The Protecting Our Supreme Court Justices Act of 2025 amends 18 U.S.C. 1507 to raise the maximum penalty for obstructing justice by picketing or parading near court buildings or the residences of judges, jurors, witnesses, or other court officers from one year to five years. The bill is titled to reflect its stated purpose of protecting court officials and the integrity of judicial proceedings.
By strengthening penalties for targeted disruption or intimidation around courts, the bill aims to deter harmful actions and safeguard the functioning of the judiciary.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends 18 U.S.C. 1507 by striking the current penalty of one year and inserting five years for obstruction by picketing or parading near court buildings or the residences of judges, jurors, witnesses, or other court officers.
Who It Affects
Directly affects individuals and groups who engage in protests near federal court buildings or the residences of court personnel, as well as the judges, jurors, witnesses, and other court officers protected by the statute.
Why It Matters
It strengthens deterrence against intimidation and disruption of judicial proceedings, signaling a policy priority to protect the safety of court personnel and the integrity of the court process.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill makes a focused change to federal law that directly targets protest activity designed to intimidate or disrupt the courts. It increases the penalties for obstruction of justice when the protest takes place by pickinget or parading near court buildings or the homes of judges, jurors, witnesses, or other court officers.
The practical effect is to raise the maximum potential punishment to five years in prison for those actions. The scope is limited to the conduct specified in Section 1507, and the mechanism relies purely on a more severe statutory penalty rather than creating new offenses.
The short title—Protecting Our Supreme Court Justices Act of 2025—frames the bill around safety and protection for court personnel and proceedings. While the change is narrow in focus, it represents a deliberate enforcement choice intended to deter intimidation aimed at the judiciary and to reassure court communities that disruptive behavior near proceedings will face substantial consequences.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill increases the maximum penalty under 18 U.S.C. 1507 from one year to five years.
The offense targets picketing or parading near court buildings or the residences of judges, jurors, witnesses, or other court officers.
It adopts the short title Protecting Our Supreme Court Justices Act of 2025.
It amends Section 1507 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code.
It was introduced on February 4, 2025, in the 119th Congress by Senator Blackburn with several co-sponsors.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Section 1 designates the Act’s official name as the Protecting Our Supreme Court Justices Act of 2025. This naming convention carries no substantive policy effect beyond identifying the legislation.
Obstruction of justice by picketing or parading; penalty increase
Section 2 amends 18 U.S.C. 1507 by striking the phrase ‘one year’ in the first undesignated paragraph and inserting ‘five years’ to reflect the new maximum penalty. The modification directly increases the potential punishment for the specified obstruction, reinforcing the bill’s protective objective.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal judges and Supreme Court justices: enhanced protection from near-court intimidation helps them adjudicate without undue pressure and preserves the integrity of proceedings.
- Jurors and witnesses: greater safety against harassment or disruption when appearing for trials or other proceedings.
- Court security personnel and federal prosecutors: stronger enforcement basis supports deterrence and the practical administration of justice.
Who Bears the Cost
- Protest organizers or participants who engage in picketing or parading near courts: face higher penalties and increased risk of criminal exposure.
- Enforcement agencies (e.g., U.S. Marshals Service) and court security: may require additional resources to monitor and prosecute offenses.
- Courthouse-adjacent communities and local businesses: potential disruption from heightened security presence and enforcement activity.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing the need to deter intimidation and disruption of the judiciary with preserving constitutionally protected protest rights. The five-year penalty increase aims to deter targeted interference, but it risks broad or uncertain enforcement if ‘near’ and ‘parading’ are not precisely defined.
The bill sits at the intersection of public safety and free expression. While it targets a narrow class of disruptive conduct—picketing or parading near courts and judicial residences—it raises definitional questions about what constitutes being ‘near’ a court or residence and what counts as picketing or parading in various contexts.
Implementation will depend on how prosecutors apply the new penalty under 18 U.S.C. 1507 and how courts interpret the reach of the statute in different scenarios. The measure does not revise other provisions related to First Amendment rights, but the sharper penalty could have a chilling effect on protest activity in proximity to the judiciary.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.