The ANCHOR Act of 2025 amends section 1902 of the Social Security Act to establish a voluntary state option to provide Medicaid medical assistance to certain uninsured adults who have a qualifying behavioral‑health condition. Eligible people must be uninsured (as defined in statute), have income at or below 100% of the federal poverty line, and be diagnosed with serious mental illness, serious emotional disturbance, opioid use disorder, or stimulant use disorder by an approved provider or designated state entity.
The bill sets administrative guardrails: coverage is provided for an initial continuous 12‑month period (with state discretion to renew annually after redetermination), states must ensure a care plan is developed within 60 days, and must report behavioral‑health measures from the Adult Core Set under Medicaid reporting requirements. That mix of eligibility, care‑planning, and metric reporting creates operational and fiscal choices for Medicaid agencies, providers, and state public‑safety and child‑welfare systems considering adoption.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new optional eligibility category to Medicaid (via amendments to §1902) allowing states to enroll 'specified individuals'—uninsured adults at or below 100% FPL with defined behavioral‑health diagnoses. It requires an initial 1‑year continuous eligibility period, a 60‑day care‑plan requirement, and state reporting of Core Set behavioral‑health measures.
Who It Affects
State Medicaid agencies deciding whether to adopt the option; behavioral‑health providers (community health centers, certified community behavioral health clinics, emergency departments, and institutions that may determine eligibility); justice, law‑enforcement, and child‑welfare agencies listed as possible determiners; and uninsured low‑income adults with serious mental illness or substance use disorders.
Why It Matters
This creates a targeted route into Medicaid for a population frequently left uninsured and high‑cost to emergency and justice systems, while imposing explicit quality and reporting requirements. Because adoption is optional, the bill shifts a policy decision to states — creating potential variation in coverage and administrative burden across jurisdictions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The ANCHOR Act inserts a new, optional pathway under Medicaid for a narrowly defined group it calls 'specified individuals.' To qualify, a person must be uninsured under existing statutory definitions, have income at or below 100 percent of the federal poverty line as calculated under existing Medicaid rules, and have a qualifying behavioral‑health condition. The bill lists four qualifying conditions: serious mental illness, serious emotional disturbance, opioid use disorder, and stimulant use disorder (explicitly including cocaine and methamphetamine).
Determination of a qualifying condition may come from a wide range of sources the state accepts: health care providers, emergency departments, federally qualified community clinics, certified community behavioral health clinics, entities that receive state funding for behavioral health services, institutions for mental diseases, or even state judicial, law enforcement, or child‑welfare agencies. That flexibility is meant to capture people who present in different settings, but it also creates variability in how states will operationalize eligibility determinations.Coverage under the option is defined to match the "scope and manner" of medical assistance already provided to another Medicaid group referenced in the statute, and it must be provided continuously for an initial 12‑month period.
States may extend coverage in subsequent 12‑month increments, but only after redetermining continued eligibility. The bill also conditions state participation on two quality controls: the state must ensure a qualified provider develops an individualized care plan within 60 days of enrollment, and the state must report behavioral‑health performance measures from the Adult Core Set for these enrollees in accordance with Medicaid reporting rules.Operationally, the measure plugs into existing Medicaid eligibility, income‑counting, and reporting frameworks by cross‑reference to other statutory definitions (poverty line, uninsured definition, and existing reporting section 1139B).
That design minimizes the need for wholly new federal rules but requires states to adapt intake, redetermination, care‑planning, and data collection processes to track the new population and meet the 60‑day and reporting deadlines.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill limits eligibility to uninsured individuals whose income does not exceed 100% of the federal poverty line as determined under current Medicaid income rules.
Qualifying conditions are limited to serious mental illness, serious emotional disturbance, opioid use disorder, and stimulant use disorder (the text expressly cites cocaine and methamphetamine).
Entities authorized to determine a qualifying condition include not only clinical providers and certified community behavioral health clinics but also emergency departments, institutions for mental diseases, and certain state judicial, law‑enforcement, or child‑welfare agencies.
Coverage is guaranteed for an initial continuous 12‑month period; states may choose to renew in subsequent 12‑month blocks but must redetermine eligibility before each renewal.
A state that adopts the option must ensure a qualified provider develops a care plan within 60 days of enrollment and must report behavioral‑health measures from the Adult Core Set under section 1139B.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the bill as the 'Access to New Community Health Opportunities and Recovery Act of 2025' or the 'ANCHOR Act of 2025.' This is a naming provision with no programmatic effect, but it signals the bill's policy focus on community‑based behavioral‑health access and recovery services.
Adds a new optional eligibility subclause (XXIV)
The bill inserts a new subclause into the Medicaid eligibility list authorizing states to provide medical assistance to 'specified individuals.' Procedurally, this creates a clear statutory hook under §1902 for states to submit SPA (State Plan Amendment) requests adopting the new group, rather than requiring a waiver. That placement means federal Medicaid matching funds will apply under ordinary §1903 rules, subject to the state's regular share, because the provision modifies §1902 rather than establishing a separate grant program.
