HB0095 amends W.S. 6-8-105 to add a new paragraph explicitly allowing persons lawfully carrying concealed weapons under W.S. 6-8-104(a)(ii)–(iv) to carry at any public college or university facility, except at public college or university athletic events where alcoholic beverages are being sold. The bill also renumbers the existing paragraph structure, adjusts a cross-reference in subsection (f), repeals W.S. 6-8-105(c)(iii), and sets an effective date of July 1, 2026.
The change shifts the locus of control over concealed firearms on campus from institutional policies toward state law by creating a blanket statutory entitlement for covered carriers on public higher education property, subject only to the single alcohol/athletics exception. That raises immediate operational questions for campus security, university counsel, insurers, and administrators about enforcement, liability, and how campus rules will align with the amended statute.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts a new W.S. 6-8-105(b)(iv) granting persons carrying under W.S. 6-8-104(a)(ii)–(iv) the right to carry concealed weapons on any public college or university facility, except at athletic events where alcohol is sold. It renumbers the subsequent paragraph and modifies subsection (f)'s cross-reference; it also repeals W.S. 6-8-105(c)(iii).
Who It Affects
Individuals who are authorized to carry concealed under W.S. 6-8-104(a)(ii)–(iv) (the categories set out in state law) will gain explicit access to campus facilities. Public colleges and universities, campus security departments, university counsel, student organizations, and event operators (especially athletics and concessions) will be directly affected.
Why It Matters
The bill reduces universities' ability to restrict concealed carry on public campus property, narrowing institutional discretion and moving authorization into statute. That alters risk profiles for campus operations, insurance, and emergency planning and could create compliance and enforcement challenges for campus police and administrators.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB0095 changes Wyoming’s concealed-carry exception list in W.S. 6-8-105 by adding a new paragraph that explicitly permits persons who are lawfully carrying concealed weapons under the referenced parts of W.S. 6-8-104 to take those weapons onto any public college or university facility. The single carve‑out the bill creates is limited and operationally specific: carriers are still prohibited at public college or university athletic events when alcoholic beverages are being sold.
The bill also performs housekeeping: it renumbers the former paragraph (iv) to (v), adjusts the introductory language of subsection (f) so that school-district employee and volunteer rules refer to the new paragraph designation, and removes subsection (c)(iii) from the statute. The net effect is to create an explicit, statewide statutory authorization for covered carriers on public higher-education property while removing the prior subsection that the Legislature chose to repeal.For campus administrators the statutory change is consequential not because it creates new criminal penalties but because it places the legal right to be armed on campus into state law rather than campus policy.
That changes the starting point for compliance: universities can still adopt rules about conduct, possession in specific locations, or response protocols, but those rules cannot criminalize or categorically bar the presence of persons who meet the statutory carry criteria on campus property except in the narrow alcohol-at-athletics circumstance laid out in the bill.Operational questions follow: how campuses will detect and respond to concealed firearms; whether disciplinary rules that previously relied on a categorical ban will need revision; how campus events with mixed private and public control (for example, leased facilities, privately run student events, or third-party concessions) will be treated; and how campus insurance and liability exposure will change. The bill’s effective date is July 1, 2026, which creates a window for universities to review policies and adapt procedures before the statutory change takes effect.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds W.S. 6-8-105(b)(iv) to allow persons lawfully carrying under W.S. 6-8-104(a)(ii)–(iv) to carry concealed on any public college or university facility, except at athletic events where alcoholic beverages are sold.
It renumbers the existing paragraph (iv) as (v) to accommodate the new campus provision.
Subsection (f)’s introductory cross-reference is amended so that school district board rules for employees and volunteers point to the newly numbered paragraph; this affects K‑12 board rule language by changing the statutory citation.
The bill repeals W.S. 6-8-105(c)(iii), removing that specific subsection from statute (the bill text does not replace it).
The act takes effect July 1, 2026, giving public institutions a defined lead time to revise policies and operational plans.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Permitless carry explicitly authorized on public college/university property; housekeeping renumbering and cross‑reference change
This provision creates a new paragraph in subsection (b) to declare that persons carrying under W.S. 6-8-104(a)(ii)–(iv) may carry concealed weapons at any public college or university facility, with the single exception for athletic events when alcohol is sold. It simultaneously renumbers the preexisting paragraph (iv) as (v). The section also alters the introductory language of subsection (f) to make the school-district board rules reference the new paragraph numbering. Practically, the amendment elevates statutory authorization over prior campus prohibitions and requires administrators to reconcile existing campus rules with the updated citations.
Removal of an existing subsection
This section deletes W.S. 6-8-105(c)(iii) in full. The bill text does not supply replacement language for whatever that subsection previously addressed, so its repeal could eliminate an exception, prohibition, or procedural rule that practitioners relied on. Counsel for institutions will need to check the prior text of (c)(iii) to understand what statutory authority or restriction has been removed and whether any administrative practices must change.
Effective date
The act becomes effective July 1, 2026. That fixed date gives public colleges, universities, and school districts a transition period to review campus safety plans, update policies and signage, train personnel, and coordinate with insurers and legal counsel on the implications of the statutory change.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Criminal Justice across all five countries.
Explore Criminal Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Individuals covered by W.S. 6-8-104(a)(ii)–(iv): The bill gives those lawful carriers an explicit statutory right to carry concealed on public college and university property (except at alcohol‑sold athletic events), reducing uncertainty about whether campus rules can bar them.
- Students, staff, or visitors who carry for self‑defense and already comply with state carry criteria: They gain access to campus facilities without relying on institution-level exceptions or permissions.
- Firearm advocacy and training organizations: The statutory clarity may increase demand for compliance training, permitting advice, and defensive firearm education targeted to campus populations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Public colleges and universities (administration and campus security): Institutions must revise policies, update signage, retrain security personnel, and potentially alter emergency response protocols when concealed firearms are present on campus.
- Campus insurers and risk-management offices: Broader statutory carry rights change risk profiles and could affect premiums, coverage terms, and liability exposure for campus events and facilities.
- Students, faculty, and staff concerned about safety: Those who preferred campus bans now face an environment with legally carried concealed firearms, which could necessitate additional investment in safety measures or counseling services.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanding individual carriage rights on public campuses and preserving institutional authority to set and enforce safety rules: the bill grants carriers a statutory right to be armed on campus while leaving universities to manage the practical safety, liability, and community‑confidence consequences without new tools or guidance from the Legislature.
The bill draws a clear legal line in favor of carriers covered by W.S. 6-8-104(a)(ii)–(iv) but leaves multiple operational and legal questions unresolved. First, the statute creates a bright entitlement to carry on public campus property while not addressing how campus authorities should identify or manage concealed carriers during events, classes, or emergencies.
Concealed carry by its nature limits detection, so enforcement will rely on behavior-based rules (brandishing, threats) rather than possession alone, shifting the burden to security and judicial processes.
Second, the single exception—athletic events where alcoholic beverages are being sold—invites practical complications. Institutions and event operators will need clear policies and communications about when an event crosses the threshold of “alcoholic beverages being sold,” how leased or privately run events on campus are handled, and how to enforce the prohibition without escalating confrontation.
Third, the repeal of subsection (c)(iii) removes an element of the prior statutory framework without replacement; that deletion could create interpretive gaps that prompt litigation or require regulatory clarification. Finally, the amendment changes the balance between institutional autonomy and state preemption, raising questions about the interplay of campus disciplinary codes, contractual restrictions for third-party vendors, and federal or other state rules that interact with campus life.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.