The bill tasks the Solicitor General with ensuring province-wide 9‑1‑1 infrastructure and interoperability so any Ontario caller reaches an appropriate call centre or local police, and so that call centres and frontline services can share dispatch data in real time. It mandates technical capabilities—immediate information sharing, a re-bid feature for caller location, bi-directional CAD data to responders, and access to updated cellular location information—and requires identification of water-rescue resources for municipal coverage.
The bill also imposes operational rules on 9‑1‑1 call centres: staffing levels that free supervisors from taking calls, industry-recognized certification and software training, continuous CAD monitoring, mental-health supports, and a written policy covering seven specific topics (from non‑verbal caller communication to mandatory internal reviews after deaths). Finally, it amends the Ombudsman Act to create an Assistant Ombudsman for 9‑1‑1 who assists investigations, communicates with close relatives, runs public-awareness work, and files an annual report.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires the Minister (Solicitor General) to establish interoperable 9‑1‑1 infrastructure, obtain updated caller location data from cellular providers, and ensure CAD systems allow immediate sharing and bi-directional responder data. It imposes staffing, training, policy, and mental-health support obligations on call‑centre operators and creates an Assistant Ombudsman with specific 9‑1‑1 oversight duties.
Who It Affects
Provincial government (Solicitor General), municipal and private 9‑1‑1 call centre operators, police/ambulance/fire services, cellular service providers, and the Ombudsman’s office — with specific implications for small municipalities that operate local call centres and for frontline dispatch staff.
Why It Matters
The bill attempts a rapid, standards-driven upgrade of Ontario’s emergency dispatch ecosystem—technical interoperability and clearer oversight aim to reduce delays and improve coordination, but the measure also creates immediate operational and procurement demands and introduces new privacy and governance questions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act centers responsibility in the Minister (Solicitor General) to make the technical plumbing and operational rules necessary so that any person in Ontario who dials 9‑1‑1 reaches an appropriate call centre or the local police service. That duty includes ensuring computer-aided dispatch (CAD) compatibility that supports immediate information sharing, a ‘re-bid’ feature to request updated caller location, escalation of critical information when dispatch delays grow, and the ability to obtain updated cellular location data.
The Minister must also identify water‑rescue resources in every municipality and make that information available to 9‑1‑1 staff.
Beyond the technical baseline, the bill spells out practical obligations for anyone operating a 9‑1‑1 call centre: maintain staffing levels so supervisors are not pulled onto calls, require industry-recognized professional certification as set by the Minister, ensure supervisors are trained in the same software their teams use, and keep call takers able to monitor CAD continuously. The Act mandates supports for mental health and post‑traumatic stress disorder for staff and requires that frontline responders be able to communicate directly with each other and with dispatchers.The bill requires each call centre to adopt a written policy addressing seven explicit topics—how to serve callers who cannot speak, when responders may talk directly to a caller, triggers for tiered medical responses, accountability for unnecessary dispatch delays, supervisory consultation rules, how to flag and prioritize critical radio information, and mandatory internal reviews where a death occurred and concerns are raised.
Notably, the Act sets near-term technical deadlines in two places: CAD features must exist by December 2023 and call centres must operate on the compatible CAD by January 1, 2024.The Ombudsman Act is amended to require the Ombudsman to designate an Assistant Ombudsman focused on 9‑1‑1 operations. That position will assist in investigations into 9‑1‑1 service provision, give information to certain close relatives following fatal incidents, run public education about appropriate 9‑1‑1 use and alternatives, study ways to deter accidental or inappropriate 9‑1‑1 calls, and publish an annual activity report.
The Act comes into force upon Royal Assent and explicitly binds the Crown.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Minister must ensure CAD interoperability that supports immediate information sharing, a caller-location re-bid feature, and escalation tools; those CAD features must be in place by December 2023.
Call centres must operate on the compatible CAD system referenced in the Act by January 1, 2024, or otherwise meet the Minister’s compatibility requirement.
The Act requires call centres to staff so supervisors are not required to take 9‑1‑1 calls or perform dispatch duties and to provide industry-recognized certification and software training for staff and supervisors.
The Minister must ensure 9‑1‑1 personnel can obtain updated cellular location information from cellular service providers—creating a direct technical/operational link between providers and emergency services.
The Ombudsman must designate an Assistant Ombudsman for 9‑1‑1 who may provide investigation-related information to close relatives despite FOIP constraints and who must publish an annual report.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definition of the Minister (administrative owner)
The Act defines “Minister” as the Solicitor General or another cabinet member assigned administration under the Executive Council Act. That naming centralizes accountability in a single ministry, which matters because the Minister must coordinate procurement, vendor standards, inter-ministerial assistance, and municipal implementation across diverse service providers.
Minister’s infrastructure and interoperability obligations
This section lists concrete technical goals: ensure any 9‑1‑1 dial reaches the correct call centre or local police, implement CAD compatibility that supports immediate data sharing, a re-bid feature for obtaining location, escalation mechanisms tied to dispatch delays, access to updated cellular location information, and bi-directional CAD feeds to mobile data terminals. It also requires identifying water-rescue assets in each municipality and asks the Minister to establish an interoperable radio channel for multi-agency responses (including the Ministry of Health). The provision to investigate equipment/facilities for better listening acknowledges human factors in call-taking, and the duty-to-assist clause compels other cabinet members to support implementation.
