The Recommending Artificial Intelligence Standards in Education Act of 2025 (RAISE Act) would amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to push states to develop academic standards for artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies in elementary and secondary education. Specifically, Section 2 would insert language into Section 1111(b)(1)(C) clarifying that AI and other emerging technologies are within the scope of state-developed standards.
The bill does not specify funding, timelines, or enforcement mechanisms, leaving states to decide how to implement AI standards within existing accountability structures.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends 1111(b)(1)(C) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to include AI and other emerging technologies as part of the standards states must develop. It does not create a federal standard, nor does it authorize new funding or enforcement.
Who It Affects
State education agencies will lead standard development; local school districts will align curricula and assessments; teachers and school leaders will implement and assess toward AI standards; education technology publishers may align products to state standards.
Why It Matters
This establishes a national signal that AI literacy belongs in K-12 curricula, setting the stage for future policy, alignment across states, and potentially influencing resource allocation and instructional materials.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act would modify the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to push states to develop academic standards for artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies in K-12 education. The change is accomplished by inserting language into the statute that explicitly includes AI and emerging tech in the scope of state-developed standards.
There is no funding provision, timeline, or federal enforcement mechanism in the text, so states would determine how to build, test, and implement these standards within their existing educational frameworks. The intent is to encourage nationwide AI readiness in schools without mandating a uniform federal standard or allocating new federal dollars.
The result would be a more explicit expectation that AI literacy becomes part of state curricula, with implementation dependent on state and local decisions and resources.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends ESEA to require AI and emerging tech standards in state K-12 education standards.
The insertion occurs in Section 1111(b)(1)(C) after the phrase ‘by the State’.
No funding, timelines, or enforcement provisions are included in the current text.
Introduced on September 9, 2025 by Senator Husted with co-sponsors Blunt Rochester and Cassidy.
The act is titled the Recommending Artificial Intelligence Standards in Education Act of 2025 (RAISE Act).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the bill as the Recommending Artificial Intelligence Standards in Education Act of 2025 (RAISE Act). It sets the formal citation for future reference and discussion.
Academic standards for AI and technology education
This section amends Section 1111(b)(1)(C) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to insert the phrase that states shall develop standards for artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. The practical effect is to broaden the scope of what states must consider when crafting their K-12 standards, aligning future curricula with AI literacy without creating a federal standard or mandate.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State education agencies will lead the development of AI and emerging tech standards and coordinate with districts.
- Local education agencies (districts) will align curricula, instructional materials, and assessments to AI standards.
- K-12 students will receive education that includes AI literacy, accelerating preparation for AI-enabled workplaces.
- Educational publishers and ed-tech providers can align content and products to state standards, potentially expanding market opportunities.
- Educators and school leaders gain clearer guidance for instruction and professional development in AI-related topics.
Who Bears the Cost
- State education agencies will incur time and personnel costs to draft and coordinate AI standards across districts.
- Local districts may need to update curricula, purchase aligned instructional materials, and provide professional development for teachers.
- Teachers will need training to teach AI content effectively and meet new instructional expectations.
- Ed-tech publishers may incur costs to adapt products to evolving AI standards.
- State and local budgets may face pressure to fund standard development and implementation activities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
How to encourage nationwide AI readiness without mandating uniform federal standards or providing dedicated funding, while ensuring equity and avoiding a patchwork of divergent implementations across states.
The bill relies on state-led development of AI standards, with no federal funding or enforcement mechanism specified. This creates potential variability in how quickly and how robustly states adopt AI standards, depending on their existing resources and priorities.
Without a funding or accountability framework, adoption could be uneven, widening disparities between resource-rich and resource-constrained districts. The expansion to “emerging technologies” broadens scope beyond AI alone, which may complicate standard-setting efforts as educators balance rapid tech advances with established curricular structures.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.