This bill amends the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to allow the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance to states for water quality projects, expanding the program beyond outdoor recreation. It ties funding to state-wide plans that identify impaired waters and proposed water quality projects, in coordination with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act’s 303(d) list.
The secretary may deliver financial support and credit toward the non-federal share, while requiring consultation with the EPA and ensuring projects rely on natural hydrological systems. It also limits funding to projects that restore water quality through wetlands, marshes, living shorelines, near-shore estuarine waters, or other natural features, and prohibits reimbursements for already completed or fully funded efforts; importantly, it does not expand federal regulatory authority over navigable waters.
At a Glance
What It Does
The LWCF is amended to include water quality projects as an eligible activity. The Secretary may provide financial assistance for these projects and may credit non-federal funds as part of the required state match. A new planning requirement links projects to state water quality control plans tied to the 303(d) list, and EPA consultation is mandated.
Who It Affects
States implementing LWCF programs, state environmental agencies, local governments and watershed groups that will pursue water quality projects, and the EPA as a coordinating partner.
Why It Matters
This creates a direct financing channel within LWCF for water quality restoration, leveraging existing state plans and EPA oversight to target impairment in waters while preserving federal non-regulatory authority over navigable waters.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The draft bill reorganizes how LWCF funds can be used by states, adding a dedicated track for water quality improvements. States would need a comprehensive plan that identifies impaired waters under the 303(d) framework and specifies proposed water quality projects to be funded under LWCF.
The Secretary of the Interior would have authority to provide financial assistance for these projects and could credit funds provided by the state toward the non-federal share of the project costs. The legislation requires that the EPA be consulted in implementing this new program, reinforcing interagency coordination.
Projects must focus on restoring water quality through natural hydrological systems such as wetlands, marshes, living shorelines, and near-shore estuarine waters, and the bill prohibits using LWCF funds to reimburse costs for projects that are already completed or fully funded elsewhere. Finally, it clarifies that this amendment does not expand federal authority over navigable waters and does not grant new regulatory powers to the Secretary or EPA over water quality projects.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill expands LWCF eligibility to include water quality projects tied to state water quality control plans.
The Secretary may provide financial assistance for these water quality projects under the LWCF.
States may credit their own funds toward the non-federal share of a water quality project.
Projects must involve restoring water quality through natural hydrological features (e.g.
wetlands, living shorelines).
LWCF funding cannot reimburse already completed or fully funded projects, and federal authority over navigable waters is not expanded.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expansion of LWCF to cover water quality projects
Section 2 amends Section 200305 of title 54 to insert water quality improvement as an eligible LWCF activity, effectively broadening the program’s scope beyond outdoor recreation. This change sets the foundation for directing LWCF assistance toward state-led water quality initiatives, subject to the new planning and project-definition requirements.
New water quality planning requirement
The amendment adds a new paragraph (5) to subsection (d) requiring a comprehensive state-wide outdoor recreation plan to identify (A) water bodies with state water quality control plans under the Clean Water Act and (B) proposed water quality projects to be conducted in relation to those waters. This links project eligibility to existing state planning and federal water quality priorities, anchoring investments to impairments identified under the national framework.
Water quality projects—definitions and authority
The heading is updated to read “Development of basic outdoor recreation facilities, and conduct of water quality projects.” Subsection (e) adds a new paragraph (4) defining water quality projects and allocating authority for financial assistance, credit for non-federal shares, and interagency consultation. This block also clarifies the scope and limits of the new authority, including logistical requirements and oversight expectations.
Definitions, credit, and limitations
Subparagraphs establish (A) what constitutes a water quality project, (B) that the Secretary may provide financial assistance for such projects, (C) that states may receive credit toward their non-federal share, and (D) that the Secretary must consult with the EPA. It also sets (E) limitations, including restrictions to natural hydrological systems, prohibition on reimbursements for completed or fully funded projects, and a clause clarifying that nothing about the measure expands federal regulatory powers.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State departments of natural resources or environmental quality that administer LWCF funding and coordinate water quality efforts
- State environmental and wildlife agencies responsible for implementing water quality plans aligned with 303(d)
- Local governments and watershed management authorities that implement water quality projects under LWCF
- EPA as the coordinating partner to ensure environmental safeguards and consistency with federal standards
- Environmental and conservation nonprofit groups partnering with states on restoration projects
Who Bears the Cost
- States may incur costs to meet the non-federal share requirement, albeit potentially offset by credits.
- Local governments may bear upfront costs beyond federal funding when implementing projects.
- State agencies must maintain and update water quality planning documents to align with 303(d) and LWCF requirements.
- Interior Department and EPA coordination and oversight incur administrative costs for program implementation.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing expanded funding opportunities for water quality under LWCF with the risk of shifting costs to states through non-federal share credits and maintaining clear boundaries on federal regulatory authority and program oversight.
The bill constructs a pathway to fund water quality improvements through LWCF dollars by tying eligible projects to state water quality control plans that identify impaired waters under the 303(d) list. While this expands the potential use of LWCF funds beyond strictly outdoor recreation, it preserves a strong emphasis on natural hydrological systems (wetlands, marshes, living shorelines, etc.) and imposes checks to avoid subsidizing already completed projects.
The requirement for EPA consultation creates a built-in interagency review mechanism, but the text leaves open questions about how states will balance the crediting of non-federal shares with the broader budgeting process and how funds will be tracked across programs. The amendment also explicitly states that it does not broaden federal authority over navigable waters, aiming to preserve a non-regulatory posture for the program while enabling targeted restoration efforts.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.