The RISE from Trauma Act creates a cross‑sector federal effort to identify and treat childhood and family trauma by funding local coordinating bodies, expanding interagency pilots, underwriting hospital‑based interventions, and investing in workforce and school training. The bill layers new grant authorities across HHS and DOJ, reauthorizes and expands existing child‑trauma programs, and directs OMB to produce guidance for interagency Performance Partnership Pilots.
Why it matters: the measure packages sustained, large‑scale federal funding and administrative action to push trauma‑informed practice into hospitals, schools, law enforcement, and community organizations—with explicit priorities for communities with high overdose, violence, or child‑welfare involvement. For compliance officers, program directors, hospital leaders, and education administrators, the bill creates concrete new grant opportunities, reporting requirements, and program design expectations that will shape local service networks and workforce pipelines for the next decade.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes multi‑year grants to local coordinating bodies (up to $6 million per award for 4 years), funds hospital pilots to reduce readmissions after overdose or violent injury, reauthorizes and scales national trauma networks, and directs interagency Performance Partnership Pilots tailored to children who experienced trauma. It also invests in workforce development, teacher preparation, and a DOJ‑run law enforcement trauma coordinating center.
Who It Affects
State and local health and human service agencies, hospitals and health systems, school districts and teacher‑preparation programs, institutions of higher education, tribal governments, community‑based nonprofits, and law‑enforcement agencies. Federal agencies (HHS, OMB, DOJ, CDC, Education, HUD, Labor) must coordinate applications, waivers, and performance metrics.
Why It Matters
This is a financed, multi‑sector push to institutionalize trauma‑informed practice by changing how grants are awarded, how pilots are structured across agencies, and how workforce pipelines are funded—potentially altering service delivery, billing/reimbursement conversations, and school disciplinary practices in high‑need communities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a new HHS grant program for local coordinating bodies to prevent or mitigate trauma and promote resilience. Eligible applicants must assemble representatives from at least five stakeholder categories—public health, higher education, health care, education, criminal justice, workforce, community organizations, and people with lived experience—and use funds for needs assessment, data collection, strategic planning, training, service delivery, and sustainability planning.
Grants are limited in size and duration so awardees must build partnerships and plan post‑grant funding.
The legislation expands an interagency Performance Partnership Pilot authority so federal discretionary dollars can support up to 10 trauma‑focused pilots across programs serving infants, children, youth, and families. OMB is charged to issue guidance, template waivers, performance measures, and timing alignment to ease cross‑agency applications and start‑up funding.
The pilots are explicitly designed to target populations facing concentrated trauma, including those involved in child welfare, juvenile justice, or communities with high overdose or violence rates.Hospitals and health systems become explicit sites for intervention: HHS shall fund hospitals to test trauma‑informed, post‑overdose and post‑injury interventions that emphasize screening, discharge planning, long‑term case management, and partnerships with community providers, and require outcome reporting. CMS is asked to evaluate coverage and reimbursement options for sustained payment of those activities.
Parallel investments reauthorize and enlarge the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, CDC surveillance funding, trauma support in schools grants, and a new infant and early childhood clinical workforce training program to expand specialized mental‑health capacity.Education and workforce provisions amend the Higher Education Act and other statutes to push trauma‑informed, resilience‑focused training into teacher preparation and school leadership programs, prioritize recruitment from communities highly exposed to trauma, and add NHSC allocation for placements in schools and community sites. DOJ receives authorities to fund community grants addressing children exposed to violence and to establish a National Law Enforcement Child and Youth Trauma Coordinating Center to craft best practices, provide training, and award implementation grants to agencies.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Local coordinating bodies must include representatives from at least five of eight specified categories (public health, higher education, health care, criminal justice, education, workforce, community organizations, and the general public) and must collectively show expertise in childhood trauma and resilience.
HHS grants to coordinating bodies are capped at $6,000,000 per award for a 4‑year period and the program is authorized at $600,000,000 per fiscal year for 2026–2033.
The bill authorizes up to 10 interagency Performance Partnership Pilots (FY2026–2030) focused on trauma‑affected infants, children, and youth, with OMB required to issue start‑up funding authorities, template waivers, and aligned performance measures within 9 months of enactment.
Hospitals and health systems are eligible for grants to design and evaluate trauma‑informed, post‑overdose and post‑injury care models, must report quality measures developed under the grants, and HHS/CMS will assess existing coverage or reimbursement pathways for sustaining successful models.
DOJ will stand up a National Law Enforcement Child and Youth Trauma Coordinating Center with $2M/year (FY2026–2030) plus $6M/year for grants to agencies to train officers and develop community referral partnerships for trauma‑exposed children and youth.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Local coordinating bodies to prevent and mitigate community trauma
Creates a HHS grant program that funds ‘‘coordinating bodies’’—multi‑stakeholder entities that convene local partners to map needs, collect disaggregated data, design strategic plans, run trauma‑informed training, and implement local services. The statute specifies eligible partner categories, requires collective expertise in trauma, prioritizes high‑need communities using CDC‑derived overdose and violence metrics, limits awards to $6M for four years, and mandates evaluation and sustainability planning.
Up to 10 trauma‑focused interagency pilots and OMB guidance
Expands existing Performance Partnership authority to allow federal discretionary funds across agencies to be pooled for up to 10 pilots (FY2026–2030) focused on improving outcomes for children and families exposed to trauma. The Director of OMB must produce guidance within nine months covering startup funding authorities, template waivers, performance measurements, best practices, and application timing to support cross‑agency implementation.
