The bill would amend federal law to allow qualified prosecutors and qualified Federal judges to carry a concealed firearm, subject to identification and active-duty firearms training standards. It also extends the same framework to qualified retired prosecutors and qualified retired Federal judges, with a parallel certification process.
In addition to broadening who can carry, the bill defines key terms and directs the Attorney General and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to draft implementing regulations.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends 18 U.S.C. § 926B to include qualified prosecutors and qualified Federal judges, adds a robust identification-and-qualification framework, and creates a parallel path for qualified retired prosecutors and judges.
Who It Affects
Federal prosecutors, Federal judges, qualified retired prosecutors and judges, and the agencies and instructors that administer firearms qualifications.
Why It Matters
It establishes a formal, cross-cutting framework for who may carry concealed firearms among high-risk officials, with defined standards and oversight, potentially affecting security practices and interjurisdictional consistency.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill expands the existing concealed carry rules to cover two new categories: qualified prosecutors and qualified Federal judges. It amends 18 U.S.C. § 926B to insert these groups alongside previously covered law enforcement officers, and it also extends the same framework to qualified retired prosecutors and retired Federal judges under 18 U.S.C. § 926C.
The core of the proposal is to provide a practical path for obtaining and maintaining a concealed-carry credential, including two possible routes for proof of qualification: either agency-issued testing that confirms active-duty standards or state-issued certification via a certified firearms instructor. The definition sections clarify what counts as a firearm, and who qualifies as a prosecutor, judge, or retiree under the new regime.
Finally, the bill directs the executive branch to issue implementing regulations to operationalize these changes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds ‘qualified prosecutors’ and ‘qualified Federal judges’ to the concealed-carry framework.
Identifications for carry include agency-issued IDs and a firearms-qualification certification.
A separate track covers qualified retired prosecutors and qualified retired Federal judges.
Active-duty firearms-qualification standards, or appropriate state standards, govern eligibility.
Regulations to implement these changes would be issued by the Attorney General and the Director of the AOUSC.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Authority to Carry a Concealed Firearm
Section 2 expands 18 U.S.C. § 926B to include qualified prosecutors and qualified Federal judges in the concealed-carry framework, and to rework the related subsections to accommodate these new categories. It also reshapes the identification and verification requirements to ensure that eligible individuals can demonstrate both identification and appropriate firearms qualification before carrying a concealed firearm.
Retired Prosecutors and Federal Judges
Section 2(b) extends the concealed-carry framework to qualified retired prosecutors and qualified retired Federal judges, aligning their identification and certification requirements with those for active officials, including testing or recognized standards from states or certified instructors.
Definitions and Standards
Section 2 adds definitions for ‘firearm,’ ‘qualified Federal judge,’ ‘qualified prosecutor,’ and related terms to ensure consistent interpretation across agencies. It establishes the criteria that individuals must meet to be considered qualified for the purposes of carrying a concealed firearm.
Technical and Conforming Amendment
Section 2(c) makes a conforming change to the table of sections in chapter 44 of title 18, updating the cross-references to reflect the new and revised sections (926B and 926C). This ensures the statutory framework remains coherent and navigable.
Regulations
Section 2(d) authorizes the Attorney General and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the amendments, establishing a concrete path for rulemaking and administrative oversight.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal prosecutors who meet the newly defined “qualified prosecutor” criteria and can carry concealed firearms under agency rules.
- Federal judges who meet the “qualified Federal judge” criteria and may carry concealed firearms when authorized.
- Qualified retired prosecutors and qualified retired Federal judges who elect to carry under the expanded framework.
- State and federal agencies that administer firearm-qualification programs and oversee compliance, creating formal pathways for certification.
- Certified firearms instructors and state training agencies that provide or verify qualifications under approved standards.
Who Bears the Cost
- Agencies that must administer and verify identity, fitness for duty, and ongoing qualification requirements.
- Prosecutors, judges, and retirees who must obtain and maintain certifications and comply with testing requirements.
- Certified firearms instructors who conduct state- or agency-approved qualification tests and maintain records.
- State and federal training entities aligning their standards and processes with the new framework.
- The judiciary’s administrative offices that will implement and monitor the regulatory framework and compliance.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing expanded carry privileges for high-level public officials with safety and standardization across jurisdictions—the same pool of professionals may face different baseline standards, and the reliance on varied state or agency qualifications could create a patchwork rather than a uniform system.
The bill creates a formal, cross-jurisdictional framework for concealed-carry eligibility among prosecutors and judges, including retirees. This raises policy tensions around security risks, consistency of standards across states, and the administrative burden of implementing and overseeing qualification programs.
The approach relies on either agency-administered active-duty standards or state standards certified by instructors, which could lead to variability in how qualifications are demonstrated across jurisdictions. The need for implementing regulations signals potential later questions over funding, enforcement, and periodic requalification cycles.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.