The Keep Billionaires Out of Social Security Act would permanently appropriate funding for the Social Security Administration’s administrative expenses and implement a broad set of governance and oversight changes. It seeks to exempt SSA from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and certain executive orders, restrict access to beneficiary data by political appointees, and introduce new offices to oversee civil rights, transformation, analytics, review, and oversight.
The bill also expands SSA funding mechanisms, strengthens protections around overpayments, and creates targeted state and community grants to support beneficiaries, including those with disabilities.
Beyond funding, the bill shifts how SSA operates—from staffing and field-office management to data access, privacy enforcement, and program integrity. It lays out new rules on competitive staffing, requires deceased individuals to appear on the Death Master File, preserves field-office presence, and mandates online accessibility options for beneficiaries.
Taken together, the provisions aim to reshape SSA administration, bolster beneficiary protections, and increase the agency’s operational scale and accessibility.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill permanently appropriates SSA administrative costs and establishes a funding formula based on 1.2% of annual benefit payments (plus portions to other titles) drawn from multiple trust funds and the general fund as applicable. It also creates governance changes, limits external oversight of SSA, tightens data privacy rules, and expands beneficiary services and protections.
Who It Affects
SSA components and personnel, beneficiaries and applicants (including those with disabilities), states operating protection and advocacy systems, and community-based organizations involved in disability services.
Why It Matters
It signals a fundamental shift in SSA funding certainty, governance structure, and service delivery, with potential impacts on privacy enforcement, civil rights oversight, and the availability of legal and advocacy support for beneficiaries.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act consolidates its core aim around three pillars: funding stability for SSA, governance reforms to the agency, and expanded beneficiary supports. First, it locks in a permanent funding mechanism for administrative expenses, introducing a formula tied to the level of benefit payments and supported by various trust funds and general revenue where appropriate.
Second, it reconfigures governance by carving out SSA from a separate federal governance framework (DOGE) and from certain executive orders, while creating dedicated offices for Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity, Transformation, Analysis, Review, and Oversight. These offices would be staffed by career SSA personnel and would assume responsibility for policy development, program evaluation, and anti-discrimination efforts.
Third, the bill broadens the universe of SSA activities it funds, including improved customer experience, better IT infrastructure, and expanded online services, while also strengthening protections around data privacy and overpayments.
A central feature is the funding and oversight shift: SSA’s operating costs would be funded through a specific, formula-driven appropriation, reducing dependence on annual discretionary budget battles. In addition to routine funding, the act would authorize substantial new grants to states and community organizations to safeguard the rights of SSI and SSDI applicants and beneficiaries, and to support disability advocacy and representation.
The package also includes stricter rules about who can access beneficiary data, with civil and criminal penalties for improper disclosures, and it envisions a more robust internal governance structure to oversee program integrity, civil rights enforcement, and system modernization. Taken together, these provisions aim to modernize SSA administration, improve beneficiary outcomes, and ensure greater protection for sensitive data and disability rights.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a permanent appropriations mechanism for SSA administrative costs starting in fiscal year 2026.
SSA would be exempt from DOGE jurisdiction and from specified executive orders.
New civil and criminal penalties would govern improper access to beneficiary data.
The act establishes new Offices for Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity, Transformation, Analytics, Review, and Oversight.
Significant new funding and grants would expand disability advocacy, online services, and beneficiary protections.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Exemption from DOGE and certain EO requirements
This section removes the Social Security Administration from the jurisdiction of the Department of Government Efficiency and excludes the SSA from the application of certain executive orders. It defines the covered SSA agencies, personnel, and systems, and lists the specific executive orders and related entities impacted. The intent is to insulate SSA governance and operations from external mandates that might otherwise constrain or alter its administration.
Access by political appointees and special government employees
Amends Section 1106 to prohibit access by political appointees and certain SGEs to beneficiary data systems, subject to a narrow exception for staff who research or improve SSA benefit delivery. It defines what counts as a beneficiary data system and sets civil and criminal penalties for improper disclosure or access, including damages, attorney costs, and, for the United States, prevailing-party treatment. The section also establishes a reporting requirement for violations to Congress via the Inspector General.