Hospital‑based interventions after overdose, suicide, or violent injury
Authorizes grants to hospitals and health systems to design, test, and evaluate trauma‑informed interventions for patients presenting with overdose, suicide attempts, or violent injury. Granted activities include screening, discharge planning, counseling, long‑term case management, and partnerships with community organizations; grantees must submit data and quality measures, and HHS/CMS will explore reimbursement opportunities to support sustainability.
Reauthorizes and expands federal child‑trauma infrastructure
Reauthorizes the National Child Traumatic Stress Network with an explicit requirement that grantees collaborate to produce evidence‑based resources and allows grantees to deliver training and services. The bill also raises CDC surveillance funding and reauthorizes school trauma support programs to bolster national capacity and data collection on trauma and overdose/violence indicators.
New pipelines, NHSC funding for school/community placements, and teacher training
Creates an infant and early childhood clinical leadership grant program to build training institutes, authorizes $25M per year (FY2026–2030), adds NHSC funding ($50M/year) for placements in schools/community settings, and amends teacher‑prep partnership criteria to require trauma‑informed and resilience‑focused training tracks, including alternative education and classroom practices that reduce punitive discipline.
Federal toolkits for front‑line providers and educator leadership
Directs HHS to develop accessible toolkits within 18 months for teachers, home visitors, health providers, child‑welfare and juvenile justice staff, faith leaders, and others on identification, response, building safe learning environments, and preventing secondary trauma among providers. Higher‑education partnership grant criteria are adjusted to favor programs with concrete trauma‑informed training proposals.
Law enforcement training, best practices, and grants
Establishes a DOJ‑run Center to disseminate best practices for trauma‑informed policing with child and youth populations, provide training and TA, and award grants to state, local, and tribal law enforcement to implement referral partnerships and trauma‑informed response models. The Center is authorized $2M/year and grant funding $6M/year for FY2026–2030.
Community grants to prevent and heal trauma from violence and substance use
Creates grant authority through DOJ to support community collaborations that educate the public, train caregivers and professionals, and coordinate services to prevent and mitigate childhood trauma related to violence and substance use; gives priority to communities addressing poly‑victimization and is authorized at $11M/year (FY2026–2030).
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Children and families in high‑need communities: prioritized for coordinated screening, prevention, and trauma‑informed services through local coordinating bodies and pilot projects, with funding aimed at reducing readmissions, violence exposure, and foster/juvenile‑justice involvement.
- Community‑based organizations and behavioral‑health providers: gain new partnership roles, grant funding for service delivery and evaluation, and formal pathways to collaborate with hospitals, schools, and law enforcement, expanding referral streams and program capacity.
- Educational institutions and teachers: teacher‑prep programs and K‑12 schools get federal support to integrate trauma‑informed classroom practices, alternatives to punitive discipline, and leadership development to improve learning and retention for students affected by trauma.
- Hospitals and health systems: receive grant funding to establish post‑overdose/suicide/violence care pathways and to develop quality measures that can inform reimbursement and reduce readmissions.
- Mental‑health workforce and training institutions: new grant programs (infant and early childhood clinical leadership, NHSC allocations) create training slots, scholarships, and mid‑career upskilling to grow a specialized workforce that serves infants and young children.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies and program offices (HHS, OMB, DOJ, CDC, Education): must coordinate new grant programs, develop performance metrics and waivers, and manage increased administrative oversight and evaluations.
- Hospitals and health systems: while eligible for grants, they will face operational and reporting burdens to implement pilots and may need to invest internal resources before reimbursement pathways are clear.
- Local governments and school districts: required to form or participate in coordinating bodies and may need to reallocate staff time and local funding to match grant activities or sustain programs after the 4‑year awards end.
- Small community organizations and tribal entities: can benefit from funds but will bear administrative burdens of grant applications, compliance, data reporting, and building partnerships to meet eligibility thresholds.
- State and local law‑enforcement agencies: expected to invest time and training capacity to implement trauma‑informed practices and to build referral partnerships—tasks that may compete with other operational priorities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—rapidly scaling trauma‑informed services with federal money and standards, and preserving local ownership, cultural responsiveness, and long‑term sustainability—yet the mechanisms that make grants scalable (standard metrics, eligibility thresholds, ties to evidence‑based practices) also risk privileging measurable short‑term outcomes over community‑defined healing and undercutting trust when law enforcement is part of the delivery architecture.
Implementation will hinge on how HHS, OMB, and DOJ translate broad statutory authorities into grant solicitations, metrics, and waiver templates. The statute ties priority to community indicators (age‑adjusted overdose and violence rates and child‑welfare/juvenile‑justice involvement), but collecting and validating those measures locally can be administratively heavy and politically sensitive.
The supplement‑not‑supplant language protects existing funding streams legally but creates gray zones for grantees trying to blend multiple federal, state, and private sources—especially when pilots rely on braided funding across programs and fiscal years.
The bill pushes cross‑agency pilots and pooled discretionary funding but leaves major operational questions to OMB guidance: what counts as start‑up funding, which statutory program rules can be waived, and how performance is attributed across agencies. Sustainability is another risk—many programs are designed as 4‑year grants with explicit expectations that communities identify post‑grant funding.
Without clear reimbursement models (and a CMS decision path), promising hospital or community interventions may struggle to scale beyond the demonstration period. Finally, the inclusion of law enforcement in trauma work raises trust trade‑offs in communities with fraught police relationships; training and referral models will need careful co‑design with affected communities to avoid re‑traumatization or deterrence from seeking services.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.