The Massage Therapy Act continues the College of Massage Therapists of New Brunswick as the statutory regulator for massage therapy and consolidates detailed regulatory tools: board governance and by‑law authority, registration and temporary registration, professional corporations, employer duties, a complaints and hearing regime, investigatory powers (including search warrants) and public disclosure rules. The Act defines the scope of massage therapy (explicitly excluding high‑velocity spinal manipulation) and makes proof of professional liability insurance an annual licensing condition.
This matters to registered massage therapists, clinic owners and health‑sector compliance teams because the Act raises operational and compliance burdens (insurance, registration renewals, employer verification and reporting duties), expands enforcement reach (audits, inspections, seizure powers, fines and potential short custodial sentences for repeat offenders), and increases transparency through public registers and mandatory reporting and education measures around sexual abuse of patients. Regulators and risk managers should be prepared for sharper disciplinary tools and new recordkeeping and notice obligations under the College’s by‑laws and rules.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act continues the College as the regulator and gives it authority to register, license and discipline massage therapists and professional corporations, to set by‑laws and rules (with ministerial approval for key items), and to require proof of professional liability insurance as a condition of private practice. It empowers investigators and committees to audit, inspect and, with a court warrant, seize records; it establishes complaint, hearing and appeal procedures and prescribes fines and other sanctions.
Who It Affects
Registered massage therapists in New Brunswick (including students in approved programs), professional corporations offering massage therapy services, clinics and employers who must verify licences annually, and members of the public/patients who gain broader access to registration and disciplinary records.
Why It Matters
The Act tightens public protection by expanding investigatory and disciplinary remedies and increasing public transparency, while imposing recurring administrative obligations and potential financial costs on practitioners and corporations. It also creates mandatory reporting obligations and preventative measures specifically aimed at sexual abuse of patients.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act re‑establishes the College of Massage Therapists of New Brunswick as a corporate body charged with regulating the profession. It sets out a Board of Directors (5–12 members) and broad by‑law and rule‑making powers for the Board to govern registration, education standards, continuing competency, categories of membership, fees, committees and delegation of powers.
The Act requires ministerial approval for by‑laws that set registration, accreditation and education standards.
Registration is central: the Registrar must maintain a public register, a temporary register and a professional corporations register. Only those listed may call themselves registered massage therapists or use specified titles; students and short‑term visiting practitioners may be exempted under prescribed conditions.
The Act makes proof of professional liability insurance a condition of private practice and requires employers and registries to verify a practitioner’s licence at hiring and at least annually thereafter.The complaints and discipline framework splits fact‑finding and case management between a Complaints Committee and a Hearing Committee. The Complaints Committee can investigate, dismiss, caution, refer matters to a hearing or, in urgent cases, suspend a member without a hearing pending referral.
The Hearing Committee conducts hearings (balance of probabilities standard), can require health or competency exams, produce audits and records, and impose a wide range of penalties including suspension, revocation, fines up to $20,000, publication orders and cost awards. Decisions of the College can be appealed to the Court, but sanctions generally remain in effect during the appeal.Investigatory powers are broad: the Registrar may appoint investigators who can enter inspected premises, copy or remove documents, and apply ex parte for search warrants to seize evidence.
Copies certified by an investigator are admissible in proceedings. The Act also creates criminal and regulatory offences for unlicensed practice, false information, and breaches of registration conditions, with prescribed fines and limited custodial terms for repeat offences.
Costs and fines collected under the Act belong to the College and may be certified as a court judgment if unpaid.The Act gives special attention to sexual abuse prevention: it defines sexual abuse narrowly, makes sexual abuse an act of professional misconduct, requires members to report reasonable grounds to their governing body about sexual abuse by other health professionals within 21 days, and obliges the College to undertake education, public information and reporting to the Minister on measures taken and complaints received. The Registrar must publish results of Hearing Committee proceedings (with long or indefinite retention in the case of findings of sexual abuse).
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act makes proof of professional liability insurance a precondition for private practice and requires annual proof of renewal (Section 11).
Criminally framed administrative penalties: an offence for unlicensed practice or other breaches carries fines from $240 up to $10,200 for each offence and, for repeat offenders, up to 30 days’ imprisonment if no other sentence will deter repetition (Section 27).
The Hearing Committee may impose administrative fines up to $20,000, suspend or revoke licences, impose conditions, publish decisions, and order payment of investigation/hearing costs (Section 39(12)).
The Complaints Committee can, without a hearing, suspend a member’s registration or impose practice restrictions if it reasonably believes the member poses a risk; the member may apply to Court for a stay within ten days (Section 37(7), (11)).
Investigators may obtain ex parte search warrants, enter and search premises by force if authorized, copy or remove documents (with receipts), and certified copies are admissible as evidence (Sections 56–57 and 39(8)).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Scope of practice and key definitions
This part fixes what counts as massage therapy for regulatory purposes — assessment and treatment of soft tissues and joints by mobilization and other accepted methods — and expressly excludes high‑velocity, low‑amplitude spinal manipulation. It also defines core regulatory concepts (incompetence, incapacity, professional misconduct) that trigger discipline and investigatory pathways; those definitions drive what complaints and investigations will be classified as serious and therefore prioritized.
Board structure, by‑law authority and ministerial approval
The Board may set detailed by‑laws and rules covering registration, categories of membership, education and standards, insurance requirements and committee structures. While by‑laws can be enacted by the Board, those affecting admission, registration, accreditation and standards require Ministerial approval — a checkpoint that can affect timing and the content of major regulatory changes. The Board must also include lay representation and can delegate most operational functions to committees or officers.