Limitations on competitive service exemptions and transfers
This section tightens controls around exempting SSA positions from competitive service and by limiting transfers between competitive and excepted service. It specifies schedules and conditions under which transfers may occur, imposes annual limits during a presidential term, and requires employee consent for any changes in status. The intended effect is to curb ad hoc staffing changes and preserve a predictable, merit-based workforce structure.
Death Master File requirements
Revises the Death Master File provisions to ensure that only deceased individuals are added to the file, replacing looser language with a requirement that the Commissioner of Social Security rely on clear and convincing evidence when presuming death. This reinforces accuracy and privacy protections in death-data matching and its use in benefit decisions.
Field and hearing office operations and access
Adds a new subsection to strengthen field and hearing office access and continuity of service. The Commissioner must maintain existing offices, avoid unwarranted closures or reductions, provide live operator access, and improve telephone wait times and other service metrics within a defined timeframe. The section also allows for new offices and expanded services, while resisting reductions in public access.
Reestablishing Civil Rights, Transformation, and Oversight offices
Creates a structured Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity and an Office of Transformation, plus an Office of Analytics, Review, and Oversight. Each office is led by a career SSA appointee and is charged with policy development, complaint processing, disability accommodations, data systems, strategic guidance, and program evaluation. The framework emphasizes inclusive employment, disability rights enforcement, and governance analytics.
Funding for SSA administrative expenses
Amends the funding mechanism to provide a consistent annual appropriation for title II administration (and related titles) at a level derived from 1.2% of benefit payments, with breakdowns across the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and contributions to Medicare and general funds as appropriate. It also removes prior discretionary-budget caps and aligns funding with long-term benefit obligations.
Additional funding to improve SSA customer experience
Authorizes a multi-year appropriation ($2B from 2026 to 2035) to improve eligibility awareness, clear disability benefit backlogs, modernize IT, and expand online services. It requires annual reporting to Congress on progress and actions taken to address identified issues, supporting ongoing program modernization and service improvement.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Beneficiaries and applicants for Social Security programs, including those with disabilities, who would experience improved service access, online capability, and more stable program administration.
- States and protection and advocacy systems funded under Sec. 11, which would receive grants to protect the legal rights of SSI/SSDI applicants and beneficiaries.
- Community-based disability organizations that would receive long-term, substantial grants (not less than $500,000) to aid applicants, appeals processes, and access to benefits.
- The general public and SSA workforce through enhanced civil rights oversight, transformation initiatives, and analytics that aim to improve efficiency and fairness in program delivery.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal budget authorities and the Treasury, due to new funding formulas and the removal of discretionary caps.
- SSA operations and IT modernization costs, while designed to be offset by the proposed funding mechanism.
- Fragmentation costs associated with new offices and governance structures, including ongoing administrative and personnel costs to sustain the Offices of Civil Rights, Transformation, and Analytics, Review, and Oversight.
- Costs to states and organizations implementing new protection and advocacy provisions and expanded grant programs, including reporting and compliance obligations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill seeks stronger internal governance and greater funding certainty for SSA while limiting external governance and oversight. The central dilemma is balancing autonomy and rapid modernization with accountability, privacy protection, and equitable access to services.
The bill introduces substantial governance changes, funding shifts, and new oversight structures that could complicate accountability and privacy protections. While the funding guarantees aim to stabilize SSA operations, the exemption from DOGE and certain EO requirements may reduce external checks on SSA management.
The data-access restrictions for political appointees and SGEs intend to protect beneficiary information, but enforcement relies on Inspector General oversight and civil/criminal penalties that could impose costly litigation. Creating multiple new offices will require careful coordination to avoid overlap and ensure consistent policy implementation across SSA programs.
Finally, while the new grants and customer-experience funding are designed to improve outcomes, they will demand robust grant management, reporting, and performance evaluation to prevent inefficiencies and ensure true program integrity.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.