Alberta’s Condominium Property Amendment Act, 2022 would make targeted but consequential changes to condominium governance. It would revise how ordinary resolutions are counted, allow owners to demand a unit-factor vote, replace the existing conversion building assessment report with a converted property study, and clarify transitional treatment for older reports.
The bill would also expand the categories of charges a condominium corporation can levy. Boards could impose damage chargebacks, recover insurance deductibles within statutory limits, and add reasonable administrative and legal costs to contributions and collection efforts.
The practical effect is to give corporations more precise cost-recovery tools, while leaving regulations and bylaws to define important operating details.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill changes the statutory rules for ordinary resolutions, including separate owner-based and unit-factor voting models and a right to demand a unit-factor vote before results are announced. It also replaces the conversion building assessment report with a converted property study and expands the contribution provisions to cover damage, insurance deductibles, special levies, and collection costs.
Who It Affects
Condominium corporations, boards, unit owners, developers converting existing buildings, professional engineers and registered architects, insurers, property managers, and lenders with interests in condominium units would all face changes. Owners and occupants could become directly liable for certain damage chargebacks, subject to the bill, regulations, and applicable bylaws.
Why It Matters
The bill moves several recurring condominium disputes from general practice into more explicit statutory categories. It also leaves significant implementation choices to regulations and bylaws, so the final compliance picture would depend on rules beyond the Act itself.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill separates two ways of counting ordinary-resolution votes. An owner vote generally gives one vote per owner, with special rules for co-owned units and owners of multiple units.
A unit-factor vote instead reflects the unit factors assigned to the relevant unit. If someone entitled to vote demands a unit-factor vote before the results of an owner vote are announced, the corporation must conduct a new vote on that basis.
A corporation generally cannot vote units it owns, except on a special resolution, where its vote follows the majority position of the other owners.
For converted properties, the bill replaces the existing building assessment report framework with a converted property study. A developer must arrange for a professional engineer or registered architect to prepare the study for the corporation’s real property, common property, and managed property, in accordance with regulations.
The disclosure rules also change: purchasers receive the documents specified for conversion units, while the prior 10-day right to request a full building assessment report from a deficiency summary is removed.The contribution provisions become more detailed. A board may levy regular operating-account and reserve-fund contributions using unit factors or, where regulations permit and bylaws provide, another basis.
It may also levy damage chargebacks against an owner or occupant when qualifying damage results from their conduct or the conduct of a person for whom they are responsible. The charge cannot exceed the corporation’s actual repair-related costs, although it may include related goods and services.The bill separately authorizes charges for insurance deductibles, subject to the regulations and bylaws.
The amount would be capped at the lesser of the corporation’s repair costs and the policy deductible, whether or not the corporation makes an insurance claim. Owners may dispute damage chargebacks through procedures established by regulation.
Contributions may also include reasonable administrative costs, legal fees, expenses, and interest, while monetary sanctions under bylaws remain excluded from contributions.Finally, the bill gives corporations a clearer statutory basis to recover reasonable administrative costs and legal fees incurred while collecting unpaid contributions. It expands the regulation-making authority needed to implement converted property studies, reserve-fund reports, chargeback disputes, responsible persons, and recoverable costs.
The Act would come into force by proclamation, making the supporting regulations important to its practical operation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates two ordinary-resolution voting models: an owner vote and a unit-factor vote. A person entitled to vote can demand a new unit-factor vote before the results of an owner vote are announced.
For a unit-factor vote, each co-owner represents the portion of the unit factors corresponding to that co-owner’s share. A co-owner who does not attend must assign the voting right by proxy for those unit factors to count.
A conversion developer must obtain a converted property study from a professional engineer or registered architect covering the corporation’s real property, common property, and managed property.
A damage chargeback cannot exceed the corporation’s actual repair-related costs, but it can include costs for goods or services required because of the damage. Regulations will govern the chargeback and dispute process.
An insurance-deductible charge is capped at the lesser of the corporation’s repair costs and the policy deductible, and the cap applies whether or not the corporation files an insurance claim.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Updated definitions and ordinary-resolution standard
The bill updates the definition of an ordinary resolution so that it passes by a majority of eligible votes cast by people entitled to exercise voting powers under the Act or bylaws. It also updates the definition of unit factor to include factors specified or apportioned under the new or existing statutory provisions.
The change matters because the voting rules later in the bill depend on distinguishing eligible votes cast from the broader group of people present or represented by proxy. It also aligns the terminology with the new voting and unit-factor provisions.
Grandfathered exterior doors and windows
The bill preserves a narrow historical exception for certain condominium plans. If exterior doors or windows were part of a unit before September 1, 2000, became common property on that date, and the corporation amended the condominium plan by special resolution before September 1, 2002 to return them to the unit, they remain part of the unit.
The provision prevents the general allocation rules from undoing that completed historical treatment. It also updates cross-references governing interior and exterior doors and windows and older condominium plans.
New reports for converted properties
For a conversion unit, the developer must provide the documents required by the revised disclosure rules, including qualifying historical building assessment reports and a converted property study prepared under the new framework. The bill removes the existing purchaser right to request a full building assessment report within 10 days after receiving a deficiency summary.
