SB2308 amends the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to collect an entrance fee surcharge from international visitors to units of the National Park System. The bill defines an "international visitor" and sets out how the surcharge is determined and collected—either by standard entrance-fee processes or via third-party travel vendors—and directs that proceeds stay with the unit for maintenance, visitor services, and staffing.
It also adds a parallel surcharge on National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Passes sold to international visitors, with proceeds deposited into the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes an entrance fee surcharge on international visitors to National Park units, with the amount set by each unit’s superintendent under regulation, and collected by the Secretary or a contracted third party. Proceeds stay at the collecting unit for maintenance and services.
Who It Affects
National Park units and their staff, international visitors admitted to the United States, and third-party travel vendors that may collect the surcharge under contract.
Why It Matters
Creates a dedicated revenue stream to fund maintenance, staffing, and visitor services at National Park units, while preserving access by allowing control over pricing and collection methods.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The PATRIOT Parks Act codifies a new source of revenue for the National Park System by charging international visitors a surcharge on entrance fees. It defines who counts as an international visitor and explains how the surcharge can be set and collected.
At the unit level, superintendents will determine the surcharge amount within regulatory parameters, with the Secretary ensuring the mechanism is implemented consistently. If entrance fees are charged per vehicle, the bill requires a process to levy the surcharge proportionately.
Collection can happen through the standard fee-collection framework or via third-party travel vendors under contract. Importantly, the surcharge is separate from existing visa fees and is not administered by the State Department or DHS.
Proceeds from the surcharge stay with the unit where collected and will be used for maintenance, visitor services, staffing, and related needs. Additionally, the Act adds a surcharge on National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Passes sold to international visitors, with those funds deposited into the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund.
The overall design aims to bolster park upkeep without broadly disrupting access to park experiences.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill authorizes a new entrance fee surcharge for international visitors to National Park System units.
An international visitor is defined by two INA provisions, ensuring consistent eligibility.
Unit superintendents set surcharge amounts by regulation to maximize revenue while preserving visitation.
Surcharge collection may use standard methods or third-party travel vendors under contract.
All surcharge proceeds stay with the collecting unit; pass surcharges fund the Legacy Restoration Fund.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Surcharge for international visitors to National Park System units
Section 2 adds a new paragraph to the existing FLREA framework, creating an entrance fee surcharge for international visitors. It defines international visitors through INA references and lays out how the surcharge is established, collected, and adjusted. The superintendent determines the amount within regulatory parameters, with collection by the Secretary or an authorized third party. The section also provides for per-vehicle pricing mechanics and permits suspension, modification, and minimum increase rules, while ensuring visa fees remain separate from this surcharge.
Surcharge on recreation passes for international visitors
Section 805(a)(11) adds a new surcharge on National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Passes when sold to international visitors. The authority to set the surcharge and determine timing is delegated to the Secretary, with proceeds deposited into the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund, thereby linking pass-related revenue to legacy restoration efforts across federal lands.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- National Park Service units and their staffs, who gain dedicated funds for maintenance, visitor services, and staffing.
- Unit-level park managers and rangers who can apply revenue to specific needs at their sites.
- Third-party travel vendors contracted to collect surcharges, creating a regulated revenue stream and potential service opportunities.
- Local communities and economies near high-traffic parks that benefit from improved facilities and visitor services supported by the funds.
- National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund management, which receives pass-surcharge proceeds to support restoration projects.
Who Bears the Cost
- International visitors pay the new surcharge, increasing upfront costs of visiting parks.
- Park units and staff incur administrative costs to implement and oversee the surcharge collection.
- Third-party travel vendors bear onboarding and compliance costs from contract administration.
- Some international travelers may alter travel plans due to higher fees, potentially affecting visitation levels.
- Local tourism-related businesses face revenue volatility if visitation shifts due to the surcharge.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Can a revenue-maximizing surcharge for international visitors fund maintenance and services without materially deterring visitation or creating unequal access across park units?
The bill creates a dedicated revenue stream, but it raises policy questions about the balance between funding needs and access costs, especially for international visitors. Implementation details—such as the process for per-vehicle surcharges, the regulatory standards governing surcharge levels, and the framework for third-party collection—will determine how smoothly the mechanism operates across diverse park units.
The tie to the Legacy Restoration Fund adds another layer of fiscal governance and outcomes tracking, which could influence how funds are prioritized across sites.
Core tensions include whether revenue-maximizing surcharge levels could dampen international visitation at certain units and whether tiered or time-based pricing would introduce inequities in access. In particular, the interaction between unit-level pricing decisions and national guidance on equity and conservation funding will be crucial to monitor as the program unfolds.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.