The Act continues the existing Association as the College of Osteopaths of New Brunswick and creates a full regulatory framework for osteopathy in the province. It establishes multiple registers (including temporary, specialists and professional corporations), a Council with by‑law and rulemaking authority, registration and licence requirements, employer duties to verify registrant status, and a structured complaints, investigation and hearing process with detailed powers for suspension, restrictions and sanctions.
This law matters to practising osteopaths, clinics structured as professional corporations, employers and insurers because it imposes mandatory administrative and professional obligations (insurance proof, registration, reporting duties), grants the College broad investigatory and enforcement powers (search warrants, audits, fines, publication of discipline), and introduces specific measures to prevent and report sexual abuse of patients, including an obligation on registrants to report other health professionals within 21 days.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates the College of Osteopaths of New Brunswick as the statutory regulator, authorizes by‑laws and rules governing registration, licensing, standards of practice, specialties, and professional corporations, and sets out complaints, investigation and hearing processes with investigatory and enforcement powers. It defines sexual abuse, requires preventive measures and imposes reporting duties on registrants.
Who It Affects
Registered osteopaths, applicants and students; professional corporations that provide osteopathy services; employers and registries that hire osteopaths; insurers (liability insurance proof); and the public who may access registration and discipline records. It also touches other regulated health professionals via cross‑reporting duties related to sexual abuse.
Why It Matters
The Act moves osteopathy from a private association model to statutory regulation with enforcement teeth, standardizing who may practise and under what conditions, and creating new compliance, business‑structure and disclosure obligations that will affect clinical practice, hiring, and risk management across the sector.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act formally converts the voluntary Association into a statutory College charged with governing osteopathy in New Brunswick. The College will be run by a Council (5–10 councillors) with powers to make by‑laws and rules that set registration categories, education and continuing‑education standards, standards of practice, codes of ethics, specialty designations, fees and delegation conditions.
Certain categories of by‑laws require either ministerial approval or confirmation by ordinary resolution of the College’s membership.
Registration is mandatory for anyone practising osteopathy: the Registrar must keep a full register, a temporary register, a specialists register and a professional corporations register. The College can set entry requirements, issue licences annually, require proof of minimum professional liability insurance before a registrant may practise, and create temporary or student practice conditions.
Employers and agencies must verify registration at hire and annually, and must report terminations for dishonesty, incompetence or incapacity to the College.Complaints can be filed by any person or initiated by the Registrar. The Complaints Committee and Hearing Committee are given wide investigatory and disciplinary powers: they may order health or competency examinations, practice inspections, audits, require production of records, and suspend registrations without a full hearing where there are reasonable grounds.
The Hearing Committee can impose penalties ranging from cautions and practice conditions to licence revocation, fines (up to $20,000 per Hearing Committee order) and publication of decisions. Investigators appointed by the Registrar may enter premises, copy or remove documents, and may obtain search warrants from the Court when necessary.The Act singles out sexual abuse: it defines sexual abuse broadly (intercourse, sexual touching, sexual remarks), makes sexual abuse professional misconduct, requires the College to implement preventive measures (education, public guidance and complaint information) and obliges registrants to report reasonable grounds to believe another regulated health professional sexually abused a patient within 21 days.
The College must report to the Minister on its prevention measures and provide annual sexual‑abuse complaint data.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act continues the existing Association as the statutory “College of Osteopaths of New Brunswick” with authority to create binding by‑laws and rules over registration, practice standards and specialties.
Registrations are recorded in multiple registers (regular, temporary, specialists, professional corporations); the Registrar must issue licences (renewable, showing expiry and conditions) and may remove or restore names subject to fees and conditions.
The Act requires proof of minimum professional liability insurance before an osteopath may engage in private practice and obliges employers/registries to verify registration at hire and at least annually; employers must report terminations for dishonesty, incompetence or incapacity to the College.
The complaints and discipline regime grants the Complaints and Hearing Committees powers to order exams, audits and production of records without prior hearing, suspend registrations pending disposition, and to impose orders including suspension, revocation, practice restrictions, publication and fines (Hearing Committee fines up to $20,000); separate criminal‑style penalties for unlicensed practice include fines up to $10,200 and up to 30 days’ imprisonment in repeat cases.
The Act defines sexual abuse, makes it professional misconduct, requires registrants to report suspected sexual abuse by other regulated health professionals within 21 days, and compels the College to implement prevention measures and to report sexual‑abuse complaint statistics annually to the Minister.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Creates the College and governance architecture
This part continues the Association as the College and delegates broad governing authority to a Council of between five and ten members. The Council makes by‑laws and rules covering registration categories, standards, specialties, committees and delegation. Important checks: some by‑laws (education, specialty rules, certain registration matters) require Ministerial approval and others require confirmation by ordinary resolution at a College meeting — so Council control is broad but not absolute. The Council must appoint an osteopath as Registrar and may appoint an Executive Director; it may also create an Executive Committee to act between meetings.
