SB 3410 authorizes agencies to create dedicated technology and artificial intelligence talent teams (including recruiters, certificate coordinators, assessment experts, and subject matter experts) to support competitive‑service hiring for AI and related roles. The bill also permits the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to form a Federal technology and AI talent team to lead cross‑Government pooled hiring, develop technical assessments, share certificates of eligibles and resumes, and operate an online platform for assessment sharing and customization.
This is a structural, operational bill aimed at reducing hiring friction for mission‑critical tech roles. It changes how examinations can be developed and administered (formalizing subject matter expert involvement), requires OPM to provide shared tools and training, and places new transparency requirements around the limited use of automated self‑assessments—plus a waiver process for agencies.
For HR leaders and program managers, the measure creates reusable assessment assets and pooled hiring pathways; for OPM and agencies it creates new implementation and oversight responsibilities.
At a Glance
What It Does
Permits agencies to establish technology and AI talent teams to design and deliver competitive‑service hiring actions, and authorizes OPM to run a cross‑government talent team and an online platform to share and customize technical assessments. It formalizes a role for subject matter experts to develop and administer position‑specific assessments and enables sharing of certificates of eligibles and resumes across agencies.
Who It Affects
Federal HR offices, Chief Human Capital Officers, hiring managers for tech and AI positions, subject matter experts inside agencies, OPM staff, and vendors or platforms that host federal hiring assessments (including USA Hire). Job applicants for competitive‑service technology roles will be evaluated under more standardized, assessment‑driven processes.
Why It Matters
The bill removes procedural barriers that have slowed technical hiring by creating reusable, shareable assessment assets and pooled hiring workflows. If implemented, agencies could fill AI and tech roles faster and more consistently—but doing so shifts validation, training, and platform responsibilities onto OPM and agency HR teams.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 3410 creates two complementary layers of capacity: agency‑level talent teams and an OPM‑led cross‑Government talent team. At the agency level, teams can be set up at the component level and must include roles such as certificate coordinators, recruiters, assessment experts, and subject matter experts; those teams provide direct hiring support, from refining exams and drafting competitive‑service job announcements to producing and sharing high‑quality certificates of eligibles.
OPM’s role is both enabling and operational. The Director may stand up a Federal technology and AI talent team that leads pooled hiring efforts, produces technical assessments, trains agency staff, and hosts an online platform where agencies can share and customize assessments.
The statute expressly allows OPM to facilitate sharing of certificates of eligibles and accompanying resumes under existing authorities in title 5, a move intended to reduce duplication and accelerate candidate referrals across agencies.On assessments, the bill authorizes subject matter experts—internal employees or selecting officials with relevant knowledge—to partner with HR to develop position‑specific technical assessments and to administer them for qualification or category‑rating purposes. Agencies may share assessments with one another and may customize shared content but must comply with existing regulatory requirements (part 300 of title 5).
OPM must operate the online platform but is not required to independently validate the utility of submitted assessment content; instead, the platform must include user ratings so agencies can surface higher‑value materials.The bill restricts reliance on automated self‑assessments: starting five years after enactment, examinations may not 'solely or principally' rely on automated self‑assessments unless a Chief Human Capital Officer issues a waiver supported by a 30‑day written justification to OPM; OPM will post those waivers publicly. The measure also encourages using existing tools where practical (for example, USA Hire).
Finally, the statute supplies definitions—what counts as an 'examination,' who is an 'examining agency,' and what constitutes a 'technical assessment'—to align these reforms with current competitive‑service law.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Agencies may create one or more technology and AI talent teams (including shared certificate coordinators, recruiters, assessment experts, and SMEs) to run and support competitive‑service hiring for tech roles.
OPM may form a Federal technology and AI talent team to lead cross‑Government pooled hiring, develop technical assessments, provide training, and operate an online platform for sharing and customizing assessments.
Subject matter experts designated by agencies can develop position‑specific technical assessments in partnership with HR and may administer those assessments to determine qualification or to rank applicants for category rating.
OPM must run an online assessment‑sharing platform but is explicitly exempted from independently validating the utility of content; the platform must let users rate assessment materials so higher‑value items surface to other agencies.
