This Act replaces the prior Occupational Therapy Act and continues the New Brunswick Association of Occupational Therapists as the statutory regulator for the profession. It sets out a Council-led governance model, a Registrar with delegated licensing authority, mandatory registration and licensing rules, continuing-competence requirements, and a multi-stage professional conduct regime (Complaints Committee → Professional Conduct Committee) with investigation, hearing and sanctioning powers.
The law also modernizes operational mechanics: searchable public registers, formal rules for professional corporations, mandatory liability coverage, express powers for investigators (including search warrants and document seizure), stronger sexual‑misconduct definitions and reporting duties, and broad cost‑recovery and publication authorities. Those changes shift compliance burdens onto individual registrants, corporate practices and employers while aiming to increase public protection and transparency.
At a Glance
What It Does
Continues the Association as a statutory body and empowers a Council to govern the profession by regulation and by‑law. It creates registration and licensing processes, sets continuing‑competence and insurance requirements, establishes Admissions, Complaints and Professional Conduct Committees, and gives investigators and committees powers to investigate, hold hearings and impose sanctions.
Who It Affects
All occupational therapists practising in New Brunswick (including students and professional corporations), health employers that hire OTs, insurers and credentialing bodies, and other provincial regulators that receive disclosures about fitness to practise.
Why It Matters
The Act consolidates disciplinary and licensing mechanics now common in modern health professional statutes, increases transparency through online publication of registrant records, and strengthens investigatory powers and sexual‑abuse reporting — creating new compliance costs and legal risks for practitioners and corporate providers.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act creates a contemporary regulatory framework for occupational therapy in New Brunswick. It continues the Association as a corporation with a Council responsible for governance and gives that Council broad regulation‑making powers and authority to adopt by‑laws covering registration categories, fees, standards of practice, continuing competence and professional conduct.
The Registrar performs day‑to‑day licensing functions and may approve, deny, impose conditions or refer applications to an Admissions Committee.
A multi‑tiered professional conduct system governs complaints and discipline. Complaints go to the Registrar, who can dismiss, investigate, informally resolve or refer to the Complaints Committee.
The Complaints Committee investigates and may caution, enter settlement agreements, refer allegations to the Professional Conduct Committee, or recommend interim suspensions. The Professional Conduct Committee holds hearings (generally public unless closed for specific reasons), may order exams, audits or competence assessments, and can impose sanctions from reprimands to licence revocation plus costs.
Parties may appeal Committee decisions to the Court.The Act explicitly tackles sexual misconduct: it defines sexual misconduct and sexual abuse, requires registrants to report reasonable grounds that another health professional sexually abused a client, and mandates the Association take preventative and educational measures. The Council must report to the Minister on sexual‑abuse prevention work and provide an annual non‑identifying summary of sexual‑abuse complaints and outcomes.Operational and enforcement mechanics are significant.
The Registrar must publish registers, including licensing sanctions and expanded scope authorizations. Investigators appointed by the Registrar can enter premises, copy or remove documents, and may seek Court warrants to search and seize evidence.
The Act permits publication of decisions and authorizes disclosure to other regulators and law enforcement in the public interest, while imposing confidentiality obligations on those administering the Act. It also sets out offences (including unlicensed practice) under provincial procedure rules and gives the Association recourse to injunctions.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Registrar must provide a respondent 15 days to answer a complaint and the complainant then has 15 days to reply before the Registrar may refer the matter to the Complaints Committee.
The Professional Conduct Committee must start a hearing as soon as possible and no later than 60 days after referral unless the Committee, Council or parties agree otherwise.
Publication of adverse findings is time‑limited: findings involving sexual abuse remain in the public record for an indefinite period; other published disciplinary records remain available for five years after proceedings conclude.
The Professional Conduct Committee may order a registrant to pay costs on a solicitor‑and‑client basis (including investigation and hearing costs) and the Registrar may suspend licences for unpaid fines or costs without further notice.
Investigators may enter and inspect premises, copy or remove documents, and — with a Court warrant — use force to search and seize evidence; searches explicitly apply despite other Acts respecting health‑record confidentiality.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions that shape enforcement and scope
Part 1 supplies precise definitions—competence, expanded scope of practice, professional misconduct, incapacity, and licensing sanction—that determine how other provisions operate. Those definitions widen regulatory reach: for example, “professional misconduct” lists many conduct triggers (from falsifying records to promoting products for personal gain) and ties criminal convictions and discipline abroad into local fitness assessments. Practitioners and counsel should map these definitions to daily practice, since many routine acts (advertising language, conflicts of interest, recordkeeping) are now express regulatory touchpoints.
Council authority, composition and delegated rule‑making
Council holds broad governance power: appointing the Registrar, making regulations and by‑laws, publishing records and delegating functions to committees and an Executive Committee. Regulations touching education, exams, codes of conduct and registration criteria require Minister approval, which creates a statutory check on certain high‑impact rules. The Act requires at least one public (non‑OT) Council member, but leaves membership, terms and election mechanics to by‑laws — creating a governance design space where professional self‑regulation and public representation intersect.