Registers, licensing conditions and rules for corporations
The Registrar maintains the public register, a temporary register for limited practice, and a professional corporations register. Only registered persons or registered professional corporations may practise or use protected titles. The Act requires proof of professional liability insurance before private practice (and annual renewal). Professional corporations must be majority‑owned by members and carry on practice only through registered members; ownership and voting restrictions are enforced and noncompliance can trigger revocation of corporate registration.
Employer verification, prohibited conduct and penalties
Employers and placement agencies must verify a practitioner’s current registration at hiring and at least annually and must report terminations for dishonesty, incompetence or incapacity. The Act criminalizes unlicensed practice, false applications and breaches of registration conditions; it sets monetary fines for administrative offences and gives courts the power to imprison repeat offenders in narrow circumstances. Fees, fines and penalties collected belong to the College and may be certified as judgments.
Complaints Committee powers and pathway to hearing
Complaints are processed by the Registrar and the Complaints Committee, which may dismiss, investigate further, issue cautions, settle informally, refer matters to the Hearing Committee or, where there is probable risk, suspend a member without a hearing (subject to notice and a 14‑day opportunity to respond). The Complaints Committee is not bound by judicial rules of evidence and may operate panels; it includes public representation and is barred from overlapping membership with the Hearing Committee or Board directors to reduce conflicts.
Hearing powers, remedies and procedural protections for members
The Hearing Committee conducts merits hearings on the balance of probabilities, can require health or competency examinations, demand production of records, order audits and impose remedies from reprimands to licence revocation and fines up to $20,000. Members have rights to notice, documents, representation and cross‑examination; hearings are public by default but permit closed sessions for privacy or safety reasons. Decisions must be recorded and may be published; committee members and board members are protected from compellability about deliberative processes.
Powerful investigatory toolbox for the Registrar and investigators
The Registrar can appoint investigators who may inspect premises at reasonable times, copy or remove documents and, with Court authorization, obtain ex parte search warrants permitting forced entry and seizure. Investigators’ certified copies are admissible in hearing proceedings. There are specific offence provisions for obstructing investigators or destroying evidence, and investigation reports flow to the Complaints Committee to trigger discipline processes.
Public records, reporting obligations and transitional arrangements
The Registrar must publish registers and keep records of disciplinary outcomes (with indefinite retention for sexual abuse findings and multi‑year retention for other sanctions). The College must implement prevention measures for sexual abuse (education, guidelines, public information) and report annually to the Minister and on request about measures and sexual abuse complaints. Existing members are transitioned into the new registers and existing by‑laws continue until replaced under this Act.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Patients and the public — gain clearer access to registration and discipline records, a statutory definition and specific protections addressing sexual abuse, and stronger investigatory and remedial tools aimed at rapid suspension of risky practitioners.
- Regulators and the Minister’s office — benefit from structured reporting on sexual abuse complaints, ministerial approval authority over key by‑laws and statutory tools (search warrants, audits) to enforce standards.
- Employers and clinics — obtain a statutory verification process (annual checks) to manage hiring risk and a clearer framework for reporting and cooperating with discipline processes, reducing employer liability when they comply.
- Professional associations and schools — have a clearer statutory framework for accreditation and continuing education standards to be recognized or required by the College, increasing regulatory certainty for program approval.
Who Bears the Cost
- Individual registered massage therapists — face recurring costs for professional liability insurance, registration fees, compliance with audit and recordkeeping demands, and the risk of large administrative fines or licence suspension.
- Professional corporations and clinic owners — must meet ownership and registration conditions, absorb administrative burdens for verification and potentially pay for audits, document production and legal compliance; corporate registrations can be revoked for ownership breaches.
- The College (administration) — must resource investigations, legal counsel, complaint processing, public reporting and mandatory sexual abuse prevention programs; while fines flow to the College, upfront operational capacity is required.
- Small employers and placement agencies — incur compliance costs to verify licences annually and to prepare and file termination reports for cause, with potential exposure if they fail to report or if reports are alleged to be malicious.
- Members of the profession facing investigations — may face business interruption if suspended without a hearing, and legal costs defending investigations and hearings given limited procedural stays and publication powers.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between maximizing patient protection—through public registers, prompt suspension powers, broad investigative authority and mandatory reporting of sexual abuse—and protecting practitioners’ procedural fairness, privacy rights and the financial viability of small practices; stronger enforcement reduces risk to the public but raises immediate and recurring compliance costs and can produce significant business disruption before guilt is adjudicated.
The Act creates a robust public‑protection regime but leaves several operational and policy tensions unresolved. Investigatory powers — including ex parte search warrants, compelled production and seizure of records and broad audit rights — are powerful enforcement tools but risk conflicts with client confidentiality, privacy legislation and therapeutic privilege; the Act grants investigators access notwithstanding general confidentiality rules and allows seizure of materials that may be subject to competing privacy interests.
The Act mitigates some procedural risk by requiring notice periods before certain orders, but urgent suspensions and non‑stayable sanctions can produce immediate professional and financial harm before a full hearing.
The Act pushes costs and burdens onto regulated professionals (insurance, audits, compliance) while directing that fines and cost awards belong to the College; this can create perverse incentives to rely on monetary sanctions to fund regulatory activity instead of being matched by government funding. Ministerial approval of by‑laws addressing registration and standards introduces executive oversight but may slow timely implementation of new competency or admission rules.
The Act also narrows the prosecution window for criminal enforcement to one year but explicitly exempts discipline proceedings from that limitation, creating dual timelines that can be confusing in practice. Lastly, mandatory reporting of suspected sexual abuse by members about other health professionals may conflict with confidentiality duties to patients unless careful guidance and consent mechanisms are followed.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.