Starting five years after enactment, examinations may not solely or principally depend on automated self‑assessments unless a Chief Human Capital Officer grants a waiver, submits a written justification to OPM within 30 days, and OPM posts that waiver publicly.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Agency technology and AI talent teams
This subsection authorizes agencies (as defined by reference to 31 U.S.C. 901(b)) to establish one or more specialized talent teams at the agency or component level. The teams are structured to include recruiters, certificate coordinators, assessment experts, SMEs, and non‑technical governance roles, and their duties center on improving examinations, drafting competitive‑service job announcements, producing and sharing certificates of eligibles, and facilitating competitive‑service hires. Practically, this codifies a reusable internal capacity model — agencies will need to assign staff, set procedures for certificate sharing, and align component practices with central HR rules.
OPM Federal technology and AI talent team and centralized support
The Director of OPM may establish a Government‑wide technology and AI talent team to support agency efforts, lead pooled hiring, develop technical assessments, and provide training. The provision authorizes OPM to share certificates and resumes under existing title 5 authorities and to expand its 'hiring experience' team to focus on surge and pooled hiring for AI roles. This creates a central coordinator role for cross‑agency candidate engagement and standard setting but does not convert OPM into a content validator for assessments.
Technical assessments: development, sharing, and platforms
Subject matter experts may, in partnership with HR, create and administer position‑specific technical assessments that demonstrate job‑related skills and can be used for qualification or category ranking. Agencies may share assessments with others and customize shared content provided they meet part 300 regulatory standards. OPM must establish an online platform to host shared assessments; the statute requires the platform to permit user ratings of assessment utility and says OPM is not responsible for independently validating content. Agencies are encouraged to leverage existing systems such as USA Hire where practicable.
Definitions and limits on automated self‑assessments; waiver and transparency
The bill defines 'examination' expansively to include demonstrated assessments and SME‑informed resume reviews, and specifies that, five years after enactment, examinations may no longer solely or principally rely on automated self‑assessments. A Chief Human Capital Officer may waive that restriction but must submit a written justification to OPM within 30 days; OPM will publish any received waiver on a public website and the waiver does not take effect until posted. The definitions section also clarifies terms like 'examining agency,' 'subject matter expert,' and 'technical assessment' to align with competitive‑service law.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Agency hiring managers for AI and tech roles — they gain reusable, position‑specific assessments and access to pooled certificates of eligibles that can speed candidate selection and reduce repeated testing.
- Subject matter experts (SMEs) inside agencies — the bill formalizes their role in test development and administration, giving them authority to shape assessments that reflect current technical needs.
- Federal tech job applicants — candidates should face clearer, job‑relevant assessments and coordinated, cross‑agency pooled hiring that can reduce duplication of application effort and time to hire.
Who Bears the Cost
- Agencies and CHCO offices — must staff, train, and sustain talent teams, adapt existing HR processes to new pooled hiring workflows, and manage data sharing and platform integration costs.
- OPM — must build and operate the assessment‑sharing platform, expand the hiring experience team, produce assessments and training materials, and handle public posting obligations for waivers without an explicit funding stream in the bill.
- Subject matter experts and hiring managers — will need to allocate substantive time to develop, maintain, and rate technical assessments, adding operational workload that may not be backfilled.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is speed and scale versus validity and risk control: SB 3410 pushes to streamline and centralize assessment assets and pooled hiring to fill mission‑critical AI roles faster, but doing so risks deploying inadequately validated assessments and shifting operational and legal exposure to agencies and SMEs unless OPM or agencies invest in rigorous validation, oversight, and resources.
The bill centralizes tools and assets without requiring OPM to validate content quality, which accelerates sharing but moves validation responsibility to agencies and their SMEs. That approach can speed deployment of assessments but also risks propagation of poorly designed or biased instruments if agencies do not invest in psychometric validation and quality control.
The statute references compliance with part 300 of title 5 for customized assessments, but does not specify standards, validation protocols, or liability rules for adverse selection outcomes.
The five‑year restriction on automated self‑assessments balances accuracy concerns with operational convenience, yet the waiver process places the burden on CHCOs to justify exceptions and on OPM to publish them; it does not specify review criteria, nor does it require independent audit of waivers or post‑implementation outcomes. The platform’s user‑rating mechanic provides a market signal about utility but can be gamed, and OPM’s explicit non‑validation posture could leave agencies exposed to legal risk if low‑quality assessments produce discriminatory hiring results.
Finally, the bill creates unfunded operational work: standing up teams, training SMEs, and integrating platform tools will absorb HR bandwidth and technical procurement effort that smaller components may struggle to meet without additional resources.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.