Who counts as a 'specified individual'
This paragraph cross‑references the statute's existing definition of 'uninsured' and the Medicaid income determination rules, setting a hard income ceiling at 100% of the federal poverty line. It centralizes three eligibility gates—insurance status, income, and a qualifying behavioral‑health diagnosis—so states can operationalize intake by checking those three items against existing systems. Because the bill references other statutory definitions instead of restating them, states must align SPA language and eligibility systems with those cross‑referenced provisions.
Defined diagnoses and who may diagnose or certify them
The bill enumerates four qualifying conditions and then lists a broad and heterogeneous set of entities that may make the determination, including clinical providers, certified community behavioral health clinics, emergency departments, state‑funded behavioral health providers, institutions for mental diseases, and certain state agencies (judicial, law enforcement, child welfare). That breadth is intended to lower barriers to eligibility for people encountered in nontraditional entry points, but it also invites states to create protocols to ensure consistent clinical determinations and to manage potential definitional disputes.
Initial continuous 12‑month eligibility, renewal rules, care‑plan timeline, and reporting requirement
Subsection (yy)(3) requires an initial continuous 1‑year coverage period and allows optional annual renewals after state redetermination. Subsection (yy)(4) conditions state participation on two obligations: (A) the state must ensure a care plan is developed within 60 days by a qualified provider and (B) the state must report behavioral‑health measures from the Adult Core Set under §1139B. These are operationally significant: the 60‑day timeline may require workflow changes at intake, and Core Set reporting will require states to track this cohort separately or map them into existing reporting flows.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Uninsured, low‑income adults with serious mental illness or substance use disorders — they gain a clear pathway to Medicaid‑paid services for at least 12 months, including a mandated care plan.
- Community behavioral‑health providers and certified community behavioral health clinics — adoption can expand Medicaid reimbursement for services they already deliver to uninsured patients and reduce uncompensated care.
- Hospitals and emergency departments — the option provides a route to shift treatment costs for frequent behavioral‑health utilizers who are currently uninsured, potentially lowering uncompensated emergency care.
- State public‑safety and child‑welfare agencies — having a Medicaid coverage option for people they encounter may reduce downstream costs related to untreated behavioral‑health conditions and enable earlier linkage to treatment.
- State Medicaid programs seeking targeted interventions — the option lets Medicaid agencies pursue a narrowly scoped enrollment group without changing broader categorical eligibility rules.
Who Bears the Cost
- State Medicaid programs — adopting the option creates additional enrollment and service costs and administrative responsibilities (intake, redetermination, care‑plan oversight, data reporting), financed under standard federal/state matching rules.
- Behavioral‑health and primary‑care providers — they must meet the 60‑day care‑plan requirement and participate in data collection/reporting, which will impose documentation and coordination burdens.
- Hospitals and emergency departments — they may need to implement screening and referral processes and coordinate with state systems to document diagnoses and start care plans within 60 days.
- State budgets and fiscal offices — if states expand, they face budgetary tradeoffs and potential increases in near‑term spending even though some savings may accrue elsewhere (safety net, justice system).
- Medicaid IT and data systems teams — they must modify eligibility, tracking, and reporting systems to identify the cohort and supply Adult Core Set measures as required.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill confronts a classic trade‑off: expand coverage for a high‑need, uninsured behavioral‑health population and impose structured quality and reporting rules, or avoid new state fiscal and administrative burdens by leaving the status quo intact. Expanding access can reduce uncompensated care and improve outcomes, but it requires states to accept new costs, implement timely care‑planning and data systems, and manage variable eligibility determinations across diverse entry points.
The bill targets a narrowly defined group and routes them into Medicaid via an optional state plan change, which minimizes the need for new federal rulemaking but shifts the hard work to states. States choosing to adopt will need to reconcile multiple cross‑referenced statutory definitions (the definition of 'uninsured,' income counting rules under subsection (e)(14), and the poverty line reference), and to build intake workflows that capture a sometimes transient population.
The practical effects of allowing nonclinical determiners (judicial or law‑enforcement agencies) to certify qualifying conditions raise questions about clinical consistency, due process, and appropriate documentation standards.
Financially, because the provision is an addition to §1902, services would be financed under ordinary Medicaid matching rules; the bill does not provide an enhanced FMAP or separate federal funding for administrative costs. That means states bear part of the fiscal risk and must weigh short‑term budget impacts against potential downstream savings in emergency care, criminal‑justice, or homelessness systems.
The 60‑day care‑plan deadline and the requirement to report Adult Core Set behavioral‑health measures create measurable quality expectations but also administrative and IT burdens that could slow rollout or limit provider participation. Finally, the initial continuous 12‑month coverage followed by state redetermination can create churn risks if states do not choose to renew or if administrative redeterminations are slow or inconsistent.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.