Registration, licences, registers and employer duties
This section sets out the Registrar’s duty to maintain multiple public registers (including temporary and specialists registers and a register of professional corporations) and makes registration and an annual licence prerequisite to private practice. The College may prescribe entry requirements, temporary practice conditions and minimum liability insurance; employers and agencies must confirm registration at the time of engagement and annually and must report certain terminations to the College. The provisions also allow limited short‑term practice by out‑of‑jurisdiction registrants under prescribed conditions.
Regulation of professional corporations and ownership constraints
Professional corporations may be registered but must meet ownership and governance rules: majority ownership of issued shares must be vested in registrants, directors are elected by registrant shareholders, and registrants may not transfer voting power to non‑registrants. The College can revoke corporate registration if required conditions lapse and may regulate corporate names, partnerships of professional corporations, and the conduct of corporate practice — placing clear constraints on business structures that use corporate forms.
Complaints, Complaints Committee and Hearing Committee powers
The Act provides a two‑tiered discipline process: the Registrar filters complaints and refers them to the Complaints Committee, which can dismiss, caution, inspect practices, order audits or refer matters to the Hearing Committee. Both committees may act without strict adherence to judicial evidence rules. The Hearing Committee conducts hearings, may compel examinations, production of records and audits, and may order suspensions, revocations, conditions, fines (up to $20,000 per order) and publication. The Act preserves procedural protections — notice periods, rights to counsel and appeal — but also authorizes immediate interim suspensions where public safety is at risk.
Investigations, entry, copying and search warrants
Investigators appointed by the Registrar may inspect business premises at reasonable times, copy and temporarily remove documents, and may apply ex parte to a court for warrants to search and seize evidence when reasonable grounds exist. The Act expressly allows investigators to override statutory confidentiality obligations in some cases and creates offences for obstructing investigations or destroying evidence. Copies certified by investigators are admissible in proceedings.
Public records, reporting and transition
The College must publish registration and discipline records: suspensions, revocations and certain Hearing Committee orders are entered on College records and provided to public requesters for specified periods (indefinitely for sexual‑abuse findings; five years otherwise). The College must implement sexual‑abuse prevention measures and report annually to the Minister on sexual‑abuse complaints and dispositions. Transitional provisions move existing registrants into the new registers and preserve prior Association by‑laws until amended under the Act.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Patients and the public — gain a statutory regulator with accessible registers, mandatory insurance proof, complaint channels, publication of serious discipline and explicit sexual‑abuse prevention and reporting measures that increase transparency and avenues for redress.
- Employers and health‑system purchasers — receive clearer verification mechanisms (annual confirmation requirement) and reporting duties that reduce hiring risk and improve patient safety oversight.
- Registrant‑patients and consumer‑advocates — benefit from standardized practice and education requirements, specialty recognition, and formal complaint and hearing processes that create predictable outcomes and record‑keeping for disciplinary history.
Who Bears the Cost
- Individual registrants and small clinics — must prove and maintain prescribed liability insurance, comply with audit/inspection demands, bear fees and potential fines, and may face temporary suspensions or intrusive investigations that disrupt practice and income.
- Professional corporations — must meet ownership‑and‑control rules (majority registrant ownership, limits on voting trusts/proxies), administrative registration obligations and potential revocation windows (180 days to cure ownership gaps), which can force restructuring or sale.
- The College itself/public administration — must stand up and fund complaint processing, investigations, public reporting and Ministerial reporting obligations; those enforcement and transparency duties create ongoing operational costs that typically pass through to registrants via fees and levies.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is public protection versus procedural and practical burdens on practice: the Act prioritizes rapid, transparent action to protect patients (broad investigatory powers, interim suspensions, mandatory reporting and public disclosure) but those same tools impose compliance costs, privacy and evidentiary challenges, and business constraints (ownership rules and documentation obligations) that may reduce workforce flexibility and raise barriers for small practices without an obvious trade‑off calibration.
The Act centralizes regulatory power in the College and gives it extensive investigatory and disciplinary tools (compulsory exams, audits, production orders, temporary suspensions, search warrants) that favor rapid protection of the public but raise implementation and procedural questions. Practical issues include how the College will define and set the minimum insurance level, how it will resource timely investigations so interim suspensions do not become unduly prolonged, and how it will manage confidentiality when investigators may override other statutory privacy obligations to obtain records.
Another tension appears in the professional corporation and ownership rules: the requirement that majority shares be owned by registrants and the prohibition on delegating voting control to non‑registrants aim to keep clinical control with regulated practitioners, but they can complicate capital investment, succession planning and mergers. Small clinics may struggle with the administrative and financial burdens of compliance, and the Act’s penalties and public disclosure rules create reputational risk that may incentivize defensive behaviour, potentially discouraging early self‑reporting or cooperation.
Finally, the sexual‑abuse reporting regime sharpens duties to protect patients but intersects with privacy, solicitor‑client/confidentiality boundaries and potential criminal investigations. The 21‑day reporting deadline and the duty to notify patients when possible are clear, but the Act leaves open operational questions about how consent, disclosure of identifying information, and coordination with police or other regulators will be handled in practice.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.