Codify — Article

Water Infrastructure Resilience Act extends program authorizations to 2031

Extends clean water and drinking water resilience programs through fiscal year 2031 to maintain continuity of federal support.

The Brief

The bill reauthorizes two key federal programs that fund resilience and sustainability upgrades for water systems: the clean water infrastructure resiliency and sustainability program and the drinking water infrastructure resilience and sustainability programs. It extends the authorization window for these programs from fiscal years 2022–2026 to fiscal years 2027–2031.

The changes affect the statutory authorities within the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act, ensuring continued federal support for infrastructure modernization. The bill does not create new programs or set new funding levels; instead, it preserves and extends existing authorities to enable planning and investments over a longer horizon.

At a Glance

What It Does

Extends the authorizations for the clean water program and the drinking water resilience programs, updating the relevant statutory windows from 2022–2026 to 2027–2031.

Who It Affects

Federal program administrators, state environmental agencies, and water utilities (both drinking water systems and wastewater infrastructure) that participate in resilience and sustainability funding.

Why It Matters

Provides long-term funding certainty and planning stability for resilience upgrades in water infrastructure, aligning program lifespans with capital project timelines.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act of 2026 reauthorizes federal funding for two major resilience programs tied to water infrastructure. Section 101 of Title I updates the clean water program by extending the authorization period from fiscal years 2022–2026 to 2027–2031, effectively renewing the program through the end of that period.

In Title II, Sections 201 and 202 extend the Safe Drinking Water Act’s resilience and sustainability authorities for drinking water infrastructure and for midsize and large drinking water systems, again shifting the authorization window to 2027–2031. The amendments converge on a single extended horizon, ensuring continuity of federal support for infrastructure upgrades that improve resilience against climate risks, aging facilities, and other stressors.

The bill preserves the existing program structures and authorities without creating new programs or specifying new funding levels. By updating the applicable statutory references (FWPCA and SDWA), the bill ensures that ongoing resilience initiatives can proceed with predictable federal backing through 2031.

For policymakers and compliance professionals, the act signals a stability in federal policy direction around water system resilience, allowing states, utilities, and project sponsors to plan long-cycle capital investments with greater confidence.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill extends the clean water resilience program to fiscal years 2027–2031 (replacing 2022–2026).

2

Drinking water resilience authority under the Safe Drinking Water Act is extended to 2027–2031, including the midsize and large system program.

3

Specific SDWA amendments touch paragraphs 2 and 6 of Section 1459A(l) to broaden the authorization window.

4

The midsize/large drinking water system program's authorization is extended under Section 1459F(f)(1).

5

No new programs or funding levels are created; the act slows to extend existing authorities for planning continuity.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Sec. 101

Reauthorization of clean water infrastructure resiliency and sustainability program

Section 101 amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to move the authorization window for the clean water resiliency and sustainability program from fiscal years 2022–2026 to fiscal years 2027–2031. This change provides longer-term federal support for wastewater and related infrastructure upgrades and establishes a clear horizon for planning, procurement, and project delivery. The alignment with a 2031 endpoint helps utilities and state programs coordinate multi-year investments and resilience projects in the face of aging wastewater systems and climate-related stressors.

Sec. 201

Reauthorization of drinking water infrastructure resilience and sustainability

Section 201 updates the Safe Drinking Water Act to extend the resilience and sustainability authorizations. Paragraph (2) and paragraph (6) shift the applicable fiscal years from 2022–2026 to 2027–2031, allowing drinking water programs to plan and fund capital improvements over a longer period. This supports programs that fortify drinking water treatment, distribution systems, and source-water protections against vulnerabilities such as contamination events, drought, and other climate-related risks.

Sec. 202

Reauthorization of midsize and large drinking water system infrastructure resilience and sustainability program

Section 202 broadens and extends the authority for resilience funding applicable to midsize and large drinking water systems. By amending Section 1459F(f)(1) of the Safe Drinking Water Act to extend the authorization window to 2027–2031, the bill ensures that larger systems, which typically undertake capital-intensive upgrades, can plan and execute resilience upgrades with assured federal support through the next decade.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.

Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Municipal water utilities that implement resilience upgrades, gaining continued federal support for capital projects and system-wide upgrades.
  • State environmental and public health agencies that administer or coordinate drinking water and wastewater resilience programs.
  • Large and midsize drinking water systems that rely on federal authorizations to finance resilience projects.
  • Engineers, construction firms, and technology providers delivering water infrastructure resilience solutions that rely on federal funding pipelines.
  • EPA and other federal program managers responsible for administering resilience and sustainability grants and requirements.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Federal budgetary allocations remain the primary funding source, with states and localities potentially matching or leveraging funds as governed by program rules.
  • State and local governments that administer or administer and administer grant programs may bear administrative costs related to program implementation and reporting.
  • Ratepayers and utility customers who ultimately fund capital projects through rates may experience rate impacts tied to capital improvements or cost-shares embedded in tariffs.
  • Contractors and suppliers serving resilience projects may face market demand fluctuations tied to federal funding cycles and program continuity.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central tension is between providing long-term authorization stability (through 2031) and the absence of specified funding levels or targets. This creates a trade-off: authorities exist to support upgrades, but without clear funding commitments, states and utilities must still seek appropriations and manage potential funding gaps that could delay projects.

The core policy question is how far the reauthorization goes in stabilizing funding without specifying new appropriations or program expansions. By extending the authorization windows, the bill reduces the risk of timing gaps that could disrupt ongoing resilience projects.

However, the absence of new funding levels or performance metrics in the text leaves questions about how aggressively the programs will be funded and whether the extended horizon will translate into commensurate project execution. Implementation will depend on future appropriations, state allocations, and program rules governing grants and cost-sharing.

The alignment of the clean water and drinking water resilience authorities across two major statutes also raises questions about consistency in program administration and reporting across agencies and jurisdictions.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.