The Healing Partnerships for Survivors Act would amend the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act to authorize grants that strengthen relationships between health and wellness providers or systems (including behavioral health) and community-based sexual assault programs. Eligible entities include state, territorial, and tribal coalitions, nonprofit sexual assault programs, and tribal organizations.
The bill also expands the federal framework to define sexual assault consistently with the Violence Against Women Act and authorizes funding to carry out the new grant program from 2026 through 2030. The overarching aim is to build trauma-informed, culturally relevant partnerships that improve prevention, screening, linkage to care, treatment, and survivor advocacy across the lifespan, while preserving privacy and safety for survivors.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes a new FVPSA grant program (Sec. 315) to fund partnerships between health systems and community-based sexual assault programs, with defined eligible entities, authorized uses, reporting, and privacy safeguards.
Who It Affects
Eligible grantees include state/territorial/tribal coalitions and nonprofit sexual assault programs; survivors access the resulting integrated services through health systems and community programs.
Why It Matters
Creates a formal, funding-backed mechanism to coordinate medical, behavioral health, housing, and advocacy services for survivors; advances culturally specific and trauma-informed care, including for tribal and territorial populations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a new section to the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (Sec. 315) to authorize grants that help health and wellness providers or systems work with community-based sexual assault programs. Eligible entities include state, territorial, and tribal coalitions, nonprofit rape crisis centers, and tribal organizations with a history of serving sexual assault survivors.
The funds are drawn from existing FVPSA appropriations and are intended to build partnerships that deliver trauma-informed, culturally relevant services to survivors across the lifespan, including adults who experienced childhood sexual abuse. The program supports a range of activities—prevention, screening, linkages to care, treatment (including therapy and recovery supports), housing assistance, personal advocacy, and staff training—while requiring privacy protections for survivors.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Grants are authorized under Section 315 to build partnerships between health systems and community-based sexual assault programs.
Eligible entities include state/territorial/tribal coalitions, nonprofit sexual assault programs, and tribal organizations.
Funds may cover services, training, evaluations, and dissemination of best practices to improve survivor care.
Grants require reporting on activities, impact, and privacy protections for survivors.
Authorized funding for the program is $30 million annually from 2026 through 2030.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Grants for strengthening public health systems of support for survivors of sexual assault
Section 315 establishes a new grant program under the FVPSA to fund partnerships between health and wellness providers or systems (including behavioral health) and community-based sexual assault programs. Eligible entities include state, territorial, and tribal coalitions, nonprofit community-based programs with a history of serving survivors, and Indian tribes or tribal organizations. The grants are intended to develop, implement, and improve trauma-informed, culturally relevant services that address the health and well-being of survivors across the lifespan. The program allows a broad set of activities: prevention, screening, care linkages, treatment (including therapy), housing assistance, personal advocacy, and staff training, all within a framework that protects victim privacy and safety.
Administrative and reporting requirements within the grant program
Recipients must submit reports describing activities funded by the grant, along with evaluations of impact and effectiveness, and any other information the Secretary deems appropriate. A technical assistance mechanism is authorized to help grant recipients implement and evaluate programs, disseminate best practices, and ensure consistency across jurisdictions. Privacy and confidentiality requirements are embedded to protect survivors throughout program operations.
Authorization of appropriations for the FVPSA Section 315 program
The bill redesignates the annual funding stream to carry out Section 315, authorizing $30,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2030. This establishes a multi-year support horizon for building cross-system collaborations between health providers and sexual assault programs and signals the federal government’s commitment to sustained infrastructure for survivor services.
Authority of the Secretary—expansion to include sexual assault
Section 304 is amended to add sexual assault to the list of abuses the Secretary may address alongside dating violence. This formal expansion clarifies the Secretary’s authority to fund and oversee programs that integrate sexual assault-related services into public health and family violence prevention activities, reinforcing the cross-system approach described in Section 315.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Survivors of sexual assault across the lifespan who gain access to integrated and trauma-informed services (medical care, behavioral health, housing, advocacy)
- State, territorial, and tribal coalitions that coordinate regional responses and funnel federal funds to local programs
- Nonprofit community-based sexual assault programs (including rape crisis centers and culturally specific organizations) that receive grants to expand or enhance services
- Health and wellness providers and systems that partner with sexual assault programs to deliver coordinated care
- Disability programs that intersect with survivor services to improve accessibility and accommodations
- Tribal organizations and communities that receive targeted support for culturally appropriate services
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal administration and program oversight costs (not more than $5,000,000 per year for evaluation/monitoring)
- Eligible grantees that must implement new partnerships, reporting, privacy protections, and evaluation requirements
- State/territorial/tribal coalitions and nonprofit programs bearing the administrative and coordination burden of cross-system integration
- Health systems and service providers bearing integration costs (staff, training, data-sharing controls)
- Applicants and grantees may incur ongoing costs to ensure privacy and confidentiality of survivor data
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between building durable, cross-system capacity to respond to sexual assault (a long-term, resource-intensive goal) and meeting immediate survivor needs through direct services. Balancing broad, trauma-informed collaboration with tight funding and administrative demands will determine whether the act strengthens overall public health response or stretches resources too thin to impact short-term outcomes.
The program’s design relies on multi-jurisdictional coordination—across federal FVPSA, state/territorial/tribal coalitions, and nonprofit organizations—to align health, behavioral health, disability services, and community-based sexual assault programs. While this has the potential to deliver more comprehensive care, it also raises implementation challenges: differing state and tribal governance, variable capacity among eligible entities, and the risk that funding may favor larger coalitions over smaller, local programs.
Privacy and confidentiality requirements will demand robust data handling and staff training, potentially increasing administrative overhead. Finally, while $30 million per year represents a meaningful investment, it is finite relative to the scope of nationwide implementation and ongoing survivor needs; how funds are prioritized and measured will shape the program’s effectiveness.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.