Congress until the National Security Strategy and the President’s budget are submitted. A separate “no budget, no travel” provision suspends federal travel funding for Members of a House that misses statutory budget milestones.Title IV changes Senate procedure: the bill raises the threshold to waive or sustain appeals of many budget points of order to two‑thirds of Senators, and creates a surgical strike point of order that allows the Chair (and ultimately a sustained point of order) to excise material that falls within the Budget Committee’s jurisdiction unless the material originates in a budget resolution or a Committee‑reported measure.
Title V revises baseline rules—defining baseline projections on a biennial basis, excluding emergency and supplemental resources from the baseline, and removing inflation adjustments used previously for baseline escalators.Most substantive provisions take effect January 1, 2027 and apply beginning with the 2028 biennium; CBO transparency takes effect six months after enactment. The bill rearranges the statutory scaffolding of budgeting, but it leaves to OMB, CBO, agencies, and congressional committees the detailed implementation choices that will determine how disruptive the changes are in practice.
The Five Things You Need to Know
CBO must publish models, code, assumptions and the replicable computational details for each cost estimate and updates; where law forbids disclosure, CBO must provide variable lists, descriptive statistics, statutory citations and contact points.
Agencies must submit activity‑level, zero‑based budget packages with the legal authority, operational review, three funding alternatives (at least two below current levels), priority summaries, and efficiency/effectiveness measures; OMB will issue the implementing guidelines and treat baselines as zero.
The federal budget moves to a biennial cycle: the President submits a biennial budget at the start of the first session in odd‑numbered years; appropriation acts must be written for two fiscal years and delineate amounts for each year.
If the President’s budget is late, federal funds may not be used for official travel by senior political employees or for Presidential travel during the covered period, subject to limited exceptions (return trips, NCR travel, national security continuity events).
The Senate must secure a two‑thirds vote to waive or sustain appeals of many budget points of order, and the bill creates a surgical point of order that strips out Budget Committee‑jurisdiction material not reported by that committee.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
CBO publication requirement ('CBO show your work')
This section amends section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act to require the Director of CBO to post fiscal and policy models, data preparation routines, updates, and the computational details used for each estimate on CBO’s website and to make them available to Members of Congress. Where statutory confidentiality prevents full disclosure, CBO must publish variable lists, descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, counts, correlations where non‑disclosing), the statutory citation for the nondisclosure, and a contact who has access. Practically, CBO will need to decide the format for publishable code and create sanitized datasets or synthetic alternatives while maintaining legal protections for tax or administrative records.
Zero‑based budgeting and OMB guidelines
This provision inserts a new subsection in 31 U.S.C. 1105 requiring that each agency budget package identify every activity for which it seeks funds, the legal basis, an operations and objectives review, and three alternative funding levels per activity (with at least two below current spending). Agencies must indicate what priorities each level accomplishes and the incremental value of higher funding, plus efficiency/effectiveness metrics. OMB must publish guidelines and effectively instruct agencies to assume a zero baseline. The statute exempts Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from the activity‑level disclosure requirement, limiting the administrative burden on entitlement program offices but creating a two‑tiered treatment across the budget.
Biennial timetable, appropriation style, and authorizations
This block rewrites the timetable in the Congressional Budget Act and Title 31 to accommodate a biennial schedule. It moves key dates (President’s submission at start of first session in odd years or the first Monday in February in special cases), sets deadlines for committee views, requires the concurrent budget resolution to be adopted for a biennium, and requires that appropriation Acts be prepared for two fiscal years and specify amounts by year. It also creates a point of order against authorizations and appropriations of less than two years unless the program will terminate. The changes force committees to rewrite rules, plan hearings and markups on a two‑year horizon, and adjust scoring and program timelines.
Compliance tools: travel limits, joint‑session preconditions, and 'no budget, no travel'
The bill links compliance to tangible penalties: if the President’s budget for the next biennium is late, federal funds may not be used for official travel by 'political employees' (specified senior appointees) or for Presidential travel during the covered period, though limited exceptions allow return trips to the seat of Government, National Capital Region movements, and travel triggered by national security continuity protocols. It also conditions a presidential address to a joint session on prior receipt of the National Security Strategy and the budget, and bars federal travel funding for Members of a House that misses statutory budget milestones. These enforcement devices are unusual: they make procedural deadlines self‑enforcing via operational pain rather than budgetary offsets.