Registrar discretion, licensing conditions and continuing competence
The Registrar receives applications, issues licences and may require assessments, bridging programs or impose conditions for non‑compliance with continuing competence requirements. The Admissions Committee functions as an internal review body for complex or contested applications. The Act also mandates professional liability insurance as a licensing condition and authorizes temporary registers and multiple licence categories — mechanisms that give the regulator granular control over who may practise and on what terms.
Complaint handling, interim suspension and layered sanctions
This Part sets out a multi‑phase discipline pathway: complaint intake by the Registrar, investigation and disposition by the Complaints Committee (including settlement agreements and cautions), and full hearings before the Professional Conduct Committee with powers to impose conditions, suspensions, revocations and costs. The Council can order interim suspensions or conditions for public protection pending resolution. Panels must include public members; hearings are generally open but may be closed for privacy or safety. The framework allows both restorative (rehabilitation‑oriented) and punitive responses.
Clear definitions, mandatory reporting, prevention and Ministerial reporting
The Act defines a wide range of sexual misconduct and distinguishes non‑consensual acts as sexual abuse. It makes failure to report a reasonable belief that another health professional sexually abused a client an act of professional misconduct and imposes procedural safeguards around naming clients in reports. The Council must report to the Minister on prevention measures within two years and provide an annual, detailed non‑identifying accounting of sexual‑abuse complaints and dispositions—an accountability mechanism that elevates sexual‑abuse oversight.
Investigator powers, search warrants and evidence handling
Investigators appointed by the Registrar can enter business premises, inspect, copy and remove relevant documents and objects; the Court can issue warrants authorizing forceful search and seizure where reasonable grounds exist. Copies of seized documents certified by an investigator are admissible in evidence. The Act also criminalizes obstruction of investigators and treats non‑cooperation as professional misconduct, materially increasing the regulator’s operational investigatory toolkit.
Enforcement tools: provincial offences, injunctions and corporate liability
Unlicensed practice and false statements are provincial offences (category F) with possible daily fines for continuing breaches. The Association can seek court injunctions to restrain threatened or continuing violations. The Act also makes corporate officers liable where offences are committed by a corporation and creates a Corporations Register and licensing test for professional corporations, linking corporate governance to individual registrant obligations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Clients and the public — gain clearer reporting channels, mandatory publication of licensing sanctions, explicit sexual‑abuse definitions and an investigator/warrant regime intended to surface misconduct and protect safety.
- Other regulators and health‑sector employers — receive automatic disclosure powers about complaints and fitness decisions, easing inter‑jurisdictional coordination and hiring due‑diligence.
- Patients of complex or expanded‑scope services — benefit from the Act’s mechanism for Council‑approved expanded scopes and the requirement that registrants meet approved education before practising those functions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Individual registrants — face new recurring costs (annual fees, mandatory professional liability insurance, continuing‑competence programs), potential exposure to solicitor‑and‑client costs if disciplined, and limits on advertising/branding that will require operational changes.
- Small clinics and professional corporations — must comply with Corporations Register conditions (majority ownership by registrants, naming rules), face administrative burden to document compliance and risk licence revocation for corporate non‑compliance.
- Association/Council operations and Government — must absorb administrative and reporting duties (publishing registers, running continuing competence programs, Ministerial reporting on sexual‑abuse measures), which may require resourcing and create tension over unfunded mandates.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing robust public protection (broad investigatory powers, mandatory reporting, publication of sanctions and swift interim measures) against registrants’ interests in procedural fairness, privacy and financial viability — and preserving access to occupational therapy services where regulatory burdens can raise costs or reduce supply.
The Act gives the regulator broad discretion and powerful tools to protect the public, but those powers create practical and normative questions. Registrar discretion to require assessments, impose conditions or refer applications to committees concentrates gatekeeping in a largely non‑adversarial administrative office; the Act preserves appeal rights to court but places the burden of procedural challenges on applicants.
Investigatory powers (warrants, seizure, compelled testimony) are unusually strong for a professional regulator and may conflict with health records privacy frameworks; the statute asserts precedence over other confidentiality Acts for investigatory purposes, which could prompt Charter or privacy litigation in contentious cases.
Financially, the Act allows the regulator to seek solicitor‑and‑client costs, recover investigative expenses and suspend licences for unpaid fines or fees without further notice — a combination that risks imposing crippling financial liabilities on individual registrants, particularly sole practitioners or rural clinicians. Publication rules increase transparency but also risk chilling internal reporting and settlement: registrants facing public disclosure may resist early resolution, and victims’ confidentiality interests can complicate what information is released.
Finally, delegating wide regulatory scope to Council and by‑law processes, with Ministerial approval reserved for certain subjects, sets up a policy trade‑off between professional self‑regulation and political oversight that will shape standards of entry and conduct.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.