Operational responsibilities for 9‑1‑1 call centres and required policy
This section imposes eight operational requirements on call‑centre operators: adequate staffing so supervisors don’t take calls, mandatory training and Minister-approved professional certification, supervisor competency with the same software, continuous CAD monitoring by call takers, direct communications between frontline responders, mental-health and PTSD supports, a deadline to run on the compatible CAD by January 1, 2024, and a written policy covering seven specified topics. The policy topics include non-verbal communication options, when responders may contact callers directly, rules for tiered medical responses and simultaneous notifications, accountability for dispatch delays, supervisory consultation triggers, radio-critical-information handling, and mandatory internal reviews after deaths when concerns arise—each item targets predictable operational failure points.
Act binds the Crown
This short clause makes the Act binding on the Crown. Practically, that prevents claims that Crown immunity exempts provincial ministries, agencies or services from the Act’s duties and signals that provincial bodies must comply with the same technical and operational standards as other operators.
Assistant Ombudsman responsible for 9‑1‑1 oversight
Amendments create a dedicated Assistant Ombudsman drawn from Ombudsman staff to oversee 9‑1‑1 matters: assist in investigations into 9‑1‑1 service delivery, provide investigation-related information to close relatives after deaths, run public-awareness campaigns about 9‑1‑1 and alternatives, study ways to deter inappropriate or accidental 9‑1‑1 use, and publish an annual report by April 1 on activities. The Act expressly allows certain disclosures to relatives despite FOIP provisions, which alters the usual privacy balance in investigation contexts.
Commencement and short title
The Act comes into force on Royal Assent and is officially titled the 9‑1‑1 Everywhere in Ontario Act, 2023. There is no staged commencement scheme or delayed implementation dates other than the operational deadlines already embedded in other sections.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Callers across Ontario — the combination of CAD interoperability, a re-bid location feature and access to updated cellular location data aims to reduce time-to-locate and improve response accuracy, especially for non-verbal or mobile callers.
- 9‑1‑1 call takers and dispatchers — mandatory training, supervisor availability, software training for supervisors, continuous CAD monitoring requirements, and mental-health/PTSD supports directly address working conditions and operational capacity.
- Frontline emergency responders (police, ambulance, fire) — bi-directional CAD feeds to mobile data terminals and immediate information sharing facilitate coordinated multi-agency responses and faster situational awareness on scene.
- Close relatives of deceased persons — the Assistant Ombudsman must provide investigative information to qualifying relatives and mandate internal reviews in certain death-related cases, increasing transparency and recourse.
- Public health and multi-agency incident managers — an interoperable radio channel and clearer CAD-based escalation support coordinated responses to complex incidents like water rescues.
Who Bears the Cost
- Municipal and private 9‑1‑1 call‑centre operators — must upgrade or replace CAD systems to meet compatibility requirements, implement new policies and training, and deliver mandated mental‑health supports.
- Cellular service providers — required technical arrangements to supply updated location information on demand will require APIs, security controls, and operational processes, with attendant costs and privacy compliance burdens.
- Ministry of the Solicitor General and other provincial ministries — responsible for coordinating infrastructure, procurement, radio interoperability and technical integration across agencies; these duties may require new spending and project management capacity.
- The Ombudsman’s office — must allocate or hire staff for an Assistant Ombudsman, run public‑awareness campaigns, and prepare annual reports, creating additional operational costs.
- Small or rural municipalities and Indigenous service areas — face proportionally higher implementation and operating burdens with limited technical staff and budgets to meet deadlines and interoperability standards.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma: improve speed, coordination and transparency in emergency response by demanding rapid data sharing, interoperable systems and stronger oversight—while managing the technical complexity, privacy trade-offs, and significant unfunded implementation costs that those same demands create. There is no straightforward way to deliver immediate interoperability and expanded oversight without accepting either higher public expense, loosened privacy protections, or delayed rollout.
The Act sets specific near-term technical deadlines (CAD features by December 2023; call centres on the compatible CAD by January 1, 2024) but does not attach funding, enforcement mechanisms, or standards for vendor certification—leaving procurement, vendor selection and interoperability testing to the Minister and local operators. That gap raises practical implementation risks: legacy systems, proprietary vendor ecosystems, and multi-jurisdictional procurement rules can make rapid interoperability technically and contractually difficult.
The bill requires access to updated cellular location data but does not define the legal or technical mechanism for that access (e.g., real-time API versus law-enforcement requests) nor does it reconcile those obligations with privacy law frameworks. While the Assistant Ombudsman may disclose investigation information to close relatives despite FOIP protections, the Act does not set disclosure standards or safeguards, creating potential privacy and legal risk for both the Ombudsman’s office and responding agencies.
Finally, the policies the bill requires (accountability for delays, supervisory thresholds, internal reviews after deaths) will shift operational liability questions but do not lay out remedies, penalties, or external audit rights—so the practical accountability consequences remain ambiguous.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.