Senate thresholds and a surgical budget point of order
The bill amends the statutory framework and accompanying budget rules to require two‑thirds of Senators to waive or sustain appeals of many specified budget points of order (replacing a three‑fifths standard in several places). It also adds a 'surgical strike' point of order that allows the Chair to strike provisions in measures that fall within the Budget Committee’s jurisdiction unless those provisions originate from the Committee’s reported material. The combination raises the procedural bar to bypass Budget Committee review and centralizes scope enforcement on the Senate floor, changing floor strategy and managerial leverage.
Baseline definition and technical changes
This section revises baseline law under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act. The baseline becomes a biennial projection based on current law and continuation of current discretionary levels, excludes emergency and supplemental resources, and removes prior adjustments for inflation and other escalators. The change alters how future savings and costs are measured and how committees score changes relative to the baseline, which can materially affect budgetary narratives about savings or growth.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Congressional staff and lawmakers who demand transparency — they get access to CBO models and replicable computational detail, reducing asymmetric information when evaluating score disputes.
- Budget and appropriations committees — the biennial schedule and two‑year appropriations give them a longer runway for program reviews and potential efficiency gains in oversight and markups.
- Outside researchers, think tanks, and media — published CBO code and sanitized data increase the capacity for independent replication, forensic scoring, and comparative analysis.
- Program evaluators and agency program managers — zero‑based submissions create a structured template for articulating objectives, metrics, and tradeoffs, which can support program improvement and reallocation decisions.
- Advocates for fiscal discipline — a two‑thirds waiver threshold and travel penalties provide enforcement mechanisms that make it harder to duck committee processes or perpetually delay budget submissions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies and program offices — they must produce activity‑level, zero‑based packages with multiple funding scenarios and performance metrics, creating a significant one‑time and recurring compliance burden on program, budget, and legal staff.
- Congressional Budget Office — CBO must invest staff time, technical infrastructure, and legal screening to publish models and sanitized datasets while meeting confidentiality obligations.
- Office of Management and Budget — OMB must draft implementing guidance, provide training, and manage the transition to zero‑based practices and biennial timeline coordination across agencies.
- Presidential and senior political staff and travel offices — travel restrictions tied to late budgets impose operational limitations and political costs, including on security planning and diplomatic scheduling.
- Senate floor managers and majority leadership — a higher waiver threshold and the surgical point of order make floor maneuvering more difficult and increase the risk that otherwise negotiated provisions will be removed during briefings or conference work.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between transparency, discipline, and committee control on one hand, and administrative cost, flexibility, and responsiveness on the other: the bill forces models and budgets into the open and creates structural brakes on bypassing committee review, but it also imposes heavy information burdens on agencies and CBO and reduces the nimbleness of the budget process at times when flexibility may be essential (emergencies, rapid economic shifts, or diplomatic needs).
The bill packs ambitious procedural and disclosure changes but leaves crucial implementation choices unresolved. CBO must reconcile replication goals with legal restrictions on taxpayer, administrative, or proprietary data; the statute’s requirement to publish 'programs, models, assumptions and other details…sufficient to permit replication' will force CBO to develop standard sanitization practices, document retention rules, and possibly synthetic dataset techniques—choices that will shape how useful the published materials are in practice.
The six‑month compliance window helps but does not solve resource and privacy trade‑offs.
Zero‑based budgeting promises priority clarity but is administratively costly and susceptible to formalism: agencies will produce large volumes of activity narratives and alternative budgets that could become checkbox exercises unless OMB enforces standard metrics and comparability. Congress gains structured decision material but loses flexibility to reallocate quickly in an emergency if the biennial locks in sums or if the two‑year appropriations and authorization point of order discourage short‑term fixes.
Travel restrictions and 'no budget, no travel' penalties create enforcement teeth but risk politicizing operational functions: they can be effective carrots and sticks, but they also can interrupt continuity of government or diplomatic obligations unless carefully administered.
On Senate procedure, raising the waiver threshold and authorizing a surgical point of order trades off flexibility for committee prerogative. Two‑thirds support makes it harder to waive points of order but raises the bar for compromise; the surgical strike empowers the Chair and Budget Committee’s jurisdictional claims but could produce more frequent, granular floor rulings, complicating conference interactions.
Finally, changing baseline conventions (no inflation adjustment, exclusion of emergencies) will alter scoring narratives and could make long‑term trends appear larger or smaller depending on accounting choices—an effect that will play out politically and technically in every subsequent budget cycle.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.