The central technical change appears in section 21.1. A developer must arrange for a professional engineer or registered architect to prepare a converted property study covering the corporation’s real property, common property, and managed property. Regulations will determine how the study must be prepared and who may prepare it. The developer must also provide relevant reports or studies to the corporation at the turnover meeting.
Owner and unit-factor voting
The bill establishes the mechanics for ordinary-resolution voting. An owner vote generally counts one vote per owner; a person who owns more than one unit still receives one vote and cannot assign proxies to multiple people. For a unit-factor vote, co-owners divide the unit factors according to their ownership interests, while absent co-owners’ factors do not count unless they assign their voting rights by proxy.
The provision gives eligible voters a procedural veto over the initial counting method: before the results of an owner vote are announced, any entitled person may demand a unit-factor vote. A corporation-owned unit is excluded from ordinary voting and may vote only on a special resolution, in which case its position follows the majority of the other owners’ votes.
Contributions and when they become payable
The bill removes transitional bylaw-amendment provisions that allowed corporations to bring bylaws into conformity with the Act within a specified period. It also updates cross-references so operating accounts and special levies point to the revised contribution provisions.
A contribution becomes due and payable when the board passes the relevant resolution and according to that resolution’s terms. The change consolidates the payment rule across regular contributions and other levies rather than treating special levies under a separate timing formulation.
Damage chargebacks and insurance deductibles
The board may levy a damage chargeback against an owner or occupant when that person, or someone for whom the person is responsible under the regulations, causes damage to a unit, corporation property, or common property. The amount cannot exceed actual repair-related costs, but it may include associated goods and services. The owner may dispute the chargeback under procedures set by regulation.
The bill also authorizes a levy for an insurance deductible when the bylaws and regulations permit it. The amount is limited to the lesser of repair costs and the corporation’s policy deductible, regardless of whether the corporation submits an insurance claim. Regular contributions may include reasonable administrative costs, legal fees, expenses, and interest, but cannot be used to collect a bylaw monetary sanction or another prescribed amount.
Collection costs and regulation-making powers
When a corporation takes steps to collect an unpaid contribution, it may recover all reasonable administrative costs and reasonable legal fees, including expenses and interest, from the person against whom the collection steps were taken. These amounts are separate from costs that may already be included in the contribution itself.
The bill expands regulation-making authority over reserve-fund reports, converted property studies, chargeback procedures, responsible persons, and reasonable administrative and legal costs. Those regulations will supply several standards that determine how boards can use the new powers in practice.
Coming into force
The Act comes into force on proclamation. The operative date therefore depends on a separate proclamation rather than occurring automatically on royal assent.
For implementation purposes, corporations, developers, and professional advisers would need to track both the Act and the regulations made under its expanded authorities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Condominium corporations and boards, which gain express authority to recover qualifying damage costs, insurance deductibles, and reasonable collection expenses.
- Owners whose voting interests are better aligned with their ownership structure, particularly co-owners and owners seeking a unit-factor vote when an owner vote would produce a different result.
- Purchasers of converted units, who receive a statutory study framework focused on the corporation’s real, common, and managed property rather than relying on the former report terminology.
- Insurers and property managers, which receive clearer statutory treatment of deductible-related charges and the conditions for allocating damage costs.
- Professional engineers and registered architects who prepare conversion studies, because the bill identifies them as the professionals responsible for the new report.
Who Bears the Cost
- Owners and occupants responsible for damage, who may face direct chargebacks for actual repair-related costs and associated goods or services.
- Owners who fall behind on contributions, who may be liable for reasonable administrative costs, legal fees, expenses, and interest incurred during collection.
- Developers converting buildings, who must arrange and provide the new converted property study and comply with the disclosure framework established by regulation.
- Condominium corporations and boards, which must administer multiple voting methods, maintain defensible records of ownership interests and proxies, and follow future chargeback procedures.
- Professional engineers and registered architects, who may face additional engagement, documentation, and regulatory-compliance demands when preparing converted property studies.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill seeks to make condominium costs follow responsibility and property interests more closely, but more tailored allocation also means more disputes about fault, ownership shares, voting procedures, and reasonable expenses. The central dilemma is whether added flexibility will produce fairer outcomes or simply move difficult judgment calls from the corporation to individual owners, occupants, boards, and regulators.
The bill gives boards more flexibility to allocate costs, but that flexibility can shift financial risk from the corporation as a whole to individual owners or occupants. Damage chargebacks depend on causation, responsibility for other people, actual repair costs, and future regulatory procedures.
Disputes may arise over whether a person caused the damage, which goods and services were necessary, and whether administrative or legal costs are reasonable.
The voting changes also create a trade-off between simplicity and proportionality. One vote per owner is easy to administer but may not reflect differences in unit ownership or unit factors; a unit-factor vote may better reflect the property structure but requires accurate ownership records, proxy handling, and treatment of co-owner shares.
The demand-for-a-new-vote mechanism could add procedural complexity at meetings, particularly where the result under one method is already known or contested.
Much of the bill’s practical impact remains dependent on regulations and bylaws. Those instruments will define the conversion-study requirements, chargeback disputes, responsible persons, alternative contribution bases, and recoverable costs.
Until those details are set, corporations may have statutory authority in principle but limited certainty about the evidence, notices, and procedures needed to exercise it consistently.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.